But Baykar can? What kind of logic is this then?TAI cannot import turbofan engines for Göksungur. SSB will not allow imported engine. So they will wait for the TF-6000.
But Baykar can? What kind of logic is this then?TAI cannot import turbofan engines for Göksungur. SSB will not allow imported engine. So they will wait for the TF-6000.
It should be asked to the SSB management. Engineer friends say that SSB treats TAI quite badly in this regard.But Baykar can? What kind of logic is this then?
I know that, in fact i used to tell that somewhere around in this thread a year ago too.It should be asked to the SSB management. Engineer friends say that SSB treats TAI quite badly in this regard.
Any guess on when we might see a working prototype of TF-6000?
View attachment 35767
It is predicted that it can provide a maximum thrust of 27 kN for the TF-6000. The GE F404 produces 3 times more power than the TF-6000. (It is possible to estimate the size of the UCAV from here.) Therefore, considering that the engine is quite small, other options are not possible for TAI.
View attachment 35768
On the other hand, it is not 1-2 years for the TF-6000 project. We guess it's older.
Unfortunately, that issue remains unclear.Any guess on when we might see a working prototype of TF-6000?
It doesn't make sense for TAI to import engines when there is TEI.But Baykar can? What kind of logic is this then?
Fair competition? TAI should be allowed to receive engines from a verified source (verified by SSB) for a fair competition.It doesn't make sense for TAI to import engines when there is TEI.
Baykar on the other hand is not a state company and can act like a private sector company can.
Fair competition? TAI should be allowed to receive engines from a verified source (verified by SSB) for a fair competition.
TAI and Baykar should not necessarily compete as they are not making the exact same products. It would be a waste if they did at this level of industrialization. Maybe 15-20 years later but not just yet.Fair competition? TAI should be allowed to receive engines from a verified source (verified by SSB) for a fair competition.
Then only one logical explanation remains: TAI has been taken out from the unmanned business.In the whole it doesn't make sense. TAI is importing Ukrainian engines for ATAK-II. How does that work ?
Not reallyThen only one logical explanation remains: TAI has been taken out from the unmanned business.
TAI has more projects on their hands than they can handle right now.Then only one logical explanation remains: TAI has been taken out from the unmanned business.
Then only one logical explanation remains: TAI has been taken out from the unmanned business.
View attachment 35767
It is predicted that it can provide a maximum thrust of 27 kN for the TF-6000. The GE F404 produces 3 times more power than the TF-6000. (It is possible to estimate the size of the UCAV from here.) Therefore, considering that the engine is quite small, other options are not possible for TAI.
View attachment 35768
On the other hand, it is not 1-2 years for the TF-6000 project. We guess it's older.
Ibrahim Sunnetci had mentioned in one of his articles that the ts1400 core and body would yield a turbofan engine with a thrust level of 6000lbf dry and 9-10000lbf with AB. Size wise it would be quite a demanding case to make the said power level. But can be done by extending the length of the engine. (As in RR Adour)If it is 6000lb thrust engine, it's not an engine that's built up from TS1400 and likely an axial flow engine.
A turbofan engine based from TS1400 core would output around 1500-2000lb of thrust, and share similar dimensions as GE Honda HF120.
View attachment 35790
Honeywell F125 with 6280lb of thrust
View attachment 35791
The problem is HF120 has a relatively high bypass ratio 2.9:1 and very low turbine inlet temperature 860C, also it has reverse combustion chamber. Since its not meant for military applications but business jets, i think it is not wise to set it as an example for ts1400 core just because it has similar diameter.If it is 6000lb thrust engine, it's not an engine that's built up from TS1400 and likely an axial flow engine.
A turbofan engine based from TS1400 core would output around 1500-2000lb of thrust, and share similar dimensions as GE Honda HF120.
View attachment 35790
Honeywell F125 with 6280lb of thrust
View attachment 35791
Ibrahim Sunnetci had mentioned in one of his articles that the ts1400 core and body would yield a turbofan engine with a thrust level of 6000lbf dry and 9-10000lbf with AB. Size wise it would be quite a demanding case to make the said power level. But can be done by extending the length of the engine. (As in RR Adour)
Of course the innards of the ts1400 would have to be extensively altered to allow an axial flow compressor and turbine section as opposed to the radial flow of ts1400.
Also the dry thrust and the after burner thrust has to be made clear. If the quoted thrust is dry 6000lbf then we are talking about an engine with a power level of 9-10000lbf thrust.
Any jet propulsion engine has to be axial flow in order to create thrust. Some of the sections may be radial, to give better efficiency as radial flow improves heat propagation. But in essence a turbofan (or a turbo jet) is an axial flow gas turbine.
View attachment 35807
The drone in question has to be the TISU am I right? I don't know what else they might be talking about.