TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

E

Era_shield

Guest
If there were no other solution they would simply start from scratch and do the right things to get to a product unlike what Aselsan did. They could perhaps even move faster than Aselsan. You don't need all that much optics expertise, it is simply a telescope after all, even ameteurs make telescopes.
Electro-optic systems are much more than telescopes. They are far from Baykar's area of expertise. Thanks to all the money they made, in the future they may be able to expand into that but it would be a huge investment. In the past it would be completely impossible for Baykar to do this due to lack of funds.
 

MADDOG

Contributor
Türkiye Correspondent
Professional
Messages
1,224
Reactions
33 8,047
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Cyprus
Screen Shot 2023-05-11 at 22.34.35.png
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,014
Reactions
10 7,705
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Electro-optic systems are much more than telescopes. They are far from Baykar's area of expertise. Thanks to all the money they made, in the future they may be able to expand into that but it would be a huge investment. In the past it would be completely impossible for Baykar to do this due to lack of funds.
It only makes sense to enter those fields if they can not source good quality products from other companies.
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,984
Reactions
103 9,648
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
It would be really interesting to know much each unit would cost.
@TheInsider
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,014
Reactions
10 7,705
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Everything sounds so easy from your mouth, can you explain to me why they didnt do it until now if its that easy?
Isn't it already obvious because they can source good quality products from other companies, why bother making them yourself. If they couldn't source them they would develop them in-house.
 

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
1,860
Solutions
1
Reactions
30 5,390
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Between Çakır and UAV-230, we'll have 2 options for different missions with 150+ km range for our heavy duty drones like Akıncı and Aksungur. How many air defense systems have longer range than that? Our drones can rain fire from relative safety with these missiles in a lot of situations except for the worst case ones, for which we just happened to be developing Anka-3.
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,984
Reactions
103 9,648
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
Between Çakır and UAV-230, we'll have 2 options for different missions with 150+ km range for our heavy duty drones like Akıncı and Aksungur. How many air defense systems have longer range than that? Our drones can rain fire from relative safety with these missiles in a lot of situations except for the worst case ones, for which we just happened to be developing Anka-3.

And also KE, just like featured in Cakir's promo carrying them internally.
 

Quasar

Contributor
The Post Deleter
Messages
796
Reactions
51 3,440
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
seems that Çakır has a new wing design at least for the air launced variant acompared to the variant with booster

1683837836139.png


1683837984025.png
 
Last edited:

Xenon54

Experienced member
Switzerland Correspondent
Messages
2,181
Reactions
5 6,705
Nation of residence
Switzerland
Nation of origin
Turkey
Isn't it already obvious because they can source good quality products from other companies, why bother making them yourself. If they couldn't source them they would develop them in-house.
Funny that you say this after canada sanctioning wescams...
 

Osman

Committed member
Messages
277
Reactions
6 530
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
What is the range of çakır if launched from fighter jets or anka 3?
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,014
Reactions
10 7,705
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Funny that you say this after canada sanctioning wescams...
Dude why can't you see that there is Aselsan with an acceptable quality CATS and with the new 500C much more improved sporting a 5.6K TV resolution and all other benefits.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,735
Reactions
214 19,133
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Between Çakır and UAV-230, we'll have 2 options for different missions with 150+ km range for our heavy duty drones like Akıncı and Aksungur. How many air defense systems have longer range than that? Our drones can rain fire from relative safety with these missiles in a lot of situations except for the worst case ones, for which we just happened to be developing Anka-3.
There is also some very important points that needs to be remembered:

Çakır uses an air breathing engine for propulsion and is subsonic (0.75-0.85 Mach). It has been designed to sink a surface ship. At least take it out of commission. (it has a warhead weight of 70kg) It is expensive albeit not as much as an Atmaca. It has a sea hugging, maneuvering flight profile to stay away from enemy radar detection and CWIS fire.

UAV230 is a comparatively cheaper missile to attack surface positions with supersonic speeds. It relies on its high supersonic speed (around 4.2 Mach max) to avoid interception. it has less destructive power. (Warhead weight 42kg) . But carries more kinetic energy when striking it’s target due to it’s supersonic speed.

I am still pining for our TRG300 missiles being fired from F16 jets. Israeli f16s carry 4 of these to attack surface targets from stand off distances. They use them because they are “cheap” and “effective”.
It wouldn’t hurt to take a page out of their book once in a while.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom