Alarmism? No? 18 months ago Assad was in charge of lot of Syria, 6 weeks ago Donkeys were in charge of almost all oil , water and agriculture.
I don't know who is Sharaa but he has the support of the majority of fighting population. We could have seen it by massive enlistment in the liberated territories. I don't think that the West wants to destabilise Syria in such way. It brings not very much. They might leave a dormant problem, that's given, never the less, Kurds have no enough viable cards to play.
As soon as Israeli started their incursions in Syria, I said " Let's use Maximus Fabius strategy". Turkiye and Syria will remain, where they are now , but others can't remain where it is not their natural place. The best example is Iran.
Myself, I think that Turkish government, given the dealt cards, has played all this game marvellously.
To achieve victory, someone needs patience, persistence, endurance, clear goals and above all calmness and pragmatism. Showing any sort of weakness is almost catastrophic.
Alarmism doesn't bring anything, it actually destroys the core , doesn't fulfil any purpose then to help the enemy.
So , I don't understand what's the point?
