If the AKINCI is ready to go on a mission with two fully loaded pneumatic quad racks, our missile truck is ready
Sadak 2T (110kg , 388kg fully loaded)
Sadak 4T (175kg , 731kg fully loaded)
Sadak 4T is carried under the belly of Akinci, as it can’t carry that load on wings.
Akinci has around 950kg payload capacity to carry externally. I doubt if it can manage 2 x Sadak 2T on wings as well.
As with different engines, Akinci has different payload capacities. But even with the 2 x PT6 engines giving 2 x 850HP power, it has a maximum of 1500kg payload capacity, 400kg of it being for internal. It has also be remembered that the wing structure can manage lower weight handling than it’s belly.
I know we all would like this bird to perform better. But there is reality and there is wishful thinking. 4T Sadak fully loaded is 731kg. You can’t have these on the wings. Under belly of Akinci will only accommodate a single Sadak-4T. (Unless we come up with a lighter Sadak-8T, which can detract from Akinci’s max altitude and endurance)If the PT-6 can provide enough take-off power to lift two quad racks loaded, I think that sooner or later the carry limit for the main inner stations of the aircraft will be increased. Please correct me if I am wrong, but this section is already being produced monolithically with the main fuselage. We know that the under fuselage station has a 2000 lb standard.
Sadak also has a double version, so, in theory Akıncı could carry 4 Tolun under its carriage and might be able to carry 2 under each inner pylons.Not sure about a SADAK-8T but I'm pretty sure a SADAK-6T is possible.
The central pylon is rated for 1+ tonnesa
View attachment 70645
Where is the next UAV that pushes the boundry of 60k-72k ft ?
Don’t we need a SAR radar for that? Many of our UAVs that were shot down were flying below cloud cover because they couldn’t see or target through the clouds using just the EOTS.I think it's important that our UAV can fly above the reach of shoulder launched AD systems, and other SRAD. Otherwise we'll be losing lots of UAV just for kicks.
Don’t we need a SAR radar for that? Many of our UAVs that were shot down were flying below cloud cover because they couldn’t see or target through the clouds using just the EOTS.
And? Here is a brochure for the Altay, 0 out of 2,378 tanks in our inventory. SAR radars are installed on very few of our UAVs.AESA SAR POD - ASELSAN
www.aselsan.com
Pods are fine and all but as said, its a third party solution to a greater issue. We'll still need a tailor made UAV for the role. And indeed, SAR pods seem too specialized and not enough in service.AESA SAR POD - ASELSAN
www.aselsan.com
View attachment 70707
Roketsan Tayfun;
more than 280km range,
6.5m length,
2300kg weight,
better than10m CEP,
hypersonic cruise speed
Well, even Bora missile briefly touches the domain of hypersonic in it’s suppressed trajectory.I was not aware that we had propulsion power that could push payload in the hypersonic category.
I know we talked alot about it in the past threads, but surely we haven't developed a new engine that does it, right ?
Are they feeding more fuel to existing engine to push it into hypersonic ?
The most North Korean truck in the market. Damn it is ugly.
It actually looks pretty nice imo.