This is certainly quadpackable at 550mm in width. Range numbers are "conservative" we went over that in the past.
Latest Thread
Others are based on experience of high thrust requirements air to air missile . Hisar isn't .The only reason is probably because the other missiles had more times to mature and evolve based on passed experiences, whilst we are only recently getting into these types of missiles. In time the weight to range ratio will probably be similar to equivelant systems.
I have feeling that we love over engineering when we produce defence weapon platforms.Our missiles are heavier and bigger yet compared to the other missiles have less range and altitude? Why is that?
If you connect two systems, it is possible that both systems can 'infiltrate' each other by communication port access.
Nothing is impossible. Expect that Russian give us source code.Impossible, we are talking about high tech defence product. Only thing that will be done is translating Russian software to Turkish console. Ther is no data-link and not possible. Second batch S-400 with ToT in software will be possible.
Nothing is impossible. Expect that Russian give us source code.
Does anyone knows the unit cost of Hisar-A+ and Korkut ?
Oh ok , thanks i think we will buy a chinese alternativeYou probably need to place a preorder to find out.
Because they are what?Oh ok , thanks i think we will buy a chinese alternative
İsmail Demir:
"With HİSAR-A+/O+, we have formed a containment envelope up to ~20 km. We will create a containment envelope of around 70 and 100 kilometers on the road with the SİPER. Then we will rise above it and move towards a system with the S-400 setting. "
The difference between canister length and missile length could be one meter.
Unfortunately, 550 cm is not even 'barely' quadpackable, you might have checked Mk41's width and divide it by two, in fact you were supposed to check maximum canister width which is 700~ to 750~ mm.This is certainly quadpackable at 550mm in width. Range numbers are "conservative" we went over that in the past.