BalkanTurk90
Contributor
Those wings at back closse to engines , i dont know how they calls them canards , elevatorsNeither F-22 nor KAAN has Canards.
What are you talking about?
Latest Thread
Those wings at back closse to engines , i dont know how they calls them canards , elevatorsNeither F-22 nor KAAN has Canards.
What are you talking about?
Many fighters takes off with afterburner its too early for kaan to do so on first flight,I mean they will make up speed accelaration rules for this aircraftThose wings at back closse to engines , i dont know how they calls them canards , elevators
Only one thing Abi,the indigenous engine.Today is a day to be proud for all us Turks.
Finally our big bird took to the skies.
Now the real race starts. We need this bird to go through all those tests that lie ahead with flying colours and in a time like yesterday.
But did it use full afterburnerNot possible. This maiden flight is performed with almost empty aircraft. With fully loaded aircraft, don’t thinks so.
Considering the thrust power of the aircraft, it may take off from a short distance with half load full thrust. But I think this is not the main challenge, this is probably the least challenging part for engineers. There's the hangaring of the aircraft, the sea conditions, the safe operation between the flight deck and the hangar, the approach speed, the landing and the capture system, there's a whole world of headaches. Let our air force pilots meet their their longed-beloved first, the navy can manage with smaller platforms for now. By the way, speaking of navy pilots:NEW video:
Even without afterburners only 300+ meters or so to takeoff. Thus takeoff from modified TCG-ANADOLU is possible with blast deflector, full afterburner assisted by restraining blocks plus ski-jump, landing is no big deal either titanium body can take it.
STOBAR - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgJet blast deflector - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgArresting gear - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgSki-jump (aviation) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Exactly like Mig-29K:
You must watch thisConsidering the thrust power of the aircraft, it may take off from a short distance with half load full thrust. But I think this is not the main challenge, this is probably the least challenging part for engineers. There's the hangaring of the aircraft, the sea conditions, the safe operation between the flight deck and the hangar, the approach speed, the landing and the capture system, there's a whole world of headaches. Let our air force pilots meet their their longed-beloved first, the navy can manage with smaller platforms for now. By the way, speaking of navy pilots:
Navy pilots vs Air force pilots:
One lands with the precision of a surgical operation, while the navy pilot is so confident in the aircraft's structures that 'falls' like a stone on the runway, it doesn't matter if they lands on land or on a ship. lol.
Bro this bird is test prototype and without weapons + to avoid big explosion if something gone wrong i bet engeeners put inside fuel just for the test flight .NEW video:
Even without afterburners only 300+ meters or so to takeoff. Thus takeoff from modified TCG-ANADOLU is possible with blast deflector, full afterburner assisted by restraining blocks plus ski-jump, landing is no big deal either titanium body can take it.
STOBAR - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgJet blast deflector - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgArresting gear - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgSki-jump (aviation) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Exactly like Mig-29K:
Don't say that... We need to produce KAAN and keep producing it until we have designed and developed a replacement. We need to retain skills to build KAAN and retain that, and pass it on. we need at least 1 mio flight engineers and technicians in Türkiye.IMO, Kaan will not be produced in large quantities like the F-16 due to manufacturing and operating costs. IMO, we need another fighter that is suitable for mass production and is cost-effective.
This fighter: 1) capable of controlling drones, i.e. double seated, 2) stealth&navalize, 3) must be single engine.