Latest Thread
TB3's stall speed should be around 140kmh, depends on the loaded weight.I wonder what is the lowest speed tb3 can fly.
Ukranian side dragging feet, is what happening. Since ever.I would think that there maybe a different engine effort for Kızılelma than the TF6000. What is hapening with the Black Sea Shield now, I wonder
18k feet test is of the platform, not the engine. PD-170 is powering TB3, not being tested on it.Guys i know some users prefer pink lies over truth, but here is another reality check for you.
Pd170:
First ignition: 30.01.2017
First flight on anka: 27.12.2018
30k feet altitude flight test on aksungur: 13.11.2023
18k feet altitude flight test on tb3: 21.11.2023
Is it civilian engine: no
Is it large scale turbine engine: no
Is it being used in a serial production as of today 7 years after its first ignition: NO
Make of that what you will.
A plane is married to an engine, then where are the brides.
TAI UAV Systems Deputy General Manager Ömer Yıldız:
"ANKA-III is an approximately 7-ton aircraft, but its 150-kilogram version has been flying for a while. In the meantime, we will have 2 more aircraft, approximately 700-800 kilograms and over 1 ton."
IMO, a very very good question.A plane is married to an engine, then where are the brides.
Assuming we need thrust to weight ratio of 0.55 to 0.7, we would be needing TF/TJ engines capable to deliver 300 to 400 kgs and 700 to 1000 kgs. What are the available options?IMO, a very very good question.
Approaching to the deck of TCG Anadolu with that speed, touching landing gears after roughly 30 meters, then TB3 will have 200 meters to stop. I assume 150meters will suffice and it won't be an issue.TB3's stall speed should be around 140kmh, depends on the loaded weight.
It is also called "aborted landing" in aviation.The moments when the Bayraktar Kızılelma Unmanned Combat Aircraft touches the runway, known as 'Touch-and-Go' in aviation, and takes off again without stopping!
I don't think there will only be downscaled variants. With the dual TF-6000, or with again single engined if a mid-thrust class engine emerges later in this engine program, an aircraft with a much higher MTOW and possible operational range than the current ANKA-3 is definitely in the planning. If we can prove this type of stealth platform design and put it into active service, the appetite for acquiring platforms for many other specific mission types, from penetrator bomber to air-refueling drone tankers, will increase. Of course, the desire to acquire a platform alone is not the decisive criterion here; but the ANKA-3 provides a major technological breakthrough that will bring a completely new perspective to the Turkish aviation industry, and this accumulation itself will raise the bar.
TAI UAV Systems Deputy General Manager Ömer Yıldız:
"ANKA-III is an approximately 7-ton aircraft, but its 150-kilogram version has been flying for a while. In the meantime, we will have 2 more aircraft, approximately 700-800 kilograms and over 1 ton."
I don't think there will only be downscaled variants.
- ANKA 3 will be a family of flying wing drones, there will be lighter and heavier versions, as well as a naval version (the idea of a naval version was known during the design phase)
Apparently, especially for eurofighters too, KC135 supports an attachment that switches the boom for a basket probe.Quite frankly in its current form seeing Anka III in air refueling role is quite optimistic since for instance just a drop tank of F 16 carries 300-600 gallons i.e 1000 to 2000 kg ... ANKA III is unmaned so it can only carry air refueling basket which requires an air refueling probe at reciving end...so far non of our aircrafts has air refueling probe.
That's too much hassle and would mean a KC135 with the basket adapter cannot refuel F-16's or E7s in flight. Adapter works for singular missions but not at bulk.Apparently, especially for eurofighters too, KC135 supports an attachment that switches the boom for a basket probe.
Given the number of orders they have received within last 2 years, it is good to see that they increased their production capacity.
Baykar Makina produces 1 Bayraktar TB-2 per day.
Actually the text is not consistent within itself. It uses both "produces" and "can produce" within the same text which mean totally different things. Considering the total orders for the next years, they are probably not utilizing full capacity (1 tb2/day) currently, so I would expect "produces" to be incorrect. Turkish defense media needs a huge overhaul.
Baykar Makina produces 1 Bayraktar TB-2 per day.