You know Switzerlands inglorious posture during WW2. Your whole banking system is full of blood. You are not that peaceful, you pretend to look like
Russia routinely runs low on missiles. That's why they aren't able to consistently saturate Ukraine with missile attacks. If they could, they would. Unfortunately for Russia, most of their production is cruise missiles and Ukraine's air defense (including aerial air defense platforms) has reached the point that most city centers are fairly protected from cruise missiles. The latest volley Russian sent, were overwhelmingly intercepted. Ballistic Missiles are still a challenge because only Patriot and SAMP/T can intercept ballistic missiles among Ukraine's air defense systems and Ukraine only has 9-10 of those systems combined, spread out across the country.I remember hearing at the start of the war the Russians will be out of missiles any day now or any minute now, and still we have western leaders that state they outproduce the EU. In order for the Russians to be out of tanks and IFVs the Ukrainians have to destroy far more Russian equipment than their own, but you failed numerous times to show this. Just like another user here can't refute this.
Forecasts show Russia may overtake Japan in terms of GDP growth by 2030
Andrey Belousov opined that the Russian Central Bank’s key rate would remain at a high level so far, declining to 6-7% by 2027tass.com
now recognizes this. For the first time they sent anti-personnel landmines in a defense package, because they know that Ukraine can litter fields full of them and force Russian infantry to traverse through hell.
Hopefully not for a while yet. We need greater destruction of the Soviet stockpile before the war ends. Unfortunately, that will cost a lot of Ukrainian lives, so if they want to negotiate I fully support them...The war will be end soon. Russia will get the conquered areas. Europeans will pay the reconstruction. And BlackRock (
Long range missile attacks on Moscow: extremely unlikely to provoke a nuclear response IMO. I can imagine Putin thinking about detonating a low yield nuclear device - somewhere where it does no damage, like over the Arctic ocean - as a demonstration that he is prepared to escalate to nuclear but that is almost impossibly unlikely to me.
Sayed a non-Ukrainian people. And who is „we“?
If you think Russia is alone, you are very wrong.
Obviously when I write 'Russia + allies' I do not think Russia is alone.
Who are that allies which elaborate $4 trillion together with Russia?
Russia GDP around $2 trillion
1. you don't even bother to use your sources of information to gather how much Russian equipment gets destroyed in 24 hours here, but you sure do love to talk about what Ukraine can get instead every day and that is not a good sign either because it indicates Ukraine had their previous shit ordered all destroyed. If you want people here to take you serious give a daily update here for what Ukraine has done in 24 hours against the Russians other than posting reddit and oryx where they don't give timeframes of what they destroyed if they did report it you would make a list here. But you can't do that because I would draw my comparisons in return which would result in the Russians being the ones causing more casualties and destruction than what the Ukrainians can inflict back to the Russians.Russia routinely runs low on missiles. That's why they aren't able to consistently saturate Ukraine with missile attacks. If they could, they would. Unfortunately for Russia, most of their production is cruise missiles and Ukraine's air defense (including aerial air defense platforms) has reached the point that most city centers are fairly protected from cruise missiles. The latest volley Russian sent, were overwhelmingly intercepted. Ballistic Missiles are still a challenge because only Patriot and SAMP/T can intercept ballistic missiles among Ukraine's air defense systems and Ukraine only has 9-10 of those systems combined, spread out across the country.
Russia's missile supply got so lo that they had to get them from North Korea to keep up their infrastructure attacks.
Russia's not going to run out of missiles. That was never the actual analysis. The argument was and still is that they would be limited their production, which means that they can't fire nearly as many as they want and certainly not as often as they want. They produce a couple hundred combined cruise and ballistic missiles per month and they use them. That's where we're at.
Russia has the same problem with their armor. They had a ton of it stockpiled, but they're burning through it. Eventually, they'll run out of what they can reasonably pull from storage and restore. In that case, they'll be limited to their new production, which amounts to approximately 200 MBTs and 500 BMPs per year. They are losing their armor at a much quicker pace than that, which means that eventually they will either have to limit operations, or resort to even more substantial meat waves, into the teeth of artillery and the evolving use of drones.
USA
Interesting that you don’t mention the most important ally. China.
I thought China was being very careful to avoid getting sanctioned due to involvement with arms supply to Russia. I guess the US must be China's biggest export customer for consumer goods. Mind you, halting that trade would produce a severe inflationary shock to the US so perhaps the US is turning a blind eye?
"We" is the collective West that opposes Russia.
has delivered the NASAMs Air defense battery to Ukraine that it purchased more than a year ago. Canada has also delivered 300 air defense missiles to Ukraine, consisting of a mix of AIM-9M and AIM-7 missiles that can be used for NASAMs and FrankenSAM systems.
has sent another HAWK air defense battery to Poland, where it will then be transferred to Ukraine in the coming days. Spain has sent previous HAWK Batteries to Ukraine. 
Of course its a was for resources. Russia needs both natural resources and Ukrainian people to try to rebuild Soviet Union.
