???What changes would be needed for TF35K to become a 5G engine?
TF35K (maybe it will be TF38K) will be already a 5G engine.
???What changes would be needed for TF35K to become a 5G engine?
It has nothing to do with Russia,its complicated and to much for me to explain.I have no insight into the political risk of use of F110 in Kaan being denied, so my reservations about going for 5G development may be unfounded. However, I think it possible that the US will continue tightening measures against countries dealing with Russia, Turkiye being one of them.
We are a bit late for a turboprop engine from TS1400,it should have been started a few years ago, and we are too late to start TS3000 project.When we start we finished it,no failure until now.We also have to start marine big diesel engines.If Baykar funds this, we will have a national engine for Hurkus as well.(Our very own PT-6)
If Baykar doesn't fund this though, I don't think there will be a turboprop engine derived from TS-1400 in the near future. Mr. Aksit mentioning this for a long time (He said they aimed for a 1400 shp output for a future turboprop derivative that powers Hurkus) but there doesn't seem to be a demand for it. (Which kinda make sense considering the availability of PT-6)
Interesting development, if true.
My bad. I was thinking of 6G engines, not 5G engines.???
TF35K (maybe it will be TF38K) will be already a 5G engine.
TF35000 won't be made out of thin air, it has no possibility to fail but only get delayed.As far as I know South Korea is hoping to develop an engine with similar thrust to GE F414 by 2035. That would not be sufficient thrust for the engine to be used in Kaan.
What changes would be needed for TF35K to become a 5G engine? Why take on a much more demanding development challenge when the priority is to gain security of supply for an engine for Kaan? If Turkiye opts to take the 5G route and in 2030/2031/2032 finds itself with no engines to put in production frames, it will have no-one to blame but its own planners.
I have no insight into the political risk of use of F110 in Kaan being denied, so my reservations about going for 5G development may be unfounded. However, I think it possible that the US will continue tightening measures against countries dealing with Russia, Turkiye being one of them.
TEI's engine doesn't need to be cutting edge, it is OK if it is even comparable to GE's existing engine which I guess there isn't one in that power class. Who even needs to compare ones own work to somebody else's foreign work.General Electric is working on a very efficient 3000 HP turboshaft engine that uses ceramic maxris composite and eutectic materials. Tei is working on these materials but still does not have the knowledge to use them in an engine, so it will not be very efficient for Tei to produce a 3000 HP engine.
It would make it more intelligible if in your post you clarified which “it” you are talking about.Ukraine has a 2500 HP turboshaft engine. I think it is not difficult to produce it in Turkey with a license agreement. In fact, with the technological capabilities it has, it can increase the power of this engine by 30.
This would mean linking two of our helicopter projects to US. And the chance of this being accepted is low, meanwhile it's not even clear that we will get to build all the ordered T70s as its license is yet to be extended.TEI already produces a 2000HP class engine under license, namely, T700TEI700D . This is the Turkish version of the famous T700 produced by GE. Same engine has a version with 3000HP output power. There is a clause in our license agreement that allows us to make changes to the engine with GE’s consent. All we have to do is to activate that clause and of course prolong the license agreement.
That has been such a big mistake, wasting the license like this. What number were we at, not even half unless I'm mistaken?meanwhile it's not even clear that we will get to build all the ordered T70s as its license is yet to be extended.
It's not like they played around. Aselsan's avionics suite took years to mature, which led to the delay in production start. That's why gendarme got S70i's from PZL.That has been such a big mistake, wasting the license like this. What number were we at, not even half unless I'm mistaken?
We already do, it takes time and lots of manhours. You can't rush these things but we still need new platforms and airframes. T625 is still in testing with its foreign engines, TS1400 is not yet ready and that thing has been in development since 2017.I am not sure if the we'd be able to get any more license production as things are now. and getting a license build agreement with Ukraine is likely not going to be easy either.
If a third country that is extremely friendly with Türkiye were to be used as a middle ground then it might be useful, but to be realistic I don't think any such thing will happen as the world is atm, so we need to get our own engines out there working it's ass off while we gain knowledge and real life data and 10-20 is not enough we need hundreds/thousands of our own engine to start building that database of knowledge.
If Turkish-American relations falls back to that level, you won't have time to talk about Kaan and F-110 engines. In my opinions that F-110 engines are more secure even than the Hürjet's F-404 engines.What baffles me since a very long time is that what we are going to do if we fail to acquire more F110 Engines for Kaan until we manage to develop TF-35000 into operational state?
It's highly doubtful that we could get those engines(F110s) without they drag us through the mud first. In fact, the chance of them denying us those engines is not below 50% in my opinion. We will be in a very rude awakening.If Turkish-American relations falls back to that level, you won't have time to talk about Kaan and F-110 engines. In my opinions that F-110 engines are more secure even than the Hürjet's F-404 engines.