Considering how we would encounter the adversaries in a hypothetical war, I say putting the same kind of payload on aging Yıldırım missiles so that Tayfun production line won't be strained for something very specific
Latest Thread
These are not that much effective in modern warfare. Runways are easy to repair. It's better to hit more critical buildings in an airbase, like planes and munitions.Do we have any equivalent to this?
JP233 was solely used against runways.Do we have any equivalent to this?
Yeah, I think US attacked a Syrian airbase with missiles with similar warheads while Trump was president and planes continued flying from there either the same day or the next.These are not that much effective in modern warfare. Runways are easy to repair. It's better to hit more critical buildings in an airbase, like planes and munitions.
Do we have any equivalent to this?
It isn’t, but had stated in the past that it would no longer produce cluster munitions. New realities necessitate a change in that policy.Maybe there is a version of DEMET for this purpose.
Türkiye is not part of this:
Home
www.clusterconvention.org
View attachment 70830
NEB can be used against runways too.
but had stated in the past that it would no longer produce cluster munitions.
Of course. You are as valuable as your word. We said we wouldn't, and we didn't. All our old stocks are also under NATO books, there's nothing to suggest Turkey produced cluster munitions after 90s, although it has shown the capability to develop them with Demet years ago. Ones we sent to Ukraine were older 155mm MKE rounds, license built in Turkey.Do you believe that?
Do we have any equivalent to this?
"it has not used, produced, imported, or transferred cluster munitions since 2005, and does not intend to do so in the future."