That covers Türkiye,right?I am on the team saying 4 Frigates with AAW configuration would help us a lot. Especially considering Türkiyes location. I'd not put all my eggs are n same basket.
What about the future possibilites?
That covers Türkiye,right?I am on the team saying 4 Frigates with AAW configuration would help us a lot. Especially considering Türkiyes location. I'd not put all my eggs are n same basket.
I am almost on your team.I am on the team saying 4 Frigates with AAW configuration would help us a lot. Especially considering Türkiyes location. I'd not put all my eggs are n same basket.
Milden coming,no?We should focus on more submarines for the Navy too.
Place them on the LHDs in side-baskets like Italians do. You don’t spend target practice platforms costing over billions to carry Siper missiles.Arleigh burke are also 2 billion a piece. Putting multiple siper system equivalent on a huge ship will obviously cost a lot. But we do need at least 4
Hopefully. They have already cut Steel.Milden coming,no?
Bro,
I am no naval engineer. But with little knowledge I have for sailing boats, I can say that downsizing Tepe like Milgem may not be possible.
Tepe Class has design measurements of:
149m length
21.3m width
5.75m draught
This gives it a tonnage of 8600tons. That width and draught gives it the stability it needs for that length and weight.
You can’t keep those measurements and produce a 5000 ton frigate.
However, I am ascertain that the later block will be downgraded to serve as multi-purpose frigate and won't be referred as "Tepe Class". Costing nearly half, 6-8 of these will be procured.
And there will be a final block which will be procured after the multi purpose frigate, and it will be something else, possibly 2 or 3 of these dedicated to BMD.
No 10 lhd and 5000 kaanI don’t know if he’s just throwing things or if there are actual considerations?
I am so fucking tired of seeing Turkish defence industry and projects attract people with no fucking concept of reality. And not just that, but have no bloody understanding or foresight in how things might shape up. What the fuck are we going to use 2 carriers for when we don't even need one! Or 3 LHDs?I don’t know if he’s just throwing things or if there are actual considerations?
Yanina mayonez, ketcap olsun mu?
Realistic expectations; a nuclear carrier plus 6 nuclear submarines with every kind of hardware on board for a start, with numbers to be optimized going forward.
Some of the other analysts I know also sad that when our navy builds nuclear subs than the likelihood of a nuclear carrier increased as well. But these ships are a decade away from even being constructed.Yanina mayonez, ketcap olsun mu?
I hope you know what our military budget is and that every branch of the Armed Forces needs urgently new systems, modernizations etc.
We ask people here to be a little bit realistic, this isn't circlejerkdefence.com
It seems we dont have enough money to produce for our own. The current exchange rate is not very helpful.It makes sense if our navy didn't aged 10 years ago. It will make sense in the future when we have enough ships that delaying new ship deliveries for couple of years doesn't hurt our navy that much. It just doesn't make sense now or the near future. If there is lack of money which clearly is, we need to find that money somewhere else and not selling ships that we need 10 years ago.