Because those are placeholder CGI models.Gokhan seems to resemble Meteor.
Make the payload releasable instead of this wasteful self-destruction. In a real war the side that wastes drones like this would be the losing side.
How is it a waste when the drone is specifically built to be a kamikaze drone? It is literally its sole purpose for existing. Both Ukraine and Russia are using suicide drones right now, especially Ukraine to great effect. They occupy a different job than ordinary drones.Make the payload releasable instead of this wasteful self-destruction. In a real war the side that wastes drones like this would be the losing side.
Just because something is a particular way doesn't mean it should be that way. It's wasteful to destroy the optics, battery, body and motors when it could instead deploy the destructive payload and be reused.How is it a waste when the drone is specifically built to be a kamikaze drone? It is literally its sole purpose for existing. Both Ukraine and Russia are using suicide drones right now, especially Ukraine to great effect. They occupy a different job than ordinary drones.
First of all, no, both sides use FPV like drones as suicide drones. Here is just a few example videos. You can find literally dozens more like these.Self-destructing types like the Russian Lancet have wings and are effectively missiles, not quadcopters.
It's wasteful to destroy the optics, battery, body and motors when it could instead deploy the destructive payload and be reused.
Third, you're wrong again, as you're thinking only of Switchblades. Ukrainians have been building their own kamikaze drones for months now:Ukraine uses a small number of them but only because the US gives them for free and Ukraine can't efficiently change them to a reusable type.
Ukrainian Deputy Prime Minister for Innovation and Minister of Digital Transformation Mykhailo Fedorov says the drones have already been distributed among 13 units of the Defense Forces, and some of them “have already destroyed dozens of enemy targets.” The minister emphasized the battlefield edge provided by FPV drones, capable of catching up with and eliminating a wide range of targets while safeguarding soldiers’ lives.
Just because something is a particular way doesn't mean it should be that way.
I'm well aware of everything you just posted, and I addressed most of it in my original post. You are again confusing what is and what should be - just because Ukraine lacks the resources to make quadcopters with ballistic targeting does not mean they wouldn't if they could, or that Turkiye shouldn't.First of all, no, both sides use FPV like drones as suicide drones. Here is just a few example videos. You can find literally dozens more like these.
https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/13qdumi
https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/13t49ri
https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/13us1ts
https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/133t7jc
https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/12zftlr
Secondly, you're looking at it just by the cost of the drone itself, which is the wrong way to look at any type of munition in a war. In the videos I shared above, you can see they used these FPV suicide drones to attack soldiers, different types of armored vehicles and even tanks. Drones that drop grenades have to adjust and stay still, these things are flying grenades or cluster bombs themselves, finding their targets and then attacking them at 140 km/h. Perfect for taking down targets of opportunity and great ROI when you consider how cheap these drones are. I mean, partisans even used FPV drones to successfully attack Russian A-50 awacs, one of the single most important equipment for any modern military force:
Reddit - Dive into anything
www.reddit.com
Reddit - Dive into anything
www.reddit.com
Third, you're wrong again, as you're thinking only of Switchblades. Ukrainians have been building their own kamikaze drones for months now:
Ukraine is raising funds to build a strike force of 1,000 exploding drones to help defeat Russia
A Ukrainian military-intelligence unit is building a fleet of "first-person-view" drones for surveillance and to carry out attacks.www.businessinsider.com
Here is a more recent report on it:
Ukrainian company provides army with 500 FPV kamikaze drones – Minister
Ukrainian blockchain company Everstake has supplied 500 Pegas FPV "kamikaze" drones to Defense Forces, who already use those to destroy enemy targets, Deputy Prime Minister for Innovation and Minister of Digital Transformation Mykhailo Fedorov reported on 30 May. "500 Pegasus FPV drones from the...euromaidanpress.com
With a direct quote from a Ukrainian minister:
As I said before, these things are perfect for spotting and engaging targets of opportunity unlike drones that drop grenades which has to correct itself and stay still beforehand. Both has a place in the modern battlefield, just not the same place. Grenade/mortar dropping drones are more effective against enemy that is entrenched or otherwise staying still.
And finally, if that was the case, no military on the planet would invest in loitering munitions or kamikaze drones of any kind. But that isn't the case at all because nobody is looking at the cost of these kamikaze drones or loitering munitions like Kemankeş in isolation.
Waov. The first time i heard about Barbaros.(or i might have forgotten)BARBAROS Coastal Defense Missile System
The IIR Guided ATMACA Missile fired from the BARBAROS Coastal Defense Missile System hit its target with full accuracy.
Although the Çakır and Atmaca missile families fill the gap in the medium-long range, I don't think they will cover all the layers on A2/AD concept. I mean, there can be much more diversity in coastal defense batteries. I think it is only a matter of time before the Raven emerges at short ranges and a new missile group at very long or supersonic cruise speeds.Waov. The first time i heard about Barbaros.(or i might have forgotten)
View attachment 58014
İmpressive. here is the Mavivatan.