is this true ??
I earlier predicted that the Taliban will eventually break under different faction due to differing interests.
some want sharia,some want int'l jihad, some want this and that. The Taliban leadership clearly could not satisfy all the demands.
Isis-K insurgency jeopardises Taliban’s grip on Afghanistan
New rulers accused of betraying Islam by jihadis intent on creating ideologically pure caliphatewww.ft.com
“The American war is over, but the Afghan wars are not,” said Avinash Paliwal, deputy director of the Soas South Asia Institute, and author of My Enemy’s Enemy, a book about Afghanistan.
The situation since the last departure of the coalition only solidify my arguments that the war will continue.
They said first ANA would make things stalemate they didn't last in 2 weeks and than said Panjshir is undefeated and even defeated superpowers and guess what happened they didn't lasted in 5 days in other news water is wet
The situation since the last departure of the coalition only solidify my arguments that the war will continue.
When the source call the Taliban for "punjab militant" you know the source is a liar
huh, more like 25-30K but ok, I'll leave that to make you happy.like 200 guys hiding somewhere will chellenge IEA with approx 900k-1m
huh, more like 25-30K but ok, I'll leave that to make you happy.
The thing is the Taliban were once itself are in the position of Isis-K today, The Taliban knows they could NEVER challenge the superiority of the coalition in open battles, so they did what Isis-K is doing right now, mainly bombing, targetted killing/ assassination and general economic warfare.
But in the defense of the coalition, they actually had a working and capable CT unit, something that the IEA don't.
Do YOU have any source citing that Taliban has 1million soldier ??What? 25-30k lmao. Did They fall from the sky these or just appear from nowhere
You don't understand how this works let me teach you the abc and 123 of this.
Example you can only end up in war when you have 2 elements opposing each other...
1. Syria you got actully 3 elements Rebels(FSA, HTS etc etc) SDF(YPG, Kurdish Militias) and SAA( Syrian armed forces) There is 3 entities facing each other.
Other examples NATO vs Taliban two entities or Libya etc etc.
But in Pakistan it is basically 1 entity vs obsecure elements who are far in between because they don't have support, numbers or anything off sort. Than you got Indonesia the same case it is one entity. ISIS is present in every country it is far and in between stuff.
They don't have even 500 guys in Afghanistan right now as it said an ISIS-K guy confirmed it to CNN interview they are an obsecure element and that is the ground reality
If you think the Taliban are battle hardened, wait until you realized that Isis-K are former Taliban themselves, so they are actually just as battle hardened.
ISIS is a dead entity not only in Afghanistan but allover the Islamic world
but allover the islamic world they have zero popularity and seriously all global ISIS could be just 5k and I mean worldwide forget Afghanistan this is how unpopular they are in truth. If you think ISIS will rise from anywhere it would be like believing in god descending on earth in the flesh.
not really, they're actually the most active Jihadi group currently availableMost people know ISIS has ended years ago and what is left now is just holdouts like these Japanese holdouts in WW2
not really, they're actually the most active Jihadi group currently available
Iraq in 2003 is actually very relatable to the Afghanistan of 2021.This is seriously none-topic
They don't even have people what you see of ISIS is only holdouts that is basically it but as an organistation it has ended back in 2017 it just lost popularity
Iraq in 2003 is actually very relatable to the Afghanistan of 2021.
none of the Talibs fanboys here do research on what they spew and they mostly lack the ability to do critical thinking. Most are here for the 'likes'
As I said before, the Talibs fanboys here lacks critical thinking and most of the time didn't do any research on what they type.
Isis central (Iraq and Syria) are pretty much active, in Syria Isis killed more Syrian troops than the rebels in Idlib. The highest kills recorded since ISIS no longer having people like you said is actually January this year.
Just because you did not hear much from them doesn't mean they don't exist.
Islamic State Under-Reporting in Central Syria: Misdirection, Misinformation, or Miscommunication?
The central media apparatus of the Islamic State group is mis-reporting on the activities of its cells in central Syria. Rather than exaggerating their capabilities, something that it is conventionally assumed to be doing all the time, its Central Media Diwan appears either to be deliberately...www.mei.edu“A Force They Haven’t Seen Before”: Insurgent ISIS in Central Syria
Immediately after the Syrian regime and its allies captured central Syria in late 2017, ISIS began waging an effective and deadly insurgency in the area. It first targeted urban centers along the western Euphrates before shifting focus in spring 2018 to the transport lines and mountains running...www.mei.edu
we are only talking Syria here, I'm not even in the mood to discuss ISIS-WA (West Africa) which is a more deadly force than ISIS central although at this rate, ISIS-K could overtake ISIS-WA because Taliban can't do CT.
You can't prove what has not yet happened will happen and the reality is they are an obsecure element almost illusionary. But aside from that lets agree to disagree and end it here