TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

Pokemonte13

Contributor
Messages
931
Reactions
11 1,730
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
The
This is excellent news about the F110 engines moving forward. This covers one of the most fragile points in all of Turkish defense industry projects and carries the program until 2032-2033 when the indigenous engine is scheduled to be ready. It seems the usual ethnic lobbies in the Congress won't be able to get the majority required to block the process and it will move forward. I hope the deliveries happen with a reasonable timeline.

It's a bit concerning, though, what they said about an agreement about S-400 being done. We have long had a good policy of keeping the S-400 and insisting on F-35s. I hope that continues.
It’s a law specifically designed to target countries/governments that buy Russian military hardware. Even if they wanted they couldn’t and it’s not like s400 is really that important to our air defence too few systems and not enough performance (lacks an iff etc). What we could learn about the f35 is much higher
 

godel44

Committed member
Messages
167
Reactions
8 505
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
The

It’s a law specifically designed to target countries/governments that buy Russian military hardware. Even if they wanted they couldn’t and it’s not like s400 is really that important to our air defence too few systems and not enough performance (lacks an iff etc). What we could learn about the f35 is much higher
I don’t disagree. The S-400 is not very useful for us and the CAATSA provisions require them to certify it has been removed irretrievably.
 
Messages
24
Reactions
1 61
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I expect the S-400 issue to be discussed at the NATO Summit in Ankara and for significant progress to be made.


The fact is that we have not benefited from the S-400s at all; on the contrary, they have caused us considerable harm. I wonder who made this decision, why it was made, and what kind of reasoning led us to it.
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,503
Reactions
15 8,555
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I expect the S-400 issue to be discussed at the NATO Summit in Ankara and for significant progress to be made.


The fact is that we have not benefited from the S-400s at all; on the contrary, they have caused us considerable harm. I wonder who made this decision, why it was made, and what kind of reasoning led us to it.
It saved us from spending our money on F35 instead of the Kaan. Not only money but the unreliability trap. We only want a small number of F35 for NATO operations. The seemingly unwanted outcome actually suits us very well.
 
Messages
24
Reactions
1 61
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
It saved us from spending our money on F35 instead of the Kaan. Not only money but the unreliability trap. We only want a small number of F35 for NATO operations. The seemingly unwanted outcome actually suits us very well.
I'm not a big fan of the F-35, but no matter what, our enemies already have this aircraft in their inventory, and another one will acquire it soon. For that reason, I believe that owning 2-3 squadrons of F-35s would be to our advantage rather than having none at all.

But the real problem, as I said, is the S-400s. Buying them was a huge mistake, and I'm curious what kind of logic pushed us to acquire systems that we've never used, cannot use, and are now desperately trying to get rid of. The current government is working right now to somehow dispose of this system and acquire a few squadrons of F-35s in return.
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,503
Reactions
15 8,555
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I'm not a big fan of the F-35, but no matter what, our enemies already have this aircraft in their inventory, and another one will acquire it soon. For that reason, I believe that owning 2-3 squadrons of F-35s would be to our advantage rather than having none at all.

But the real problem, as I said, is the S-400s. Buying them was a huge mistake, and I'm curious what kind of logic pushed us to acquire systems that we've never used, cannot use, and are now desperately trying to get rid of. The current government is working right now to somehow dispose of this system and acquire a few squadrons of F-35s in return.
No they are not trying to dispose of them they are trying to get the other side to disregard their existence. Our enemies have the fighter and can use them but we can have them and not be able to use them which puts us to a losing position where we could have as many Kaan, even more instead.

I would spend all the money on Kaan development along with its engine and roll them out in 2029 no matter how mature the engine along with the Block 1 and 2. So by 2031 I would have 100 Kaan in the fleet which I think is more likely than not. With the supply chain problems no one is guarantied to supply you with what you need even if they wanted to. So we need to make multiple paths to Kaan engines like using different materials resulting in different qualities of engines. Even the poorer quality varieties will be better than a foreign engine.
 

dBSPL

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Ambassador
Messages
2,814
Reactions
118 14,300
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Have the 6 F-35s been paid for? Yes. Then efforts should continue to either deliver these aircraft or compensate for the loss by delivering the same number of aircraft from current production blocks. Even if these aircraft are used in a mixed fleet within NATO missions, they can be very useful for tactical training; we can even use them as red-flag aircraft, and indigenous systems can be tested against them technically and tactically.

Beyond that, I believe the main condition for a meaningful order size (max 2 fleets A, 1 fleet B) is ensuring some kind of return on industrial participation. If it won't contribute to the Turkish defense industry anymore (we thank them for their initial contributions), we should continue to focus resources on KAAN and unmanned programs.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,706
Reactions
65 21,763
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
I'm not a big fan of the F-35, but no matter what, our enemies already have this aircraft in their inventory, and another one will acquire it soon. For that reason, I believe that owning 2-3 squadrons of F-35s would be to our advantage rather than having none at all.

But the real problem, as I said, is the S-400s. Buying them was a huge mistake, and I'm curious what kind of logic pushed us to acquire systems that we've never used, cannot use, and are now desperately trying to get rid of. The current government is working right now to somehow dispose of this system and acquire a few squadrons of F-35s in return.
Current government is the same that made the decision in the past. No logic at all.
 

mehmed beg

Contributor
Messages
665
Reactions
3 776
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
I don't know how much of mistake the purchase of S400 was. What mid to long range air defence system Turkiye had till Super came along?
All the event around the country and without any viable air defences?
They practically forced Turkiye into buying S400.
F35 , if it is received quickly, can help development of KAAN, quicker development of air tactics and if F35Bs are acquired, then Anladolu or future LHD can be more effective and in the case of the war , the assets can be spread around the country.
But, considering the availability, costs , strings attached and money needed, 2 squadrons aren't that much of difference. If Turkey wasn't excluded in the production of the planes and wasn't forced to spend for the " alternatives" then this project could have been very useful. All of this is designed to take the money away from KAAN project
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
4,142
Reactions
250 21,642
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Off topic posts are deleted.
Please stay on topic and not divert discussion.
This is “TFX-KAAN Fighter Jet“ thread.
 

Pokemonte13

Contributor
Messages
931
Reactions
11 1,730
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
I don't know how much of mistake the purchase of S400 was. What mid to long range air defence system Turkiye had till Super came along?
All the event around the country and without any viable air defences?
They practically forced Turkiye into buying S400.
F35 , if it is received quickly, can help development of KAAN, quicker development of air tactics and if F35Bs are acquired, then Anladolu or future LHD can be more effective and in the case of the war , the assets can be spread around the country.
But, considering the availability, costs , strings attached and money needed, 2 squadrons aren't that much of difference. If Turkey wasn't excluded in the production of the planes and wasn't forced to spend for the " alternatives" then this project could have been very useful. All of this is designed to take the money away from KAAN project
Only partially true there were some opposition to us buying patriot but the real reason why we didn’t get it was firstly we wanted transfer of technology (or at least some local industry involved) secondly price the American as always sell stuff to us at a high price as most foreign countries. There were two instances were they (offered) patriot 2010 and 2018. If we had bought the f35 Kaan would have taken longer in its development. Overall without the arms restrictions imposed by the USA starting in 2016 our localisation would have have taken longer remember istif was supposed to have Mk 41 and Thales rader…
 
Top Bottom