@Fatman17Large Shape, not tall geometry is identical to submarine launched ballistic missiles.
They should call "Şişman"Fatman
Latest Thread
@Fatman17Large Shape, not tall geometry is identical to submarine launched ballistic missiles.
They should call "Şişman"Fatman
Not CenkMy guesstimate is this is Chenk. Likely Square canister launcher, the engine thrust looks familiar with the one that one tested for Chenk on the ground by Roketsan. We are not just seeing the fins on the warhead because of bad quality.
View attachment 71675 what is this? Cenk -2????
Not Cenk
Its finless...
Just off the top of my head either something submarine launched or something that's supposed to go to space and favors efficiently over maneuverability in the atmosphere... (MIRV??)
We all knows that Turkiye has many secret projects ans weapons so this can be just one of them , If S korea has Hyunmoo 5 and 4 that have massive warhead of 5-9 ton to cause earthqueke and destroy bunkers deep in ground so i believe Turkiye aslo have those kind of ballistic missiles .
here is what I think (MİT please spare me lol)
Totally not CENK, no fins, we all agree
MRBM? CENK is in that class, why develop something in the same range?
IRBM? Kinda suspicious of that because of the reasons above and ROKETSAN might have been working on multiple ballistic missiles simultenaously (I give up with the spelling tonight) as we have seen TAYFUN and CENK being introduced with only one year gap.
SLIRBM? The form makes me think.
Whatever it is, it is certainly a ballistic missile and not a space launch vehicle as it is launched off a launcher.
Pretty sure Aselsan hinted at devoloping MIRV technology several years ago. Also, just because Türkiye lacks nukes doesn't mean it's not working on delivery methods.If you say so.
Doesn't look wide enough for MIRVs. Also, MIRVs has no use for conventional warhead. Poor accuracy.
www.instagram.com
all i see is 90 degree lauch the exact same with İğneada incident
here is what I think (MİT please spare me lol)
Totally not CENK, no fins, we all agree
MRBM? CENK is in that class, why develop something in the same range?
IRBM? Kinda suspicious of that because of the reasons above and ROKETSAN might have been working on multiple ballistic missiles simultenaously (I give up with the spelling tonight) as we have seen TAYFUN and CENK being introduced with only one year gap.
SLIRBM? The form makes me think.
Whatever it is, it is certainly a ballistic missile and not a space launch vehicle as it is launched off a launcher.
I definitely agree, there could be an obvious clue about the missile's apogee zone. Or from which platform it will be launched. I think most of the confusion is because we can't scale it.all i see is 90 degree lauch the exact same with İğneada incidentseems that there is a need to cover the least distance in the thickest part of the atmosphere...... guess the range is getting less and less relevant
![]()
I have no idea.@Anmdt , is the shown missile to be used on submarines proposed?
Can someone put that in a context? How much PGMs we were using in a day in our operations in Syria? How much Israel is using in a day? How much it's used in Ukraine?This is pretty big for a single signature. 350 million worth of PGM kits. Should be at least ten thousand.
We don't have the data on usage. By and large these are pretty good numbers for day to day usage for few years, but not enough at all for war. Still, a singular order this large is pretty important.Can someone put that in a context? How much PGMs we were using in a day in our operations in Syria? How much Israel is using in a day? How much it's used in Ukraine?