TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

Fuzuli NL

Experienced member
Germany Correspondent
Messages
3,468
Reactions
54 9,767
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,934
Reactions
236 20,443
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey

TUSAŞ General Manager Demiroğlu inspected the ANKA-3's domestically produced TF-6000 engine on the test platform.

1772497883878.jpeg

I hope we may see the TF6000 on an Anka-3 earlier than envisaged.
Logic dictates that by the time those LRIP birds are built, this engine will have reached the necessary maturity to be tested on the actual plane.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,482
Reactions
54 21,377
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
Our projects are nice and necessary to mature and progress, but considering what we're seeing around the frontiers now. I seriously hope we have the capacity to built 500-800 suicide drones a day if not more. As I don't think our TB2 and such would last long in a battlefield saturated with AD, A2A, drones and such.

Yet again we're seeing how important it is to have fighterjets to take out AD and strategic targets. Missiles just ain't going to cut it by themselves.
 

BalkanTurk90

Contributor
Messages
880
Reactions
5 1,317
Nation of residence
Albania
Nation of origin
Turkey
Our projects are nice and necessary to mature and progress, but considering what we're seeing around the frontiers now. I seriously hope we have the capacity to built 500-800 suicide drones a day if not more. As I don't think our TB2 and such would last long in a battlefield saturated with AD, A2A, drones and such.

Yet again we're seeing how important it is to have fighterjets to take out AD and strategic targets. Missiles just ain't going to cut it by themselves.
We need some 10 spy satellites and thousends of hypersonic missiles with range of 1000-4000 km and warhead of 1-10 ton . With Those No one can mess with us .
Buying eurofighter is just money spent for nothing as we are witness how easy is to shoot down non steath aircrafts from 4 rafales of india to 3 F15 of US .
We cound spent the money on very more important systems made in Turkiye 🇹🇷
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,482
Reactions
54 21,377
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
I disagree, firing off missiles from your own airspace to take out enemy targets is just as important. Especially if you can use a drone inside enemy airspace to locate and share the target location.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Kitra

Active member
Messages
140
Reactions
5 348
Nation of residence
Sweden
Nation of origin
Turkey
We need some 10 spy satellites and thousends of hypersonic missiles with range of 1000-4000 km and warhead of 1-10 ton . With Those No one can mess with us .
Buying eurofighter is just money spent for nothing as we are witness how easy is to shoot down non steath aircrafts from 4 rafales of india to 3 F15 of US .
We cound spent the money on very more important systems made in Turkiye 🇹🇷
We need nukes. The French are placing them in several EU countries. Others, such as Poland and Germany, are talking about developing their own. Others are are most likely considering them but not making it public. Then we have Israel.

Turkey MUST get nukes asap.
 

IC3M@N FX

Contributor
Messages
558
Reactions
3 27 1,133
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
The problem is that the moment a nuclear programme – whether official or unofficial – is launched, virtually all international pressure would be directed at us. The entire Middle East, including Israel, as well as Europe, the United States and Russia, would most likely oppose it, both economically, strategically and militarily.

It would therefore make more sense to focus on basic nuclear research and to have the launch vehicles ready for this, so that in an emergency we would be technically capable of developing nuclear weapons within two to three months. Japan, for example, is pursuing a similar model.

Personally, however, I would be more in favour of intensifying research into vacuum bombs even more and further increasing their effectiveness so that they could also be used as MIRV payloads, for example. There is still potential for development in this area to achieve the effectiveness of small tactical nuclear weapons without officially possessing nuclear weapons or triggering international reactions. Countries such as Greece and Israel could and would still protest, but it would not matter because we would be legally in the clear.
 

King_West

Active member
Messages
110
Reactions
2 449
Nation of residence
Belgium
The problem is that the moment a nuclear programme – whether official or unofficial – is launched, virtually all international pressure would be directed at us. The entire Middle East, including Israel, as well as Europe, the United States and Russia, would most likely oppose it, both economically, strategically and militarily.

It would therefore make more sense to focus on basic nuclear research and to have the launch vehicles ready for this, so that in an emergency we would be technically capable of developing nuclear weapons within two to three months. Japan, for example, is pursuing a similar model.

Personally, however, I would be more in favour of intensifying research into vacuum bombs even more and further increasing their effectiveness so that they could also be used as MIRV payloads, for example. There is still potential for development in this area to achieve the effectiveness of small tactical nuclear weapons without officially possessing nuclear weapons or triggering international reactions. Countries such as Greece and Israel could and would still protest, but it would not matter because we would be legally in the clear.
no, we need it for deterence. There is no deterence if you need 3 months to make one.
 
Top Bottom