TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

dBSPL

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Ambassador
Messages
2,675
Reactions
101 13,688
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Last edited:

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,482
Solutions
1
Reactions
17 4,116
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
I think the IWB on Anka 3 (well, on this prototype at least) is somewhere between 2.5 and 3 meters long. It is just a still from a video, at a weird angle but:

tolun.JPG


Tolun is 1.8 meters long (17 cm diameter) and it doesn't look like another one would fit behind it. If TAI's plan of giving some LRIP of this version to air force for testing holds on, I think Tolun might be the main munition for it.
 

Fuzuli NL

Experienced member
Germany Correspondent
Messages
3,136
Reactions
28 8,875
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
I made a better gif but for some reason it is not displayed in the forum. Anyway, I think the fact that Tolun used first in IWB tests is a very nice detail here. It can provide both precision engagement and area bombardment by releasing 4 or more in series. Imagine Anka-3 with even more better thermal trace and RAM coating.
It looks like anigifs are not supported in this platform.
 

dBSPL

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Ambassador
Messages
2,675
Reactions
101 13,688
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I think the IWB on Anka 3 (well, on this prototype at least) is somewhere between 2.5 and 3 meters long. It is just a still from a video, at a weird angle but:

View attachment 73129

Tolun is 1.8 meters long (17 cm diameter) and it doesn't look like another one would fit behind it. If TAI's plan of giving some LRIP of this version to air force for testing holds on, I think Tolun might be the main munition for it.
I think the angle of the cam makes it difficult to get a good measurement. My guess is that internal stations can fit two Toluns in tandem is designed (or rather should be designed) because as you said, it is highly likely that these SDBs are ANKA's main weapon configuration. The approximate weight of 8 Toluns is 1120kg/ 2470lb which is below the Anka-3's max lifting capacity.
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,482
Solutions
1
Reactions
17 4,116
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
I think the angle of the cam makes it difficult to get a good measurement. My guess is that internal stations can fit two Toluns in tandem is designed (or rather should be designed) because as you said, it is highly likely that these SDBs are ANKA's main weapon configuration. The approximate weight of 8 Toluns is 1120kg/ 2470lb which is below the Anka-3's max lifting capacity.
Yeah, I'll admit it is hard to judge.

But, your calculation about 8 Toluns is wrong, though not by much; Aselsan gives Sadak 4T loaded weight as 731 kg which makes two Sadak with 4 Tolun on each puts it just over the stated payload capacity of Anka-3 and stated payload capacity of its IWBs, which was 650 kgs each. Maybe it can use them with 3 Toluns on each, or use Sadak 2T with two bombs.

Also, Aselsan's Sadak brochures include a picture of Anka 3 in both dual and quadruple versions.

sadak.JPG
 

dBSPL

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Ambassador
Messages
2,675
Reactions
101 13,688
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Yeah, I'll admit it is hard to judge.

But, your calculation about 8 Toluns is wrong, though not by much; Aselsan gives Sadak 4T loaded weight as 731 kg which makes two Sadak with 4 Tolun on each puts it just over the stated payload capacity of Anka-3 and stated payload capacity of its IWBs, which was 650 kgs each. Maybe it can use them with 3 Toluns on each, or use Sadak 2T with two bombs.

Also, Aselsan's Sadak brochures include a picture of Anka 3 in both dual and quadruple versions.

View attachment 73130
The release mechanism in the IWB station may be different, it is a subject I do not really know, so I did not include the pylon weights. But under the wing, a pneumatic rack is a must. So the total ammunition weight is a very rough calculation, just an example to give an idea.
 
Top Bottom