Per Mavivatan.net, Atmaca missiles will be integrated into 3 Ada(4th ship already have them), 4 Gabya and 4 Barbaros Class ships.
Forgive me but don’t you think it would be better to caption like it was a CGI render, not a real photo of the ship. every member and guest may not know the ship in detail, you know. My two centsIt is photoshoped.
Imagine a VLS system on top with hisar and vertical launched umtas and others. Ada class lacks in air defence, one RAM is not sufficient there are blind spots if hit by multiple missiles.
And visual confirmation. Project deadline is 2027. Makes me think they will be part of a greater retrofit for Gabya and Ada class ships. Probably not as extensive as Barbaros MLU but doubt Atmaca will be the only capability increase they will receive.Per Mavivatan.net, Atmaca missiles will be integrated into 3 Ada(4th ship already have them), 4 Gabya and 4 Barbaros Class ships.
Per Mavivatan.net, Atmaca missiles will be integrated into 3 Ada(4th ship already have them), 4 Gabya and 4 Barbaros Class ships.
8 warships should be produced to replace the Gabya frigates. Maybe we will hear some good news after the design stage is completed by end of 2024 for the TF-2000.Incomplete but lovely.
Source is Ümit Büyükyıldırım.
Could be a tad bit for the reloading mechanism.Can we integrate Atmaca's to the MK13?
Or will it be like Taiwanese OHP?
It will be interesting to see it either way.
4 early Gabyas are goners. Ones modded with VLS and Smart-L will probably stay for at least 15-20 more years.8 warships should be produced to replace the Gabya frigates. Maybe we will hear some good news after the design stage is completed by end of 2024 for the TF-2000.
Deliberately awarded to Selah Shipyard (now acquired by Ada Shipyard) by SSB. Unfortunately at the time it was awarded Selah was neither financially or technically capable of completing the orders. That was made under a plan, to homogenize roles of shipyards in military related orders and create new candidates who may export these later. But one may also see politics were heavily involved in the process.ÜTĞM. ARİF EKMEKÇİ (A-575) is finally delivered to the navy. Ekmekçi and her sister Güngör was to be delivered in 2016, within 26 months of the project start which was in 2014. Turns out even navy is not above horrible procurement choices.
Nice photoshop skills we can greatly make use of that .
VLS above Helicopter compartment
Adding on top VLS, making Corvette higher would cause stabilization problems?Nice photoshop skills we can greatly make use of that .
Incomplete but lovely.
Source is Ümit Büyükyıldırım.
It's in center of mass. But I do wonder how much weight could be placed on top of the helicopter compartment as there are all kind of things on I class which is similar to ada class.Adding on top VLS, making Corvette higher would cause stabilization problems?
I don’t think that it would present a huge engineering challenge to build a structure strong enough to hold a large, heavy mass on top of the hangar. Wouldn’t be easy but it can be done and extremely expensive and even might extend the overall construction time. Also the the size and weight added might make the ship top heavy and cause severe rolls on high seas.It's in center of mass. But I do wonder how much weight could be placed on top of the helicopter compartment as there are all kind of things on I class which is similar to ada class.
I don’t think that it would present a huge engineering challenge to build a structure strong enough to hold a large, heavy mass on top of the hangar. Wouldn’t be easy but it can be done and extremely expensive and even might extend the overall construction time. Also the the size and weight added might make the ship top heavy and cause severe rolls on high seas.
The question, I believe, should be why would you want an entire VLS unit sitting on top of helicopter hangar, of all places.
You have not studied or currently not studying naval architecture (that's partly what i hope to hear too), right?It's in center of mass. But I do wonder how much weight could be placed on top of the helicopter compartment as there are all kind of things on I class which is similar to ada class.
Apart from issues related to stability, that doesn't seem like a feasible solution to mount a full or short VLS on top of the hangar. The structure can be made to bear load of a VLS, but the position is too high to be adapted (unless the hangar itself is sacrificed for VLS). We may see Ukranian Ada Class approach and in a similar manner it is possible to fit up to 16 missiles on sides of the hangar - through not full VLS as in MILDAS but individual cold launched cells. If the cells are compact enough the space between the exhaust funnel and mast at the aft position can be utilized with a similar approach. I believe above the hangar should be spared for a CIWS or PDMS.Adding on top VLS, making Corvette higher would cause stabilization problems?
According to whom? Too much self-confidence present out there. However, i personally encourage you to study and work an concepts, we even have a dedicated thread around here to post personal concepts and discuss it with people.that is the best way.
It actually may turn out to be an engineering challenge if we start to dive into structural detailing and designing. However, it is pretty easy to design it "conceptually".I don’t think that it would present a huge engineering challenge to build a structure strong enough to hold a large, heavy mass on top of the hangar. Wouldn’t be easy but it can be done and extremely expensive and even might extend the overall construction time. Also the the size and weight added might make the ship top heavy and cause severe rolls on high seas.
I believe that currently we are in a good state (also as shown in the Libya campaign). But speaking for the future TN needs a second vessel in DIMDEG project (sistership of TCG Derya) and an extension to DIMDEG with autonomous systems. As well as ships smaller than DIMDEG build with lower costs (STM's FRT for example). and smaller ships for coastal refueling (2 are under construction but we may consider larger versions)I'm not an expert in anything defense really, but if history has shown us one thing (or even recent history in Ukraine) its that logistics win wars. How do we stand logistics wise in the Navy? Is the ratio of combat ships to support ships adequate?
Please enlighten me @Anmdt and resident naval experts.
That sounds to me like the most sensible approach. Can we use Sungur as an interim solution? While it obviously doesn't have the range of Hisar, it still has an 8 km range, and it already has a launcher that we can probably integrate with the ships easily.I believe above the hangar should be spared for a CIWS or PDMS.