Live Conflict Ukraine-Russia War

Relic

Experienced member
Canada Correspondent
Messages
2,009
Reactions
15 2,966
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
Canada
Wasting money on air defence, while there is no talk of Taurus, Tomahawks or other long range missiles, which is what Ukraine actually needs.

No amount of Patriots, NASAMS, IRIS-T or any other air defence systems will be able to stop Russia from launching hundreds of drones daily at Ukraine. There is only one way to stop that, and that is based on offensive capabilities. The Russian MIC needs to be targeted inside Russia. Otherwise, we will continue to see nightly waves of drones and missiles exhausting Ukraine’s air defenses, no matter how many new missiles the West sends.

Israel bombed Iran in order to stop the missiles coming. The same must be done with Russia. Anything else is just wasting money down the drain, while Ukraine continues to lose lifes.
The systems you named are largely not designed, nor are they being regularly used to intercept drones. Those systems are imperative to protect Ukrainian cities, critical infrastructure and military sites from cruise missiles and ballistic missiles. Sure, they'll target the odd drone as required, but Ukraine has a number of other cheeper systems designed for that purpose. Everything including Gepard, Skynex, F-16s, Mirage-2000, Mig-29, SU-27, Crotale, Manpads, FrankenSAM, ASRAAM, Starstreak, Martlett, Avenger, etc, etc are primarily used to shoot down drones.

I continue to believe that Ukraine needs a robust and diverse air defense network AND additional offensive strike capability. And not just long range missiles, but all kinds of armor, artillery and medium range weapons as well.

There is room for the purchase / donation of both..
 

contricusc

Contributor
Messages
694
Reactions
11 1,008
Nation of residence
Panama
Nation of origin
Romania
The systems you named are largely not designed, nor are they being regularly used to intercept drones. Those systems are imperative to protect Ukrainian cities, critical infrastructure and military sites from cruise missiles and ballistic missiles.

I know what those systems are designed for. My point is, Ukraine’s biggest problem right now is not the few ballistic missiles that Russia fires at them. Yes, they need to be able to defend from those too, but it is ridiculous that the bulk of the money spent on arming Ukraine goes to intercepting those few ballistic missiles, instead of going to offensive capabilities that are required in order to destroy Russia’s weapons factories, oil refineries, etc.

The problem with those high end anti air systems is the price tag. They are extremely expensive for the tiny role they play in the conflict. If the West is willing to spend that much money for Ukraine, and provide them with high end systems, they should focus that spending on offensive missiles, that can do a lot more damage to Russia and have a much greater influence on the war.

The West spent many billions of dollars on Pariots and their missiles for Ukraine, but were unwilling to provide the weapons to take down the Kerch bridge, which would have cost a fraction of that.

What bothers me is the missalocation of the resources. They consume the most money on the least important and most expensive systems.

Even when talking about air defence, Russia is now sending hundreds of drones daily, which cause the most casualties among the civilian population now. For that, you need cheap air defense systems in bulk. Two or three additional Patriots will not resolve anything, but cost a fortune.
 

Soldier30

Experienced member
Russian Armed Forces News Editor
Messages
2,066
Reactions
12 1,149
Nation of residence
Russia
Nation of origin
Russia
Footage of strikes by Russian Kh-101 cruise missiles with cluster warheads in Chernivtsi. The missiles were presumably launched by Tu-95 and Tu-160 aircraft. The Kh-101 missile has a range of up to 5,500 km and a 400 kg warhead.

 

Soldier30

Experienced member
Russian Armed Forces News Editor
Messages
2,066
Reactions
12 1,149
Nation of residence
Russia
Nation of origin
Russia
Footage of the destruction of Ukrainian drones, of an unknown type, by Russian Ka-52 helicopters. The location of the shooting is not reported.

 

Woland

Committed member
Moderator
Ukraine Moderator
Messages
224
Reactions
10 665
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Ukraine
US tells Switzerland its order of Patriots will be delayed as Ukraine gets priority. Meanwhile, the Swiss defense ministry has just said that it was informed by the US Department of State that its deliveries of Patriot missile systems will be delayed as a result of its decision to reprioritize deliveries to Ukraine.

The Swiss statement says that its five Patriot systems, ordered in 2022, were meant to be delivered between 2027 and 2028, but the US announcement means that they will be “affected by the new prioritization” and delayed further.

“It is currently unclear how many systems will be affected and whether the delivery of guided missiles will also be affected. No statement can be made at this stage regarding the exact timing and any further implications for Switzerland. Clarifications are ongoing,” the statement added.

Basically what this means is that the five Patriot systems in production that were supposed to go to Switzerland will be redirected to countries that provide theirs to Ukraine. Right now we know of the intention of Germany to send two of theirs, and that Norway is willing to pay for one system.
 

Soldier30

Experienced member
Russian Armed Forces News Editor
Messages
2,066
Reactions
12 1,149
Nation of residence
Russia
Nation of origin
Russia
Footage of Russian Iskander-M missiles and Geran-2 drones striking a Ukrainian command post and launcher with the Lyuty UAV. The video was filmed near the village of Shostka, Sumy Oblast, Ukraine.

 

Relic

Experienced member
Canada Correspondent
Messages
2,009
Reactions
15 2,966
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
Canada
US tells Switzerland its order of Patriots will be delayed as Ukraine gets priority. Meanwhile, the Swiss defense ministry has just said that it was informed by the US Department of State that its deliveries of Patriot missile systems will be delayed as a result of its decision to reprioritize deliveries to Ukraine.

The Swiss statement says that its five Patriot systems, ordered in 2022, were meant to be delivered between 2027 and 2028, but the US announcement means that they will be “affected by the new prioritization” and delayed further.

“It is currently unclear how many systems will be affected and whether the delivery of guided missiles will also be affected. No statement can be made at this stage regarding the exact timing and any further implications for Switzerland. Clarifications are ongoing,” the statement added.

Basically what this means is that the five Patriot systems in production that were supposed to go to Switzerland will be redirected to countries that provide theirs to Ukraine. Right now we know of the intention of Germany to send two of theirs, and that Norway is willing to pay for one system.
It makes complete sense that Switzerland's 5 PAC 3 MSE batteries would be delayed. They're a neutral country that routinely delayed and / or vetoed the transfer of weapons to Ukraine because of Swiss ownership or components. It makes sense that they would be have delays imposed on the procurement of their systems in similar fashion. Seems like the right thing to do!
 

Soldier30

Experienced member
Russian Armed Forces News Editor
Messages
2,066
Reactions
12 1,149
Nation of residence
Russia
Nation of origin
Russia
The first footage of combat work in Ukraine, the new Russian heavy self-propelled flamethrower TOS-3 "Dragon". TOS-3 "Dragon" is produced by "Omsktransmash", it was created on the chassis of the T-80BV tank, which provides 25% greater mobility compared to the TOS-1A "Solntsepek", based on the T-72 tank. The TOS-3 "Dragon" now has only 15 guides for launching missiles. The TOS-1 "Buratino" has 30 guides for missiles, the TOS-1A "Solntsepek" - 24, and the wheeled TOS-2 "Tosochka" has already made 18. Reducing the number of guides reduces the risk of detonation of ammunition when attacking drones. In the West, the TOS-3 fire system is compared in effectiveness to tactical nuclear weapons. The extended launch container allows the use of modernized thermobaric rockets TBS-3M at a range of up to 15 km. TOS-3 "Dragon" is equipped with additional protection, armor and electronic warfare equipment.

 

FiReFTW

Committed member
Messages
173
Reactions
2 175
Nation of residence
Switzerland
Nation of origin
Switzerland
It makes complete sense that Switzerland's 5 PAC 3 MSE batteries would be delayed. They're a neutral country that routinely delayed and / or vetoed the transfer of weapons to Ukraine because of Swiss ownership or components. It makes sense that they would be have delays imposed on the procurement of their systems in similar fashion. Seems like the right thing to do!

Switzerland is much more important than a corrupted ex soviet country of Ukraine, sad that so many are so blinded by their hate for Russia to not realize that.

The west is what matters, Europe is what matters.... not Ukraine, nobody from any of us has anything to do with Ukraine, its just a corrupt ex soviet country, its only because of this blind hatred towards Russia that Europe blindly supports it even tho its destroying its own economy and competitiveness with it, they are useless and st*pid, sadly.
 

contricusc

Contributor
Messages
694
Reactions
11 1,008
Nation of residence
Panama
Nation of origin
Romania
Switzerland is much more important than a corrupted ex soviet country of Ukraine, sad that so many are so blinded by their hate for Russia to not realize that.

Ukraine is bigger than Switzerland. It is more important in the long game.

Switzerland is a small vassal state of the EU, abiding by its regulations but without a seat at the table where decisions are made. It is surrounded by much more powerful countries and its army is useless, as it won’t fight any war, so it is natural to delay their Patriots, as they serve no purpose other than boosting sales of the US MIC.

The EU should actually tell Switzerland to buy EU made weapons, so that it boosts European economies, not the US.

The west is what matters, Europe is what matters.... not Ukraine

Anything West of Russia is Europe. Ukraine is West of Russia, it is European, and it matters.

nobody from any of us has anything to do with Ukraine, its just a corrupt ex soviet country, its only because of this blind hatred towards Russia that Europe blindly supports it even tho its destroying its own economy and competitiveness with it, they are useless and st*pid, sadly.

Ukraine is doing Europe a big favor by weakening Russia. We should support them more and thank them for their sacrifice. Also, when they will join the EU, they will be one of the bigger countries, and with a very strong military, so they will be one of the important members.
 

Woland

Committed member
Moderator
Ukraine Moderator
Messages
224
Reactions
10 665
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Ukraine
Switzerland is much more important than a corrupted ex soviet country of Ukraine, sad that so many are so blinded by their hate for Russia to not realize that.

The west is what matters, Europe is what matters.... not Ukraine, nobody from any of us has anything to do with Ukraine, its just a corrupt ex soviet country, its only because of this blind hatred towards Russia that Europe blindly supports it even tho its destroying its own economy and competitiveness with it, they are useless and st*pid, sadly.
An absurd, short-sighted take. Ukraine’s 800,000-strong army is the largest in Europe, the most experienced in modern warfare, and battle-hardened through 10 years of war with Russia. It is the most powerful land army in Europe, and would strengthen any alliance. With Ukraine on Europe's side, European countries are protected from a revanchist Russia while the US pivots its forces and resources from Europe to Asia.

However, if Ukraine falls or feels betrayed by Europe, history has important lessons. Italy fought with the allies in WWI, but after feeling cheated and betrayed at the Paris Peace Conference, fought with the axis powers in WWII. European countries that used to be fierce rivals are now allies, while Japan is an ally to the country that dropped two atomic bombs on it.

Russia’s recent history offers an even more dire warning. Of the three countries Putin invaded, two now have pro-Russian governments. During the First Chechen War (1994-1996), Chechnya was victorious. The war ended with Russia signing a treaty recognizing the Chechen government. In 1999, Russia invaded Chechnya again, this time successfully. Today, Chechens fill the ranks of the Russian army. Georgia was invaded by Russia in 2008, and parts of it continue to be under Russian occupation. And yet today, through propaganda, vote rigging, and the suppression of opposition, Georgia has a pro-Russian government.

The nightmare scenario would be the combined armies of Russia and Ukraine, the only two nations with experience in modern warfare, this time supplied by the industrial might of China, marching on Europe, while China invades Taiwan.

So by all means, if you want to risk Europe losing WWIII, abandon Ukraine while Switzerland gets Patriots it doesn't need. Instead of Ukraine being Europe's shield, Europe will have to drastically increase military spending to be able to stop Russia without either Ukraine or the US. The alternative, of course, is much cheaper and safer.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,541
Reactions
190 18,109
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
An absurd, short-sighted take.
I fully agree with everything you have written in your post. Ukraine needs to stay free and on the side of the West.
Switzerland is a small vassal state of the EU.
It is surrounded by much more powerful countries and its army is useless

However, Switzerland is not a weak country militarily. It’s geography is its best ally and feature against any potential invader.
Every able bodied man in Switzerland and any woman volunteers are in the armed services in Switzerland after the age of 18. They keep their guns and kit with them at home at all times until they are released from the armed services duties. Hence they are ready to join their units at short notice and they go in to train at certain intervals to refresh their capabilities.
Switzerland is a rich country and have a large military. They have over 900000+ personnel ready for active duty at short notice.

Swiss GDP is 880billion dollars. They annually spend 6.5 billion on defence.

Don‘t underestimate them. They don’t need EU or anybody to defend them.

They are however the most militarily neutral country in the world. They will not side with any country. And they will not attack any country. But that doesn’t mean they will not defend themselves.
 

FiReFTW

Committed member
Messages
173
Reactions
2 175
Nation of residence
Switzerland
Nation of origin
Switzerland
Ukraine is bigger than Switzerland. It is more important in the long game.

Switzerland is a small vassal state of the EU, abiding by its regulations but without a seat at the table where decisions are made. It is surrounded by much more powerful countries and its army is useless, as it won’t fight any war, so it is natural to delay their Patriots, as they serve no purpose other than boosting sales of the US MIC.

The EU should actually tell Switzerland to buy EU made weapons, so that it boosts European economies, not the US.



Anything West of Russia is Europe. Ukraine is West of Russia, it is European, and it matters.



Ukraine is doing Europe a big favor by weakening Russia. We should support them more and thank them for their sacrifice. Also, when they will join the EU, they will be one of the bigger countries, and with a very strong military, so they will be one of the important members.
Size has nothing to do with importance or strength or anything, Russia is the biggest country in the world so what?

Switzerland is one of the most economically strong countries in the world, extremely safe, strong and underrated military, best nature in the world etc etc... Its also part of schengen and "west europe".

Europe should care about their own countries no foreign countries that have nothing to do with them, you are completely blinded by the fact that Europe is spending a ton of money on Ukraine and that their economy went to sh*t in the past years, just look at the statistics, this war and everything related to it (decisions of Europe also with all the sanctions on Russia etc) is absolutely destroying the European economy and competitiveness.

You don't give a sh*t you live in Panama, so why should you care.

But Europe needs to look for its OWN INTERESTS in order to have the best economy and standard and life, just like the USA is looking for its OWN INTERESTS even if they keep throwing tarrifs and stuff on friendly countries, in the end they are looking for their OWN interests, Europe should learn from that and maybe start doing the same.
 

FiReFTW

Committed member
Messages
173
Reactions
2 175
Nation of residence
Switzerland
Nation of origin
Switzerland
An absurd, short-sighted take. Ukraine’s 800,000-strong army is the largest in Europe, the most experienced in modern warfare, and battle-hardened through 10 years of war with Russia. It is the most powerful land army in Europe, and would strengthen any alliance. With Ukraine on Europe's side, European countries are protected from a revanchist Russia while the US pivots its forces and resources from Europe to Asia.

However, if Ukraine falls or feels betrayed by Europe, history has important lessons. Italy fought with the allies in WWI, but after feeling cheated and betrayed at the Paris Peace Conference, fought with the axis powers in WWII. European countries that used to be fierce rivals are now allies, while Japan is an ally to the country that dropped two atomic bombs on it.

Russia’s recent history offers an even more dire warning. Of the three countries Putin invaded, two now have pro-Russian governments. During the First Chechen War (1994-1996), Chechnya was victorious. The war ended with Russia signing a treaty recognizing the Chechen government. In 1999, Russia invaded Chechnya again, this time successfully. Today, Chechens fill the ranks of the Russian army. Georgia was invaded by Russia in 2008, and parts of it continue to be under Russian occupation. And yet today, through propaganda, vote rigging, and the suppression of opposition, Georgia has a pro-Russian government.

The nightmare scenario would be the combined armies of Russia and Ukraine, the only two nations with experience in modern warfare, this time supplied by the industrial might of China, marching on Europe, while China invades Taiwan.

So by all means, if you want to risk Europe losing WWIII, abandon Ukraine while Switzerland gets Patriots it doesn't need. Instead of Ukraine being Europe's shield, Europe will have to drastically increase military spending to be able to stop Russia without either Ukraine or the US. The alternative, of course, is much cheaper and safer.
Your from Ukraine, obviously your going to say that, its normal and to be expected.

Your take is absolutely mad and has no logic and sense, comparing italy from ww1 to ukraine. 1st of all Russia will never attack NATO European countries, 2nd to assume Ukraine would side with Russia against Europe like Italy in ww2 is more crazy than a fantasy novel.

WW3 will never happen.

Also Europe will already increase its military spending by ALOT, wasting even more money that could be used for economy, healthcare, infastructure etc... regardless of Ukraine.

Ukraine has nothing to do with me, nothing to do with my country and nothing to do with any of the EU countries, those are just facts.

Should Russia defeat Ukraine? Take over huge amounts of territories? Take whole Ukraine even?

Of course not, but the fact is this war happened, its done, it can't be undone, now everyone has to face the consequences, but the best thing for absolutely EVERYONE, most improtantly Europe, USA... everyone.. even Ukraine and Russia, is to END THE WAR, not push TONS and TONS of weapons into the war and make it last another 5 years.
And there will be no winners in this war, both Ukraine and Russia will need to give up alot, but thats how it is.
 

contricusc

Contributor
Messages
694
Reactions
11 1,008
Nation of residence
Panama
Nation of origin
Romania
Size has nothing to do with importance or strength or anything, Russia is the biggest country in the world so what?

Are you serious? Of course size matters. Look at how much damage Russia can do despite being a backwards country, just because of its size. If Russia was the size of Ukraine, it would had started no wars and wouldn’t have been a threat to anyone, but because it is big, it is creating problems for a whole continent.

Switzerland is one of the most economically strong countries in the world, extremely safe, strong and underrated military, best nature in the world etc etc... Its also part of schengen and "west europe".

Yes, Switzerland is part of Western Europe and it is very wealthy and beautiful, but aside from that, it has no strategic importance, as it is a landlocked neutral country. You didn’t join the EU despite being in the heart of Europe, so why should anyone prioritize your military needs when you are neutral, not part of NATO and not part of the EU?

Europe should care about their own countries no foreign countries that have nothing to do with them, you are completely blinded by the fact that Europe is spending a ton of money on Ukraine and that their economy went to sh*t in the past years, just look at the statistics, this war and everything related to it (decisions of Europe also with all the sanctions on Russia etc) is absolutely destroying the European economy and competitiveness.

First of all, the foreign country you are talking about is a future EU country, so it is natural for Europe to care about it and help it overcome its problems. When it will join the EU, it will not be a foreign country anymore, but an EU member state, so more integrated than Switzerland.

As for European economy being sh*t because of the sanctions on Russia, this is just another big lie propagated by Putin’s propaganda. Europe’s economy has been stagnant since 2008, because of the very high bureocracy, high taxation, bad demographics, big governments as a percentage of the economy (bad resource allocation) and high debt burden. Europe’s economic problems are old and have nothing to do with the sanctions against Russia.

You don't give a sh*t you live in Panama, so why should you care.

And I can say the same about you. You don’t give a sh*t because you live in Switzerland, and are far from Ukraine. I am Romanian, and my country borders Ukraine, so I care a lot more than you do about this conflict. I don’t want my country to be neighbors with Russia. I want Ukraine and Moldova to join the EU and NATO and act as a buffer between my country and Russia. The fact that I live in another country doesn’t mean that I don’t go home often, and I still have family and friends at home, so of course I care about what happens in Europe.

But Europe needs to look for its OWN INTERESTS in order to have the best economy and standard and life, just like the USA is looking for its OWN INTERESTS even if they keep throwing tarrifs and stuff on friendly countries, in the end they are looking for their OWN interests, Europe should learn from that and maybe start doing the same.

This is the only part where I agree with you. Europe should look for its own interests, and make sure Russia is crushed, so it can no longer pose a threat to Europe. Right now, Europe needs to push for more military spending and a stronger military, to deter its enemies and to defeat Russia.

Ukraine is helping us fight Russia without sending our own men to die, so we should be very grateful to them and help them more. Those Europeans who don’t want to help Ukraine are either misinformed or are just traitors. You choose which of the two categories you belong to.
 

contricusc

Contributor
Messages
694
Reactions
11 1,008
Nation of residence
Panama
Nation of origin
Romania
WW3 will never happen.

What a great military strategy, to hope that war will never happen. And what if it happens? You want Europe to be caught with its pants down?

Also Europe will already increase its military spending by ALOT, wasting even more money that could be used for economy, healthcare, infastructure etc... regardless of Ukraine.

Wasting? So having a powerful military is wasting money? You do seem to be a traitor, since you want Europe to be weak and powerless, so that every big power can bully us. Look at the state of the world. The US is threatening with annexing Greenland from a European country, Russia is waging war against Ukraine and it is constantly threatening the Baltic states, which are part of NATO and the EU. Trump is saying that if Europe doesn’t spend more on its military, the US will not help it in case of war. And you want Europe to spend less on military?

Europe needs to get its sh*t together, and make a common EU military. It needs to boost its domestic MIC and stop relying on the US, which is an ally today, but it can become an enemy tomorrow. Look at how Trump is threatening a trade war with Europe. A trade war is basically economic war. You can’t rely for your defence on a country that is willing to wage economic war on you. It is insanity.

Ukraine has nothing to do with me, nothing to do with my country and nothing to do with any of the EU countries, those are just facts.

Nothing to do with you and your country, yes. But it has a lot to do with the Eastern EU countries, and it will be a future member of the EU, so of course it matters a lot.

EVERYONE, most improtantly Europe, USA... everyone.. even Ukraine and Russia, is to END THE WAR, not push TONS and TONS of weapons into the war and make it last another 5 years.
And there will be no winners in this war, both Ukraine and Russia will need to give up alot, but thats how it is.

You continue to regurgitate Putin’s propaganda insinuating that what keeps the war going is Europe and the US helping Ukraine, and that it would somehow be peace if the West just stopped helping. There is only one way to achieve peace, and that is to defeat Russia. As long as Russia can gain ground, it will continue the war. If we stop helping Ukraine, Russia will continue the war and won’t accept any peace proposal. They would continue to steal territory, and they will NEVER stop unless defeated on the battlefield.

If they conquer the entire of Ukraine, they will just open another front elsewhere, maybe in Kazakhstan, or maybe in the Baltics or Moldova. They are a dying empire with a war economy that cannot return to a normal peacetime economy. They have to fight until they lose. So the sooner they lose, the sooner we will have peace. Delaying help for Ukraine only prolongs the war.
 

contricusc

Contributor
Messages
694
Reactions
11 1,008
Nation of residence
Panama
Nation of origin
Romania
However, Switzerland is not a weak country militarily. It’s geography is its best ally and feature against any potential invader.

Yes, Switzerland would not be easy to invade because of its geography, but let’s be realistic, they would not stand a chance against any of its big neighbors like France, Italy or Germany.

But this is of course meaningless, because they have no enemies, and won’t be at war with anyone. They are a landlocked country inside the EU. If for some reason the EU would wish to harm them, they would just blockade them economically and their economy would be destroyed, and they would capitulate.

Don‘t underestimate them. They don’t need EU or anybody to defend them.

Defend them from whom? They are surrounded by the EU. Of course they don’t need the EU to defend them if they are already surrounded by the EU. Their only possible enemy would be the EU itself, but this will never happen as they are in very good relations with the EU, basically implementing everything the EU wants.

And they will not attack any country. But that doesn’t mean they will not defend themselves.

They don’t need to defend themselves because nobody is attacking them. Maybe this is why our Swiss friend is so deluded about military matters and thinks WW3 cannot happen. Living in a country that is lucky to have such civilized and friendly neighbors can make you take peace for granted.
 

FiReFTW

Committed member
Messages
173
Reactions
2 175
Nation of residence
Switzerland
Nation of origin
Switzerland
Yes, Switzerland is part of Western Europe and it is very wealthy and beautiful, but aside from that, it has no strategic importance, as it is a landlocked neutral country. You didn’t join the EU despite being in the heart of Europe, so why should anyone prioritize your military needs when you are neutral, not part of NATO and not part of the EU?
You are not very well educated therefore you are speaking absolute nonsense.

1.Switzerland did apply for EU membership, but later it was withdrawn since on a referendum it was voted by the people against EU membership (By a narrow margin just so you stop speaking nonsense again), the UK is also not in the EU anymore after brexit which was also by a narrow margin, does that make them not important strategically and to Europe? What a bounch of cr*p.
Switzerland also despite not being an EU member is closely tied with the EU by many bilateral agrements and is almost like an EU member despite not being officialy in EU.
2.Switzerland does not join NATO because of its long term standing on neutrality and not participating in wars, and yet Switzerland cooperates with NATO in alot of peacekeeping operations and security operations so again it has very close ties with NATO.

You seriously have no clue about the things you speak


First of all, the foreign country you are talking about is a future EU country, so it is natural for Europe to care about it and help it overcome its problems. When it will join the EU, it will not be a foreign country anymore, but an EU member state, so more integrated than Switzerland.

As for European economy being sh*t because of the sanctions on Russia, this is just another big lie propagated by Putin’s propaganda. Europe’s economy has been stagnant since 2008, because of the very high bureocracy, high taxation, bad demographics, big governments as a percentage of the economy (bad resource allocation) and high debt burden. Europe’s economic problems are old and have nothing to do with the sanctions against Russia.
Its not an EU country as of this moment is it? So whether it will or not be is just speculation and has no bearing on the current reality. Ukraine has nothing to do with the EU and NATO as of this moment, no matter what you write or what potential future you are talking about here.

And yes, at least something you wrote has some truth to it, European economy has a wide range of problems and many of the problems you listed ar indeed responsible for that, however before the Ukranian war the European economy was in a much better shape and those are just facts and the reality of the situation, European economy was hit quite hard since the war, its only natural, denying it is ignorance.


And I can say the same about you. You don’t give a sh*t because you live in Switzerland, and are far from Ukraine. I am Romanian, and my country borders Ukraine, so I care a lot more than you do about this conflict. I don’t want my country to be neighbors with Russia. I want Ukraine and Moldova to join the EU and NATO and act as a buffer between my country and Russia. The fact that I live in another country doesn’t mean that I don’t go home often, and I still have family and friends at home, so of course I care about what happens in Europe.
Actually due to my job im abroad a lot and have stayed in a fair amount of EU countries for quite long times, and im not talking about weeks or 1-2 months here. So EU is extremely important for me on a very personal level, so I have alot to do with how the EU is and its economy, but nice try.
And while your little reasoning for your care about Ukraine since you are from Romania, go there alot, have family and friends there etc... has some validity, its negated by the fact that Romania is a member of the EU and NATO, so its completely safe from Russia.
Everybody with some common sense know that Russia simply will never attack a NATO country because it would get completely wiped out in a week and have no military left, any other reasoning and logic simply does not exist here, it is simply IMPOSSIBLE to ever happen, no matter how some people here try to paint it.


This is the only part where I agree with you. Europe should look for its own interests, and make sure Russia is crushed, so it can no longer pose a threat to Europe. Right now, Europe needs to push for more military spending and a stronger military, to deter its enemies and to defeat Russia.

Ukraine is helping us fight Russia without sending our own men to die, so we should be very grateful to them and help them more. Those Europeans who don’t want to help Ukraine are either misinformed or are just traitors. You choose which of the two categories you belong to.
Throwing labels on someone is not a very intelligent way to talk, but whatever you wish to do, I don't really care, you are just wrong period.
Russia will nevr be "crushed" or "destroyed" its just wishful thinking, Europe will need to find a way to coexist with Russia, those are just facts, anything else is delusion and ignorance.

What a great military strategy, to hope that war will never happen. And what if it happens? You want Europe to be caught with its pants down?


Wasting? So having a powerful military is wasting money? You do seem to be a traitor, since you want Europe to be weak and powerless, so that every big power can bully us. Look at the state of the world. The US is threatening with annexing Greenland from a European country, Russia is waging war against Ukraine and it is constantly threatening the Baltic states, which are part of NATO and the EU. Trump is saying that if Europe doesn’t spend more on its military, the US will not help it in case of war. And you want Europe to spend less on military?

Europe needs to get its sh*t together, and make a common EU military. It needs to boost its domestic MIC and stop relying on the US, which is an ally today, but it can become an enemy tomorrow. Look at how Trump is threatening a trade war with Europe. A trade war is basically economic war. You can’t rely for your defence on a country that is willing to wage economic war on you. It is insanity.
Russia will never attack NATO as stated before, they are not completely insane and they realize they would be completely wiped out.
And Europe having a decent military is not bad, I never said its bad, Europe already has a very strong military now, those are facts. But it is lacking in some areas thats true, should it improve them? Improve their military? Get stronger and more powerful? Sure... it makes sense, but throwing out 5% of GDP is just insane and absolutely st*pid in so many levels. You do realize that only a portion of the GDP is actually used and available for things like infastructure, medicine etc etc... so that 5% figure is actually more like 20-30% in terms of budget. its completely insane, Europe has many other priorities at the moment to improve to make it better for the people. 2.5-3% would be MORE THAN ENOUGH to ensure a very powerful military.

And Trump is insane, and will be out of the white house soon enough, he is absolutely crazy on every level and once he is gone things will be back to normal, the US was always a strong ally of Europe and we have ties that are impossible to sever.


You continue to regurgitate Putin’s propaganda insinuating that what keeps the war going is Europe and the US helping Ukraine, and that it would somehow be peace if the West just stopped helping. There is only one way to achieve peace, and that is to defeat Russia. As long as Russia can gain ground, it will continue the war. If we stop helping Ukraine, Russia will continue the war and won’t accept any peace proposal. They would continue to steal territory, and they will NEVER stop unless defeated on the battlefield.

If they conquer the entire of Ukraine, they will just open another front elsewhere, maybe in Kazakhstan, or maybe in the Baltics or Moldova. They are a dying empire with a war economy that cannot return to a normal peacetime economy. They have to fight until they lose. So the sooner they lose, the sooner we will have peace. Delaying help for Ukraine only prolongs the war.
This is just delusion upon delusion upon delusion, every war is ended by peace talks and peace terms and this one will be too, the sooner it happens the better, time to sit down and get a peace done, now, sacrifices will have to be made but thats life, but the war needs to end.
 

Soldier30

Experienced member
Russian Armed Forces News Editor
Messages
2,066
Reactions
12 1,149
Nation of residence
Russia
Nation of origin
Russia
Footage of strikes by Russian FPV drones, the Rubicon test center, on Ukrainian diesel locomotives used to transport military cargo. The locomotives were hit by drones near the village of Belozerske near Dobropolye in Donbas. This is approximately 27 km from the front line. The drone models are not reported. As a result of the drone attacks, some Ukrainian trains were derailed, the damaged equipment is shown at the end of the video.

 

Follow us on social media

Latest posts

Top Bottom