Israel doesn't want to be neighbours with the "Islamists" as they are doing everything they can to keep Muslim Brothehood away from power in the Arab countries. They supported the coup against Morsi in Egypt and all the Western/Zionist puppets in the region declared the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization.
Israel doesn't give a shit about Arab dictators lol, especially after the fall of Assad, Ba'athism is long dead, plus it was never built on solid ground. But Israel still preferred to get rid of Assad as he was aligned with Iran and Russia, and ultimately the new Syrian leader is US puppet, I'm tired of people suggesting otherwise.
If tomorrow Egypt, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and other Arab nations truly worked together and were a threat, suddenly you'd see Islamist uprisings in all these countries.
The fact is that Arab nations are utterly incompetent, they don't pose a real threat. It doesn't necessarily matter if they're Islamist or not. Sisi is preferred as he plays well with the US/Israel and thus allows for western controlled trade through the Suez Canal.
Iran and Türkiye on the other hand are two major non-Arab states that completely threaten the order set up in the middle east.
Arab nationalism means nothing, thus can't pose a real threat. Persian and Turkish nationalism poses a real threat. They're two unique cultures sitting on the edge of the middle east that can exert pressure across the whole region.
Iran was handicapped by a US sponsored coup that put a complete buffoon in power. Then the UK and France gave Khammeni full support.
"France's Role
Safe Haven: In October 1978, Khomeini relocated to the Paris suburb of Neauphle-le-Château. Because Iranians did not require visas to enter France at the time, and because France offered freedom of expression, he was provided a neutral, international platform from which to broadcast his message. [1, 2, 3]Media and Communication: The French telephone and media infrastructure allowed Khomeini to easily call contacts in Iran and record speeches on cassette tapes, which were then copied and distributed across the country. [1, 2]Intellectual Support: Many left-wing French intellectuals and media initially hailed Khomeini as a revolutionary liberator. [1, 2]
The UK's Role
Intelligence and Strategy: British and American intelligence services lost faith in the Shah to protect Western interests. The UK supported diplomatic efforts to transition power away from the Shah and quietly accommodated the rising theocratic movement. [1, 2, 3]Post-Revolution Alignment: Declassified files have shown that in the early 1980s, British intelligence (MI6) even provided Khomeini's regime with lists of suspected Soviet agents in Iran. This information was used by the new Islamic government to eliminate left-wing political rivals, a move the UK tolerated in hopes of currying favor with the new regime. [1]"
The western support for Islamists is clear as day and the 2 biggest targets all along have been Iran and Türkiye. Sick and tired of people pretending otherwise.
