Latest Thread
F35B....What are the reasons/arguments for going this route first instead of just making an aircraft carrier?
I think it was to get experience may to build a real aircraft carrier in the 30s may be.What are the reasons/arguments for going this route first instead of just making an aircraft carrier?
What about those countries' own nationals Bayraktar operators, don't they count?I dont think so, we are not talking about an airliner here, most countries wont allow foreigners to operate a military vehicle.
When you say anywhere in the world it implies you can aply for job abroad.What about those countries' own nationals Bayraktar operators, don't they count?
A fixed wing traditional aircraft trying to land, fail and trying to take off after a touch and go on a carrier with skijump would be a first in history if they did that. I really wish they won't try that. There really isn't any place on Anadolu for a touch and go.Break failure is easily solvable through software. TB3 could reaccelerate upon touch down if brakes fail. Ship would be safe but drone would probably have to be ditched if too far from land.
I didn't say a Bayraktar operator which means a certain individual, I said Bayraktar operators which encompasses a pool of them which can include all of them. My words are final.When you say anywhere in the world it implies you can aply for job abroad.
Üstadım, in addition to that: another thing that makes me think is safety net. TB-3 contact with the runway could be at very low speeds and a safety net on the part of the line that is not to be run could really come in handy. But a jet with a turbofan and a landing weight of at least 4 tons will probably touch down around 100knot minimum. It will have to run a longer line and if it cannot stop, it will contact the safety net at very high speed.A fixed wing traditional aircraft trying to land, fail and trying to take off after a touch and go on a carrier with skijump would be a first in history if they did that. I really wish they won't try that. There really isn't any place on Anadolu for a touch and go.
I have a question.
From a safety point of view, wouldn't it be more appropriate to design the TB-3's wings wider but shorter?
Yup. Anadolu will hardly be efficient in sortie generation with fixed wing drones. Which is still okay, as I think it will primarily be a training platform for at least next few years. But one gotta also consider, they will send a drone away for up to 12-24 hours. Drone operations do not require that big of sortie generation numbers. Take off and landing of helicopters however will basically stop while drone ops are underway.And of course, the fact that the safety net will be opened at each landing and that these aircraft will use all or almost all of the runway for each landing and take-off will be factors that will limit the runway preparation time and therefore the hour / sortie capacity.
Yes, like this.View attachment 56023
like this?
Fake fans? What do you mean?Everyone talks about some aluminium drone meanwhile im simping for those supercobras in the back. fake fans