TR Navy Navy|News & Discussions

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,721
Solutions
2
Reactions
138 26,381
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I believe MKE has been building these fuzes for a long time, most our ships had a similar capability for years for 76 and 127mm. What Strales adds is the radar and the faster rate of fire.
I thought MKE was only making the HE type of 76/62 rounds without the proximity fuse. The picture is from TCG Istanbul which is equipped with Super Rapid. The munition shown could also have been delivered with the gun from Leonardo
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,721
Solutions
2
Reactions
138 26,381
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
According to Akbaba their will be a additional order for 4 istifs.
Source: His arse.

Current Tepe-Class acquisition surpasses a billion dollars, suffice to say well above. The first 4 orders most definitely will be full package consisting of Planar array Triband AESA ESM suite, Full CAFRAD suite, 96 VLS.

However, I am ascertain that the later block will be downgraded to serve as multi-purpose frigate and won't be referred as "Tepe Class". Costing nearly half, 6-8 of these will be procured.

And there will be a final block which will be procured after the multi purpose frigate, and it will be something else, possibly 2 or 3 of these dedicated to BMD.

Source: my arse, nevertheless.
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,721
Solutions
2
Reactions
138 26,381
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
So,when two are sold only two more Istif class?
There are few ships in the inventory, seeming that can't keep up beyond 2030s, at least two of this "rumored" orders are for Turkish Navy.

Also we shall consider this in conjunction with TF-2000 procurement. The very same shipyards of TAIS consortium will be building TF-2000, on in each. 4 more I-Class also means another 2 years, which delays +3 TF-2000 by another two years, beyond 2030 to start construction.
 

Pokemonte13

Contributor
Messages
581
Reactions
11 1,051
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
I think they would first order the replacement for the sold ships and the extra maybe after the 3 tf2000. But overall I don’t expect any more orders for tf2000 before 2029 but I would welcome 10 istifs for our navy.
 

TR_123456

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
6,208
Reactions
1 15,753
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
There are few ships in the inventory, seeming that can't keep up beyond 2030s, at least two of this "rumored" orders are for Turkish Navy.

Also we shall consider this in conjunction with TF-2000 procurement. The very same shipyards of TAIS consortium will be building TF-2000, on in each. 4 more I-Class also means another 2 years, which delays +3 TF-2000 by another two years, beyond 2030 to start construction.
Any news on a ''inbetween'' class?
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
3,806
Reactions
118 17,345
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Any news on a ''inbetween'' class?
Nothing new so far afaik.

But this would be the said in-between class if it happens:
However, I am ascertain that the later block will be downgraded to serve as multi-purpose frigate and won't be referred as "Tepe Class". Costing nearly half, 6-8 of these will be procured.
Downgrading the sensors and lowering VLS count to 48-64 on the Tepe and converting them to a multi purpose frigate at 5-6ktons would be cheaper than a new design.
--
Current Tepe-Class acquisition surpasses a billion dollars, suffice to say well above.
Single ship? We always knew it would be expensive; but damn.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,960
Reactions
238 20,575
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Wth,how come?
Just check out the cost of Type 45 Daring Class destroyers of UK.
According to below report in 2016 ,each ship cost 1.2 billion dollars. With today’s dollar that is 1.7 billion dollars. It hasn’t got as many VLS as ours . Infact 48 cells only. Tepe will have 96 cells. Overall they are very similar ships in size and weight.
Turkish cost base will make it cheaper. But by the time the ship is fully fitted and ready to be in the inventory, it could be 2030. So think about the value of dollar in 4-5 years time. I think 1 billion is an optimistic prediction. It could easily surpass that by a large margin as predicted by @Anmdt .

 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,721
Solutions
2
Reactions
138 26,381
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Wth,how come?
It literally has 2x4 planar arrays for AESA ESM suite covering all the band and huge AESA S-band radar, enlarged AESA X-band radars. They are also rumoring further anti-drone and shorad / short range ASuW capabilities.
 

Pokemonte13

Contributor
Messages
581
Reactions
11 1,051
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
To be fair a billion dollars is still a good price compared to other ships. Greek fdi costs around 800 million per ship and arleigh Burke cost close to 2 billion I think only the South Koreans and Japanese are better than us even though they use American systems on their ships.
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
5,024
Reactions
19 5,116
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Source: His arse.

Current Tepe-Class acquisition surpasses a billion dollars, suffice to say well above. The first 4 orders most definitely will be full package consisting of Planar array Triband AESA ESM suite, Full CAFRAD suite, 96 VLS.

However, I am ascertain that the later block will be downgraded to serve as multi-purpose frigate and won't be referred as "Tepe Class". Costing nearly half, 6-8 of these will be procured.

And there will be a final block which will be procured after the multi purpose frigate, and it will be something else, possibly 2 or 3 of these dedicated to BMD.

Source: my arse, nevertheless.
Now it makes all sense, to sell the first ISTIF Class frigates, because of lack of money.
 

Fairon

Contributor
Messages
491
Reactions
6 1,240
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Now it makes all sense, to sell the first ISTIF Class frigates, because of lack of money.

It makes sense if our navy didn't aged 10 years ago. It will make sense in the future when we have enough ships that delaying new ship deliveries for couple of years doesn't hurt our navy that much. It just doesn't make sense now or the near future. If there is lack of money which clearly is, we need to find that money somewhere else and not selling ships that we need 10 years ago.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
3,806
Reactions
118 17,345
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Now it makes all sense, to sell the first ISTIF Class frigates, because of lack of money.
As I understand it it's not a direct consequence of coffers being empty but financing and timelines. There were some talks of private shipyards spearheading the talks on this sale. If each Tepe is to cost 1bn, awarding the consortium with 3 Tepes is 3bn; and that order is not coming at least before 2029-30. Consortium's military orderbook is fulfilled at the current stage after the current in construction ships are completed by 2028. What do they do until then, it's a 3-4 year gap. Shipyards want neverending ship buildup until at least 2035. They spent all that money on bringing up manpower and expertise to build warships and probably got promises from the government and the navy; they wouldn't want their investments to go to waste. It's a problem everyone has. But there has to be a better solution to this.

It literally has 2x4 planar arrays for AESA ESM suite covering all the band and huge AESA S-band radar, enlarged AESA X-band radars. They are also rumoring further anti-drone and shorad / short range ASuW capabilities.
Someone had wrote a long time ago that each TF-2000 has enough TR modules in its radars to fit at least 6 Istifs. I didn't make or confirm that calculation, but I can see it being true. Tepes are huge, and they will be on the same wavelength as Type-055s and old Ticos. And I really don't see that navy will get more than 4 AAW variant.
 
Last edited:

CAN_TR

Experienced member
Messages
1,595
Reactions
25 5,597
Nation of residence
Latvia
Nation of origin
Turkey
And there will be a final block which will be procured after the multi purpose frigate, and it will be something else, possibly 2 or 3 of these dedicated to BMD.
Now that made me really curious.

Will those "6-8 multi purpose frigates" share the same hull as Tepe-class? If yes, then it means that rumored ~5000t multi purpose frigate project that was planned after Tepe-class are those 2-3 ships you mentioned here?

4x Tepe-class
6-8x multi pupose frigate (based on Tepe-class hull)
2-3x new AAW frigate design
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,960
Reactions
238 20,575
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Now that made me really curious.

Will those "6-8 multi purpose frigates" share the same hull as Tepe-class? If yes, then it means that rumored ~5000t multi purpose frigate project that was planned after Tepe-class are those 2-3 ships you mentioned here?

4x Tepe-class
6-8x multi pupose frigate (based on Tepe-class hull)
2-3x new AAW frigate design
Bro,
I am no naval engineer. But with little knowledge I have for sailing boats, I can say that downsizing Tepe like Milgem may not be possible.
Tepe Class has design measurements of:
149m length
21.3m width
5.75m draught

This gives it a tonnage of 8600tons. That width and draught gives it the stability it needs for that length and weight.

You can’t keep those measurements and produce a 5000 ton frigate.
However certain commonality of parts can be achieved if say with an approximate length of 130 -140 m and a width of say 16-18m and a draught lower than Tepe. A frigate similar to the Japanese Mogami Class. @Anmdt can enlighten us better in this issue.
1773670974011.jpeg
 
Top Bottom