Most of what you write is correct. But it is not the whole story.
For operations within or close proximity to our borders what you propose is doable...............
I am being sarcastic huh!..calm down.. never mix apples with doughnuts.. Every platform has its own use, drones opened up a new level but they are far from replacing F16, F4s.. and I am sick of seeing people comparing them so I won't read these replies.
I guess I was misunderstood. I did not say that the akıncı is faster than the f4 aircraft, carries more bomb, and climbs higher. I said that it can do the task that the F4 plane does. we use f4 planes in terrorist operations. We do not use it in dogfights with Greek planes in the Aegean Sea.
The terrorist organization cannot carry out electronic warfare against you. The only thing dangerous for the uav in their hands is manpads. manpads are effective up to 15-20 thousand altitude at most. A fully loaded akıncı can operate at an altitude of 30,000 feet. Also, it doesn't have to be very fast. It doesn't matter if you bomb the cave you detected 1-2 hours later than the warplane. The cave does not run away. terrorists do not know that you have detected the caves. so 1-2 hour delay is not a problem. If there is an operational UAV in the air, that delay will not occur. we use mam-l for other tasks. There are many tb2 and anka uav carrying mam-l. and they can intervene immediately.
The recent testing of teber guided bombs by uavs is proof of my opinion. In 1-2 years, sert and sarb bunker buster bombs will be tested from the uav. The uavs circulating in the Aegean Sea with cruise missiles will fly with mk series bombs in the eastern regions. will carry out heavy bombardment missions.