TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
3,827
Solutions
1
Reactions
27 13,747
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Yes, there is but TRLG-230 is higher on the priority list.
TRG-300 is heavier than SOM(660kg for 90km block II missile with a 180kg warhead and 585kg for 120km block III with 105kg warhead) and can only be carried by bigger UAVs and fighters.
TRLG-230 is also effective against mobile targets while TRG-300 is only effective against stationary targets.
 
Last edited:

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
3,827
Solutions
1
Reactions
27 13,747
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
@TheInsider any news about Roketsan NLOS missile? Can we see it till the end of this year?
Probably no maybe a teaser. The project is in an advanced phase and surely some info or demonstration can be released but 2023 will be a monumental year for the defense industry and companies want to press the hold button to release everything at once for a shock effect in 2023. "Dozens" of projects will be showcased in 2023 some of the projects that never confirmed officially some other projects we only saw a slight teaser or only mentioned verbally in some reviews.
 
Last edited:

Trakya_forever

Committed member
Messages
206
Reactions
4 572
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Thank u so much for the answer. NLOS missiles and loitering munitions are really vital. We experienced in Karabagh and now if Ukraine had these kinds of systems, the situation would be much harder for Russia.
 

Hexciter

Experienced member
Messages
2,575
Reactions
4 11,447
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
BBD9F748-7300-4C25-AB0A-76B3E55001FC.jpeg
 

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
3,827
Solutions
1
Reactions
27 13,747
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
1) This year. There will also be an ATAS version.
2) UMTAS/MIZRAK-U is the same product with different names. UMTAS (Uzun Menzilli TAnk Savar-long range anti-tank) is the name of the project. MIZRAK-U is the name of the missile itself. It is similar to Hellfire missile.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,054
Reactions
117 14,911
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
@Yasar, @TheInsider
- Any news when can we expect tripod mounted and shoulder fire sungur ?
- Can you clarify Umtas / Mızrak classification and what are their direct US equivalent's ?
The plan is that the Sungur will be joining the inventory this year. (I thought ATAS is the acronym for Air To Air Stinger)
There is work being carried out to increase Sungur’s effective range and altitude. So there may be a Sungur-ER to come yet.
As per @TheInsider has explained Mizrak/Umtas is similar to Hellfire of US. But with recent modifications our Umtas now has a range of 16km.
Both missiles have speeds over 2mach. So they are difficult to intercept.
Umtas has RF two way data link guidance.
Sungur has IIR guidance for precision strikes.
 

dustdevil

Committed member
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
271
Reactions
669
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
The plan is that the Sungur will be joining the inventory this year. (I thought ATAS is the acronym for Air To Air Stinger)
There is work being carried out to increase Sungur’s effective range and altitude. So there may be a Sungur-ER to come yet.
As per @TheInsider has explained Mizrak/Umtas is similar to Hellfire of US. But with recent modifications our Umtas now has a range of 16km.
Both missiles have speeds over 2mach. So they are difficult to intercept.
Umtas has RF two way data link guidance.
Sungur has IIR guidance for precision strikes.
UMTAS should be subsonic. From a previous launch it’s more like 0.5 Mach.

D44934A9-268C-45C2-9DB4-24ABB5679517.jpeg

source video:

On the left there is a time and distance counter.

I wonder if they changed the missile for 16km or if it was already capable of that distance from the start with a curved trajectory.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,054
Reactions
117 14,911
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
UMTAS should be subsonic. From a previous launch it’s more like 0.5 Mach.
My logic was that Umtas was produced as a Turkish replacement of US’s Hellfire, which is a 2 Mach missile, ours should be of the same ilk.
Quote
Both UMTAS variants are analogous to the AGM-114 Hellfire whose use on fixed wing aircraft and helicopters shaped the Middle East’s history for three decades running.
Unquote.

Both Umtas and Omtas use a dual thrust rocket engine. These engines are synonymous with carrying missiles with Mach speeds.
 
Last edited:

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
3,827
Solutions
1
Reactions
27 13,747
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
UMTAS should be subsonic. From a previous launch it’s more like 0.5 Mach.

View attachment 40876
source video:

On the left there is a time and distance counter.

I wonder if they changed the missile for 16km or if it was already capable of that distance from the start with a curved trajectory.
Yes, the UMTAS missile is on the slower side but it is intentional. It is done for the operator to assess the situation and switch targets if necessary with the 2-way datalink. The missile was advertised as an 8km missile but even in the earlier batches, it was able to hit a target 10.5km away(info comes directly from a person who hit the trigger of the missile in person). IMHO production development studies, further optimizations, and better gliding algorithms from the MAM-L probably applied to the UMTAS. That is how the range is possibly extended to 16km in a curved flying route.
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,189
Solutions
2
Reactions
100 23,175
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
UMTAS should be subsonic. From a previous launch it’s more like 0.5 Mach.

View attachment 40876
source video:

On the left there is a time and distance counter.

I wonder if they changed the missile for 16km or if it was already capable of that distance from the start with a curved trajectory.
They have introduced an improved propellant, this is obvious.

Notice the changes on the range of Karaok/OMTAS missiles. Depending on the missile's size and dimensions the gain on the range is between of 1.5 to 0.5 of the initial range.

I think we may expect an update on Cirit's range with this pace, it could be above 12, even 14 km.

A few years ago the Naval version of the L-UMTAS with a reduced warhead weight (rather a special purpose warhead instead of an anti-tank) has reached beyond 10 to 12 km with the legacy propellant.*

It is not publicly disclosed but Navy had a special requirement for the missiles to be deployed on Navy's crafts. We may expect Roketsan to have got this fulfilled it at the moment.
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,189
Solutions
2
Reactions
100 23,175
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
My logic was that Umtas was produced as a Turkish replacement of US’s Hellfire, which is a 2 Mach missile, ours should be of the same ilk.
Quote
Both UMTAS variants are analogous to the AGM-114 Hellfire whose use on fixed wing aircraft and helicopters shaped the Middle East’s history for three decades running.
Unquote.

Both Umtas and Omtas use a dual thrust rocket engine. These engines are synonymous with carrying missiles with Mach speeds.
It should be high-subsonic. (0.8 to 0.9 mach if i remember correctly from some open sources).

Hellfire is wider in radius (thus the trust) and heavier to have an effective super-sonic speed at its maximum range.

The studies back then showed the missile with those parameters were to best to settle with for multiple factors.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom