ÇAKIR can it be? no a bit early I guess! my bet is on MRAShMWith the experience gained from the SOM-J, SOM models with lower radar signature are being studied.
Last edited:
Latest Thread
ÇAKIR can it be? no a bit early I guess! my bet is on MRAShMWith the experience gained from the SOM-J, SOM models with lower radar signature are being studied.
can it be? no a bit early I guess! my bet is on MRAShM
Existing Som missiles already have composite parts. Parts that need to withstand high pressures and forces are produced with aluminium/titanium. Mr Okumus's statement was misunderstood.It was said, composite version of SOM was in development.
As a comparison, JSM and NSM both have composite airframes.
View attachment 41757
With NSM even having serrated edges around the inlet
View attachment 41758
View attachment 41759
As anyone can predict, the seeker of Atmaca was separately evaluated via simulations and lab tests on those aspects. There has been a threshold for acceptance and tests have continued until it was satisfied. However, it is hard to compare these parameters with Harpoon's, because open-source data was not available for Harpoon back then and these parameters were jointly concluded with the Navy and Aselsan (based on some knowledge of the existing missiles).@Anmdt out of blue but how close ATMACA may be to HARPON block 2 capabilities especialy in regard to track-while-scan algorithms improving increased Target selectivity and lower area of uncertinty ?
As a conventional UAV Anka s looks awesome
Slightly changed booster model with bigger wings for Atmaca on one of the pics. I don’t know if just a model or whether it was displayed before. (Edit: or just camera perspective?)
Edit:
As a conventional UAV Anka s looks awesome
It was designed as conventional UAV .. so its bigger .. and has more RCS than tb2 and of course more expensive .. so tb2 is a different category .. and unique .. ANKA is designed to do the normal missions of an uav .. like surveillance .. counter terrorism and border security .. and its better than tb2 at this regardYep, would love to see it more in action. Too bad it doesn't sell as well as the TB-2.
I categorically reject OMGFS as a "new product" as the first tweet has claimed. It is important but the hype deserves something new, unknown.Çakır OMGSF
Ibrahim Sünnetci on LinkedIn: ROKETSAN, ÇAKIR OMGS Füze Sisteminin Resmi Lansmanını Perşembe Günü…
ROKETSAN, ÇAKIR OMGS Füze Sisteminin Resmi Lansmanını Perşembe Günü Yapıyor!www.linkedin.com
I categorically reject OMGFS as a "new product" as the first tweet has claimed. It is important but the hype deserves something new, unknown.
and for anti-ship BORA..There's still some time in the year for UMTAS-NLOS
What does the navy think about OMGFS?I categorically reject OMGFS as a "new product" as the first tweet has claimed. It is important but the hype deserves something new, unknown.
Turkish Navy likes Penguin, in fact even attempted to get an upgrade kit for aged Penguins to keep them active (however konsberg hasn't supplied any). They will definitely love the OMGFS. Longer range, better seeker, better engine, in a lower diameters, these are good bonuses.What does the navy think about OMGFS?
I think it’s more groundbreaking and dangerous than Atmaca. Given enough fuel it may reach Atmaca ranges and can be hosted by smaller platforms, may be launched en masse from VLS & airborne & land& small vessels … the engine can power other types of missiles with this diameter and radical new uses for the engine can be found in other types of munition.