TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

[Zafer]

Can the Kizilelma fire hypersonic missiles?

Gökhan is ramjet and it will possibly be fired from Kızılelma. I am not sure what speed is needed to start a ramjet engine but Kızılelma will go supersonic when it gets a better engine.

 

[Zafer]

Kaan will hopefully cover alot of bases and TUSAŞ can turn to cargo and passenger planes for a period of time while a 6th gen plane will go on a backburner until time is ripe to make one. Anka4 is probably meant to be an unmanned version of a 6th gen plane so backburner for a decade or so.

 

[Quasar]

We are all discussing on conjectures over an idea that was thrown in few years ago by Temel Kotil. He said something along the lines of “there would be Anka 4 to come yet. There will be a supersonic version.” looking at Anka-3.

Since then everyone has been guessing what this Anka-4 can be. There is no statement from Tusas regarding an Anka-4.

For one thing , if it is going to be a flying wing like Anka-3, It is not feasible for it to be supersonic. If it is going to be supersonic, then it will be in a more conventional design. Not a flying wing. We don’t even know if there is work being carried out on an “Anka-4”.
But if it is going to be built by Tusas, you can be sure that it will be built to a very high standard and will be a game changer class platform.

I agree with @Pilatino to have an expendable UCAV with long enough range to play both loyal wingman role and at the same time be able to penetrate deep in to enemy airspace and play the role of a kamikaze UAV. But süper Simsek is almost there. It can be carried along, under the wing of Anka-3, and when close enough, released to allow Anka-3 to return to full stealth mode whilst being stealthy itself, it can travel together to have suddenly two stealth UCAVs instead of just one attacking enemy positions.

Şüper Şimşek as Loyal Wingman > Kızılelma > Anka 4 would work for me.

TUSAŞ is very busy but I hope they can show us a capable Süper Şimşek and Anka 4 on spotlight at least in IDEF27'. That would end all my worries.

just for the sake of a better understanding and conceptualizing your ''Loyal Wingman'' What roles does a Loyal Wingman should perform and what capabilities does it have to have to be considered as a Loyal Wingman according to You? also would be intersting to hear the opinions of others as well

 

[Pilatino]

just for the sake of a better understanding and conceptualizing your ''Loyal Wingman'' What roles does a Loyal Wingman should perform and what capabilities does it have to have to be considered as a Loyal Wingman according to You?

Great question. For me, a Loyal Wingman isn’t defined by a single platform but by the roles and capabilities it must reliably deliver. In my view, a system qualifies as a Loyal Wingman if it can perform the following:

1. Risk-tolerant mission execution
It must be expendable enough to take the high-risk tasks that manned fighters or high-value UCAVs (like Kızılelma) shouldn’t.

2. Modular payload flexibility
The platform should be able to switch between sensors, EW payloads, decoy packs, or A2A/A2G weapons depending on the mission—Gambit-style modularity.

3. Autonomous teaming with manned or unmanned aircraft
It has to operate semi-autonomously alongside a parent aircraft, receive directives, and adapt to changing battlefield conditions.

4. Tactical roles such as:

Forward sensing / ISR

Electronic attack or jamming

Decoy / signature inflation

SEAD/DEAD support

Limited A2A interception

Saturation or distraction attacks


5. Lower cost and acceptable attrition
A Loyal Wingman must be strategically “expendable”—not a platform whose loss is operationally painful.

So whether it’s Süper Şimşek, Kızılelma, or a future Anka-4 derivative, the name matters less than these core characteristics. If a system fulfills them, I’d call it a Loyal Wingman.

 

[Zafer]

Kızılelma can have several versions from cheap to top notch. While its canards design is not top stealthy as well as its tail fins a stealthier plane may not be actually worth the effort if the latest radars will probably get to see even the stealthier planes better and better.

 

[Ahlatshah]

My main point is: WE NEED A "LOYAL WINGMAN" like system between Süper Şimşek and Kızılelma. The rest is unimportant tbh.

I agree that with all my heart. We need cheap (3-5 million $), no expensive or difficult to produce sensors and somewhat expandable/attritable drone. It has to be cheap, that is the key for so it can be produced at industrial scale. Also capable enough to can not be ignored, lets say "trouble makers" for enemy aircrafts and their drones.

We have reached such a level in drone technology and know how, the only thing we need someone with authority that determine the requirements and say "go ahead and do it" to our companies.

 

[Kitra]

According to GCSE Physics and Computer Science specifications,

signal latency is defined as the time delay between a signal being sent from one point (e.g., a transmitter) and when it is received at another point (e.g., a receiver).
Most times a signal may hop several times to reach its destination, especially if the destination is on the other side of earth.

Signal latency in physics is not specific to a single "hop" (a single segment of a journey) but is a cumulative measurement over the entire path the signal travels. The total latency of a signal is the sum of the delays incurred at each stage of its journey.

Thanks but that exactly the same definition as I gave. I never said anything of number of nodes jumps to reach an endpoint. For the discussion at hand, it is typically just one node jump, namely the sattelite between drone and ground control. It could obviously be more nodes, for example more sattelites or even other drones if you relay the signal around the world.

What seem to be the issue is not the definition of latency but reaction time to an incoming sudden threat. Here it could easily be up to 2 seconds as explained when you have a human in the loop. This is barely usable for close combat as I have expressed.

I think we all agree on the subject so this will be my last reply.