Latest Thread
First two Hisar has no commonality with the remainder of 8, subsystems and design differs. This is why i am pro-sale of these two hulls.but disagree with criticism of hisar sale
5% by 2035 is simply not good enough. We're not getting a carrier we can deploy or 8 AD destroyers with 5% by 2035.In line with NATO’s minimum defense-spending target of 2 percent, Türkiye fulfilled its commitment in this area at a level of 2.13 percent in 2024. Our country has also risen from 8th to 7th place in contributions to the NATO Military Budget. We assess that, by gradually increasing the current level, we will reach the Alliance’s planned target of 5 percent by 2035.
We have hit 1.5 trillion dollar GDP this year and 5% is $75bn, aggregate this over 10 years and you get $654bn, sounds big enough, actual math below.5% by 2035 is simply not good enough. We're not getting a carrier we can deploy or 8 AD destroyers with 5% by 2035.
Re NATO military spending, Turkey has a special place and is out of sight of Trump; because unlike other members it's mostly self capable and has a large army, even though it's ancient in most places.
| GDP growth @ 3.5% | @ %8,90 | |
| |||
2026 | 1.552.500.000.000 $ | %2,32 | 36.011.324.250 $ |
2027 | 1.606.837.500.000 $ | %2,53 | 40.588.903.732 $ |
2028 | 1.663.076.812.500 $ | %2,75 | 45.748.362.230 $ |
2029 | 1.721.284.500.938 $ | %3,00 | 51.563.665.295 $ |
2030 | 1.781.529.458.470 $ | %3,26 | 58.118.180.609 $ |
2031 | 1.843.882.989.517 $ | %3,55 | 65.505.873.137 $ |
2032 | 1.908.418.894.150 $ | %3,87 | 73.832.652.201 $ |
2033 | 1.975.213.555.445 $ | %4,21 | 83.217.889.785 $ |
2034 | 2.044.346.029.886 $ | %4,59 | 93.796.131.845 $ |
2035 | 2.115.898.140.932 $ | %5,00 | 105.719.027.145 $ |
| | | 654.102.010.228 $ |
Firstly is it 5% or 3.5% defence expenditure plus 1.5% for defence relevant projects.5% by 2035 is simply not good enough. We're not getting a carrier we can deploy or 8 AD destroyers with 5% by 2035.
Re NATO military spending, Turkey has a special place and is out of sight of Trump; because unlike other members it's mostly self capable and has a large army, even though it's ancient in most places.
So this one is new Hisar class OPV ? İt looks like smaller version of istanbul class with in front VLS .First two Hisar has no commonality with the remainder of 8, subsystems and design differs. This is why i am pro-sale of these two hulls.
Looks like you were right.Think of TF-2000 as a three-block program. Currently we are preparing for construction of 4 that will make the middle-tier AAW Destroyer functions. It will have a block with less weapon, sensors and multi-mission capabilities (through a multi-mission bay) version and an enlarged higher block version with more sensors, and better EW capability.
Who is selling istifI'm ok with selling Hisars but not İstifs. We need İstifs ASAP.
There was a talk of selling İstifs, but it was refuted.Who is selling istif
i think they will deliver it before 2030 but it would still need 1-2 years of testing before its fully commissionedCritical Threshold in MİLDEN: Construction of Test Block Begins Turkey has left another critical stage behind for the National Submarine MİLDEN. The first test block has officially begun to be constructed at Gölcük Naval Shipyard Command. National Defense Ministry Press and Public Relations Advisor Rear Admiral Zeki Aktürk, in his statement at the meeting, used the expressions, "The construction of the first test block of our National Submarine (MİLDEN) has also begun at Gölcük Naval Shipyard Command." The delivery of the first MİLDEN to the Turkish Naval Forces Command is planned before 2030.
For me having a domestic sub with VLS and AIP is a one of the 4 strategic pillars among our current projects with KAAN, AC and TF 2000.... so defintly worth waitingi think they will deliver it before 2030 but it would still need 1-2 years of testing before its fully commissioned