A donkey can't help but bray. Taliban will be Taliban as soon as international media leaves. Why do you think the Afghans are clamoring to leave? I mean throwing their babies across fences - how desperate does a parent have to be to do that?Taliban will pretend to look like good boy: Expert
ISTANBUL
The Taliban will pretend to look like a good boy to the international community to keep control of war-torn Afghanistan and its collapsed economy, a Turkish international relations professor has said.
“The country saw only wars in the last four decades. There is nothing more important to the Taliban than international aid and support. That’s why they visit Russia and China,” Ahmet Kasım Han told daily Hürriyet on Aug. 18.
According to the professor, to get the support in need, the Taliban promised China not to intervene in the Xinjiang Uyghur region. “They also gave Moscow a word that they would not support al-Qaida or ISIL in Central Asia,” Kasım said.
Taliban wants Afghanistan to be recognized as a legitimate country so they will behave like a good boy, he added.
When asked if they would succeed in being good boys, Kasım replied, “Unknown. As the answer is unknown, people get uneasy.”
According to the latest poll in Afghanistan, 70 percent of the population opposed living in a Taliban regime, he reminded.
Taliban will pretend to look like good boy: Expert - Türkiye News
The Taliban will pretend to look like a good boy to the international community to keep control of war-torn Afghanistan and its collapsed economy, a Turkish international relations professor has said.www.hurriyetdailynews.com
_________________________
Statistics are statistics. Unless people demonstrate on the streets in millions and news and reporters stream this event live. They'll just stay statistics. IMO
I hope PAF will improve on border control and security and just keep at it.
I certainly hope so. Rest of the world can say what they want but fact is Afghanistan and Pakistan are conjoined twins. Yeh sometimes we can hate each other but our geographic, ethnic and historical legacy will never be erased. I like to see the relationship with Britain and Ireland as analogous to Pakistan and Afghanistan. They also have had their issues but nobody can deny there is close historical bond between both reflected in the CTA open border treaty which since 1922 has allowed free movement of peope - Irish to Britain and vice versa.IEA is very serious about it's stragetic partnership with Pakistan and doesn't want to spoil it over anything. IEA will not waste even if the heavens and the earth were to fall upon each other the friendship with Pakistan and it's people. Times change, politics constantly change and the prirorty of today is just different and IEA recognize that there is great benefit in Pakistan and doesn't wanna spoil it or weakened it in any form or shape
Plenty of material here for the next Bollywod flick? Mission Afghanistan sounds nice?
Correct me if I am wrong, but weren't you pro secularism ?I certainly hope so. Rest of the world can say what they want but fact is Afghanistan and Pakistan are conjoined twins. Yeh sometimes we can hate each other but our geographic, ethnic and historical legacy will never be erased. I like to see the relationship with Britain and Ireland as analogous to Pakistan and Afghanistan. They also have had their issues but nobody can deny there is close historical bond between both reflected in the CTA open border treaty which since 1922 has allowed free movement of peope - Irish to Britain and vice versa.
Common Travel Area - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
There is such huge potential. A warrior people who have the courage and persistence to fight off three superpowers have lot of potential. I hope IEA joins Pakistan in a new effort to lay the seed of a regional economic block that binds Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan with Afghanistan being the bridge. The potential is immense.
Socio-economic development will itself bring about evolution of society naturally over time. So let that journey begin. Hope to see all of Central Asian, IEA leadership sat with PM Imran Khan by next year to practically apply his geo-economic vision.
If all of Europe can unite under EU, Arabs have their thing , there is ASEAN in South East Asia. It's time Pakistan also built up a economic alliance for win win for all.
So let us all wish the best and hope IEA have learned some lessons and are wiser then they were in their previous incarnation.
Why are Pakistanis so obsessed with Bollywood?Plenty of material here for the next Bollywod flick? Mission Afghanistan sounds nice?
Wait for the "whataboutism" reply in 3, 2, 1...Correct me if I am wrong, but weren't you pro secularism ?
I know that Pakistan was founded as a Islamic country, but your laws aren't based on sharia (right ?), though I recall @Saiyan0321 mentioning how even his law professors were sometimes interpreting things according to Sharia and not the actual Law.
How is IEA Sharia laws going to mesh with Pakistan's laws. Though I understand you imagine that each country will be governed by their own laws. You still have quite a handful of Pashtuns who may prefer IEA laws, thus creating a rift of sorts. (Does my question make sense ?).
A light hearted dig is not obession but your sudden found care for Afghan females does look rather obessive.Why are Pakistanis so obsessed with Bollywood?
100%Correct me if I am wrong, but weren't you pro secularism ?
That is not so clear but would require a chapter and then some clarify so leave that for now.I know that Pakistan was founded as a Islamic country
All of Pakistan's institutions and most of the laws have been inheritated from the British era with some slicing/dicing to make the 'boot fit'.but your laws aren't based on sharia
Two separate countries. No need for meshing.How is IEA Sharia laws going to mesh with Pakistan's laws.
That problem has always existed and is not particular to just Pashtuns. In Pakistan the religious right are always pushing for - well you know what I mean but they don't have electoral mandate. So that tension has always existed and will continue but my view is as long as progress is being made society only moves in one direction. That means inevitably people like me one day will be the typical as opposed to being atypical.ou still have quite a handful of Pashtuns who may prefer IEA laws, thus creating a rift of sorts. (Does my question make sense ?).
A very childish way to try and configure the discusion according to your frame of referance. No can do. Muzzling other people by using this charge is cheap and crude censorship.Wait for the "whataboutism" reply in 3, 2, 1...
Yeah I was also wondering!Assalamu'alaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh to Muslim
& Good day to Others
It's no use. How much you put logic. Someone just refuse to use logic, I doubt they have common sense. Logic or common sense nothing wants to go with them.A very childish way to try and configure the discusion according to your frame of referance. No can do. Muzzling other people by using this charge is cheap and crude censorship.
Well, I wish I could find something light hearted in women throwing their babies across fences to British soldiers in desperation and crack some joke about it but I can't.A light hearted dig is not obession but your sudden found care for Afghan females does look rather obessive.
Who muzzled you? If you have a crack at the expense of dead and desperate Afghans it is "light hearted". If someone else has a crack at your "whataboutism" it is "crude censorship".A very childish way to try and configure the discusion according to your frame of referance. No can do. Muzzling other people by using this charge is cheap and crude censorship.
Are you kidding me!NATO chief: The Afghan government is to blame for the military collapse
The defense alliance will now dig deeper into the causes of the Afghan army's record-breaking meltdown against the Taliban.
NATO will now investigate further why the Afghan military forces, despite so many years of preparations, could not better withstand the Taliban. Stock Photo: Niels Hougaard
A A
There is no doubt about when NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg will address the reason for the surprisingly rapid surrender of the Afghan military forces to the Taliban. The country's leadership is to blame, Stoltenberg said at a NATO meeting on Tuesday, writes the news agency Associated Press .
NATO has helped build Afghanistan's military of 300,000 men. But despite the fact that the number is superior to the Taliban forces, the defense of the country crumbled in a few days.
“The world has witnessed a political and military collapse so quickly that no one had thought it possible. Some of the Afghan military forces fought bravely. But it soon became clear that the country's leadership had failed in the fight against the Taliban and in creating a lasting peace for the country's inhabitants, "said Stoltenberg.
Over the years, the Secretary General of NATO has advocated that the Taliban would never succeed in winning on the battlefield but could only gain influence through negotiations.
Despite the restrictions in the Afghan government caused by i.a. corruption and managerial inadequacy, NATO continues to believe that training local forces in troubled countries is the best defense against extremist groups such as Islamic State. The decentralized strategy must also help keep Western forces out of external areas of conflict.
"We have to continue the fight against international terrorism. And NATO's efforts have weakened the al-Qaida network, "Stoltenberg pointed out, according to ABC News .
However, NATO needs to investigate further why the Afghan military forces, despite so many years of preparation, could not hold up better. But right now it is a matter of getting all foreigners out of the country as well as the Afghans who have assisted NATO in numerous ways.
NATO is a political and military defense cooperation consisting of 30 member countries. The organization was established in 1949 with the United States, Great Britain and France as the driving forces. The countries are obliged to defend each other in case of external attacks.
In recent years, NATO's focus has not least been on relations with Russia following the Russian invasion of the Crimean peninsula.
*Google translated*
Nato-chef: Der er én hovedårsag til den afghanske hærs nedsmeltning
Forsvarsalliancen vil nu grave dybere ned i årsagerne til den afghanske hærs rekordhurtige nedsmeltning mod Taliban.jyllands-posten.dk