TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

Ryder

Experienced member
Messages
10,857
Reactions
6 18,707
Nation of residence
Australia
Nation of origin
Turkey
I remember reading that Baykar will focus on space after Kızılelma (they'll continue to develop and upgrade kızılelma tho) so i'm guessing we won't see Baykar revealing anything new anytime soon.

Space Drones?
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,247
Reactions
141 16,269
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
2x10000lbf engined version of KE will probably be the pinnacle of our UCAV projects in this decade. With a dry thrust of 12000lbf in total, the engines should impart a capability to achieve supersonic flight without afterburners to the aircraft, as well as improving MTOW performance. Due to the high thrust level, take-off distance should be greatly shortened which is augmented by the delta wing construction in the first place anyway.
As a fighter plane it will have a similar dry thrust level of a GE-f414 powered Gripen E (16500kg MTOW), but with much lower MTOW. If it can be produced with modular and portable take-off/landing accessory components, we can use KE from short rural roads without the need for long expensive runways. Just like Gripen. Even better.
Against our opponents, not knowing where an air strike is coming from, will be an immense advantage on our behalf. It would also improve the effective range of the plane.
Added to all this, a stealth performance will further improve the lethality of the platform. There will be very little our enemies could do against this aircraft.

1682140759282.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Rodeo

Contributor
Moderator
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
1,330
Reactions
31 5,067
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
He says there are 15k employees of TAI. A healthy, growing company should have as many open positions as at least 10% of company's employee count. By this logic, TAI should have 1.500 job postings on its website or Linkedin. How many does TAI have? A mere 22. twenty-two! Do they have no hope of Turkiye's human capital that they hire only new-graduates and they don't even bother posting job openings? Why?
 

Radonsider

Contributor
Messages
1,467
Reactions
14 2,802
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
He says there are 15k employees of TAI. A healthy, growing company should have as many open positions as at least 10% of company's employee count. By this logic, TAI should have 1.500 job postings at its website or Linkedin. How many does TAI have? A mere 22. twenty-two! Do they have no hope of Turkiye's human capital that they hire only new-graduates and they don't even bother posting job openings? Why?
Most of its open positions are "recruits" from Bsc or Msc's
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,342
Reactions
79 10,725
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I like flying wings as much as the next guy, and of course as it's a scale model for national tv, displaying the payload outside makes sense for the laymen, but, what's the point of a flying wing that can carry 1500ks internally, if it will carry a AselPod(?) on the outside with two SOMs on the wings? It was the same with the prototype and Şimşek drones on the wings. External load takes away every advantage the flying wing configuration creates for low observability.

It's just weird how they're presenting it like this. Is LO by structural design not one of the design cues for Anka-3? I thought it was.
 

Radonsider

Contributor
Messages
1,467
Reactions
14 2,802
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
I like flying wings as much as the next guy, and of course as it's a scale model for national tv, displaying the payload outside makes sense for the laymen, but, what's the point of a flying wing that can carry 1500ks internally, if it will carry a AselPod(?) on the outside with two SOMs on the wings? It was the same with the prototype and Şimşek drones on the wings. External load takes away every advantage the flying wing configuration creates for low observability.

It's just weird how they're presenting this. Is LO by design not one of the design cues for Anka-3? I thought it would.
They are optional you know
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,342
Reactions
79 10,725
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
They are optional you know
Yes, but you are still left with the rails when you release the munitions and you can't realistically jettison the EO pod. It's not a deep strike platform when it's in the beast mode as they call it but a bomb truck. I LOVE bomb trucks, but do we need a bomb truck flying wing? Maybe we'll learn more after the first flight.
 

Radonsider

Contributor
Messages
1,467
Reactions
14 2,802
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Yes, but you are still left with the rails when you release the munitions and you can't realistically jettison the EO pod. It's not a deep strike platform when it's in the beast mode as they call it but a bomb truck.
I mean, F-22 and F-35 can also load a similar load. I expect that EO to be optional and that option being TOYGUN, not that spherical thing :d
 

Rodeo

Contributor
Moderator
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
1,330
Reactions
31 5,067
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I doubt that Baykar has cooperation with nearly every good university in Turkey tho
That's not a good way to run your business. What about the engineers with years of experience? How can you effectively utilize the engineering pool if you don't even have job openings for their profession?
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom