USA United States Air Force

Bhartiya Sainik

Active member
Messages
79
Reactions
14 96
Nation of residence
India
Nation of origin
India
Another artist's good imagination:
> This is tandem tri-plane, but putting canard just in front of intake could obstruct airflow, unless onlyouter 2/3rd or half of canard moves.
> Bcoz of darkened flag in poster, some people are still speculating small all-moving rudders.
> Like Bird-of-Prey the wing can still be slightly tilted up with with drooped winglet, but He forgot to allign the bend-axis longitudinally parallel to length. Such wing adds to stability while a fighter needs to be unstable for agility.
> Such platipus like flatter nose could mean lesser pitch agility & little more RCS return by nose.
> Overall this looks like 1 engine exportable jet. I wonder how in Trump's words "nothing even comes close from speed to maneuverability to payload" & this is "most advanced, capable, lethal".

1743064279776.jpeg

1743064285958.jpeg

1743064290996.jpeg
 

Bhartiya Sainik

Active member
Messages
79
Reactions
14 96
Nation of residence
India
Nation of origin
India
Another artist imagines F-47 little longer, dihedral wing with anhedral winglet.
The wing root is shifted back & intakes are also much behind, not enough space for serpentine duct, so engine would be visible.
Engine bays are apart & middle space filled like in Su-57, so might have tandem IWBs.
Perfect side, front, bottom images not available.


1743148973943.jpeg



1743148991879.jpeg
 

Bhartiya Sainik

Active member
Messages
79
Reactions
14 96
Nation of residence
India
Nation of origin
India
Some 3D artist imagined & made 3D model & animation of F-47, whose fuselage looks like F/A-XX concept, upward tilted wings remind of Bird-of-Prey, engine bay hump reminds of YF-23.
So F-47 NGAD = F/A-XX + BoP + YF-23. :LOL: 🤦‍♂️
I'm putting a smaller collage as the images are huge, bigger than the collage.

View attachment 74224



Some selected screenshots from animation showing specific angles to show airframe shape, parts:

View attachment 74225

The artist has updated a modified version w/o canard stating that USN doesn't wan't canards.
Well, this is opposite expectation if USAF wants canards but not USN bcoz the wing leading edge has high sweep angle means higher landing speed w/o canard.
I'm posting a collage again as the images are huge.
> Perhaps the nose & chine need more blending like in Rodrigo Avellas F/A-X concept for bigger & wider coverage radar.
> Wings have been made little Lambda style than Delta earlier.
> There doesn't seem to be any winglet.
> Intakes have DSI. The intake lower edge is ahead of upper edge (blended with wing root). This can be a problem if high AoA & tight turn is desired as some air can slip out over wing causing insufficient air flow & compressor stall. Giving aux-intakes below or moving lip like in EF-2000 would increase complexity & RCS.
> Parallel IWB not tandem & SWB have been marked.
> Engine bays quite far separated, the duct may not be serpentine enough, engine would be visible.
> Exhaust look like that of YF-23 w/o TVC.

It seems that this is going to become a standard look of all 6gen jets. ✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️
Blame game already started on who's copying whom‍. :ROFLMAO:🤦‍♂️ It is bcoz of planform shaping fundamental started since 5gen.

1743233869323.jpeg
 

Follow us on social media

Latest posts

Top Bottom