TR Turkiye's F-35 Project and Discussions

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
5,108
Reactions
19 5,199
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Not really. It's very close on most matters and Turkey for the last decade have always been bipartizan with multiple interest groups on it. A president simply cannot order his party to do a thing, they never have that much sway over their party.
US politicians works little bit different.
“A favor for a favor. “ And Trump know very well how to manipulate his own people.
 

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
2,077
Solutions
1
Reactions
42 6,167
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
A president simply cannot order his party to do a thing, they never have that much sway over their party.
You clearly haven't been paying attention mate, Trump can and do order his party around. He killed a bill Republicans themselves worked on with just one tweet because it would've gone against one of his narratives against Biden and he wasn't even the president then. Republicans either fall in line or get ousted, it has happened multiple times just in 2025. Trump presidency doesn't confirm to norms of the US, it is far more like how our government operates. Both legislative and judicial bodies virtually handed all their power over to him already.

Only if democrats win in 2026 and 2028 this will change, but I really wouldn't bet on it because people behind Trump play dirty and far smarter than him.
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,330
Reactions
15 8,244
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
In the light of the latest discussions an update of the next generation fighter jets outlook, with estimates on Kaan prospects

1768504899064.png
 
Last edited:

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
3,872
Reactions
119 17,669
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Meh. I have my strong doubts that A400M can carry components of a S400 battery. Not just the dimensions but by weight as well. Regardless that's at least 8 sorties without considering the missile loads. These are huge 8x8 vehicles, lightest of which weight 30-35 tons. For example for the latest radar that was sent, was sent using a Qatari C-17.

We are sending lots of other stuff.
 
Last edited:

IC3M@N FX

Contributor
Messages
610
Reactions
3 30 1,244
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Assuming we get the F-35, I wonder who we can use it against?

Greece? The US would probably shut down both countries' aircraft... before a conflict arose, and would even sell it as de-escalation. How clever and forward-thinking they are as Americans...😂

Against Israel? 😂😂😂😂😂😂 I don't need to write any more on that.

Against Russia/Iran? Their junk aircraft and drones still haven't achieved absolute dominance in Ukraine, which is embarrassing enough. No one takes Russia seriously in terms of conventional capabilities.

Analysis and partial reverse engineering to explore US Gen 5/Pre Gen 6 Logic? You don't need 40+ machines for that...

For NATO missions? You don't need F-35s for that; the Eurofighter/F-16s will suffice until 2040+.

Prestige in the F-35 club? I don't see any added value here...

Access to MRO and spare parts and parts manufacturing via TAI and TEI? That's the only logical reason I've found. Whether it's enough is another question.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
3,872
Reactions
119 17,669
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Assuming we get the F-35, I wonder who we can use it against?

Greece? The US would probably shut down both countries' aircraft... before a conflict arose, and would even sell it as de-escalation. How clever and forward-thinking they are as Americans...😂

Against Israel? 😂😂😂😂😂😂 I don't need to write any more on that.

Against Russia/Iran? Their junk aircraft and drones still haven't achieved absolute dominance in Ukraine, which is embarrassing enough. No one takes Russia seriously in terms of conventional capabilities.

Analysis and partial reverse engineering to explore US Gen 5/Pre Gen 6 Logic? You don't need 40+ machines for that...

For NATO missions? You don't need F-35s for that; the Eurofighter/F-16s will suffice until 2040+.

Prestige in the F-35 club? I don't see any added value here...

Access to MRO and spare parts and parts manufacturing via TAI and TEI? That's the only logical reason I've found. Whether it's enough is another question.
I'm yet to receive a retort to these points I made last year.
They could just not spend millions on donations to US politicians to boot Turkey out of JSF; but they did that.

There's nothing suspicious about anything. Israel worked for more than 5 years actively to make sure Turkey didn't get F-35s and it is still working actively to keep the laws that enabled this to stay on line. And then we have Bibi and even Greek PM on live TV saying "Turkey not being able to get F-35s is actually great for us".

Only Turkey's rivals and some small onset of Turks support Turkey NOT getting F-35s. It's comical.
 

Oublious

Experienced member
The Netherlands Correspondent
Messages
2,695
Reactions
15 5,912
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
Meh. I have my strong doubts that A400M can carry components of a S400 battery. Not just the dimensions but by weight as well. Regardless that's at least 8 sorties without considering the missile loads. These are huge 8x8 vehicles, lightest of which weight 30-35 tons. For example for the latest radar that was sent, was sent using a Qatari C-17.

We are sending lots of other stuff.


You got a point to, but hope for the best.
 

IC3M@N FX

Contributor
Messages
610
Reactions
3 30 1,244
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
I'm yet to receive a retort to these points I made last year.
Okay, but why do we need these F-35 aircraft strategically and militarily? There is no question that Greece and Israel need them, and the likelihood that they will use them against us to exert pressure is real.

But what do we gain from this? Israel's QME is guaranteed by the USA, which means that Israel must always be militarily superior to everyone else in the region. Conversely, this means that using the F-35 as a tool against Israeli pressure is unrealistic.
So someone needs to explain to me logically why and for what purpose we need the F-35. You can't use them against key rivals, period!

Next thing even if Turkey receives the F-35, no one can rule out the possibility that the RAM coatings, avionics and radar will be limited in terms of hardware and software compared to the models used by Israel (Custom Version) and Greece (Full US Version maybe). Turkey (Light Version maybe) cannot verify this, as it does not have a US reference Model for comparison.

That's why TAI KAAN and its drones are a variable that Israel/Greece cannot control, either with ITAR or blockades/sanctions; they cannot scale up, but we can, no matter how good the F-35 may be, even with later blocks. If TAI KAAN can have 140-160 units by 2040+, including 100+ Kizilelma & Anka 3 drones, there's no turning back. What is there is there; it would be a fundamental shift in power in the region. The US cannot stop this, only slow it down.
 
Last edited:

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
5,108
Reactions
19 5,199
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
These people talk like U.S. has alien technology. It comes from a place of sense of deep inferiority.
Thank you very much!!!
And one more point. We talk about an existing technology. Not something what have to be invented. Its already their.

About F-35 purchasing. Maybe a political and geostrategic move than a military one.”Buy from us, be save from us (USA).”
 

IC3M@N FX

Contributor
Messages
610
Reactions
3 30 1,244
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
It’s all just for show… Don’t focus on what’s being said, but on what’s actually happening.

In geopolitics, the latter is what matters, and that is the real significance: there is no Turkish return to the F-35 program.

Any delay—however welcome it may be—caused by statements regarding the return of the F-35, such as the delay of the TAI KAAN program, is a stroke of luck for them.
 

GoatsMilk

Experienced member
Messages
4,139
Reactions
28 11,050
Nation of residence
United Kingdom

I always saw the s400 in the context of what was going on in syria. We kind of forget how dark the region looked not so long ago. Both the USA and Russia were co-ordinating their actions in syria against Turkiye. Do you remember the flag games they would play so we couldn't hit the PKK. We had the EU threatening us with sanctions not to protect our own interests/sovereignty. The iranians and their shia death squads were also active against us. Every single regional and global player who had a stake in syria wanted Turkiye out of Syria except for the actual Syrian people fighting the revolution.

S400 was purchased by ak party thinking they would gain favour from Russia, this favour they hoped would gain Turkiye favour in Syria. Then by buying s400 it would create pressure on the USA to backdown somewhat against us in syria, fearing that we could move towards Russia.

The opposite happened. The USA seeing that we brought s400 used it screw Turkiye harder and the Russians seeing that our connection to the USA became much weaker used it f'k us harder.

As for the F35, american weapons have never been sold to Turkiye to defend our interests, they are sold to Turkiye to defend american interests. However zionists are desperate to start a war against Turkiye sooner rather then later. Turkish policy should be to buy at least 10 years more of development time, ideally 20 years. After that were good for a big regional war, Turkiye can make massive gains from war at that point. But we must not be baited into a war until our airforce is made by us.
 
Top Bottom