TR Foreign Policy & Geopolitics

[mehmed beg]

It is surprising how people are rigid in their positions. Mostly it is always in deductive manner.
" I believe this and that and I will use facts or conjectures to prove that this and that are bad or good"
As far as Palestinian resistance goes, a long ago extreme left like Georges Habash , Abu Nidal , Carlos and even socialist Lebanese Waleed Jumblat were truly opponents of Israel. There wasn't much of Islamic resistance
Although, they were sincere in their fight that were under influence from kind of people like Chomsky, for example. Chomsky has a protege like Edward Said, no?
I have always known what kind of scum and gatekeeper,Chomsky and his ilk are. Hence in the course of time, the old guard died out and people like Palestinian Authority or Dahlan came about.
Whether Hamas had connection to Israel is besides the point. Now , definitely they are not. I understand that they are very stupid and I wrote some time ago that if it is in my powers I would Court martial them.
I also believe that the real Islamist died out with the Ottoman Empire, hence I am not secularist but I am not Islamist either.
To be Islamist with whom exactly?
Weather this report which Lool put up here is genuine or not per ce , is immaterial. I guess that we all know by now what they think. And knowing the Jewery well, no one likes to brag like they do. So I will talk this proffers words as true, weather he said it or not. Because over the years, Jews said the same thing over and over again.

 

[mehmed beg]

I believe whatever system Turkiye uses it won't be to anyone's pleasure . The meat existence of it all , bothers them for the various reasons.
Ottoman Empire was successor of the Roman Empire and it ruled in similar ways. What allegedly, " Them" want is recreation of the fakery of that Idea. They don't have decency nor intellect to rule like the Sublime State did .
Hell, they are not even able to take a lesson from Atatürk, as one Englishman said " Unfortunately, we didn't take the lesson from Atatürk, which is how to exist without the Empire".
Yes , Jews are creating psychosis among many and it is not just the Jewery.
I have noticed a long ago that many people are hiding behind " Nationalism" or " Atatürk idea" . Simple to see , really. Sometimes they say such things that Enver Pasha or Fevzi Pasha would hang them and someone can't be bigger nationalist then them.
Those people are going to the same direction like Iranian opposition.
As you can see , Iranian opposition is so dumb and nasty that they can't see that the Mullahs are biggest Iranian Nationalists.
Particularly, the stupid sort of nostalgia is always used for the purpose of undermining the structure. It starts from that then it becomes something more sinister. I have seen it all in Bosnia, unfortunately I really have.
So , try to find something in common with your opposition, wether Islamist or Secularist , as long as it is beneficial.
Some arguments will always remain but the state must be protected. Some consensus of the willing must be found.
As anecdote, my close friend, studied in Turkey and then in Colombia university. It was in 90s
He is secularist true and true. He has a lot of connections in USA and elsewhere. His phone book consists of the names that all of you here heard, even Olmert etc.
But, he is great patriot and he does always what is in interest of Turkiye and Bosnia. I absolutely love the guy. I know he skipped the war ( a bit young) , he has totally opposing views to mine. I wouldn't be surprised if he is a Mason but he is one of at the end of the day. Yes , even such person , prefers Erdogan to CHP.
So , forget the decoys that Jews left in Turkiye and elsewhere, coocoo egg.
If you carry on , you will be always 30 years behind.

 

[Mis_TR_Like]

Israel doesn't want to be neighbours with the "Islamists" as they are doing everything they can to keep Muslim Brothehood away from power in the Arab countries. They supported the coup against Morsi in Egypt and all the Western/Zionist puppets in the region declared the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization.

Israel doesn't give a shit about Arab dictators lol, especially after the fall of Assad, Ba'athism is long dead, plus it was never built on solid ground. But Israel still preferred to get rid of Assad as he was aligned with Iran and Russia, and ultimately the new Syrian leader is US puppet, I'm tired of people suggesting otherwise.

If tomorrow Egypt, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and other Arab nations truly worked together and were a threat, suddenly you'd see Islamist uprisings in all these countries.

The fact is that Arab nations are utterly incompetent, they don't pose a real threat. It doesn't necessarily matter if they're Islamist or not. Sisi is preferred as he plays well with the US/Israel and thus allows for western controlled trade through the Suez Canal.

Iran and Türkiye on the other hand are two major non-Arab states that completely threaten the order set up in the middle east.

Arab nationalism means nothing, thus can't pose a real threat. Persian and Turkish nationalism poses a real threat. They're two unique cultures sitting on the edge of the middle east that can exert pressure across the whole region.

Iran was handicapped by a US sponsored coup that put a complete buffoon in power. Then the UK and France gave Khammeni full support.

"France's Role

Safe Haven: In October 1978, Khomeini relocated to the Paris suburb of Neauphle-le-Château. Because Iranians did not require visas to enter France at the time, and because France offered freedom of expression, he was provided a neutral, international platform from which to broadcast his message. [1, 2, 3]Media and Communication: The French telephone and media infrastructure allowed Khomeini to easily call contacts in Iran and record speeches on cassette tapes, which were then copied and distributed across the country. [1, 2]Intellectual Support: Many left-wing French intellectuals and media initially hailed Khomeini as a revolutionary liberator. [1, 2]

The UK's Role

Intelligence and Strategy: British and American intelligence services lost faith in the Shah to protect Western interests. The UK supported diplomatic efforts to transition power away from the Shah and quietly accommodated the rising theocratic movement. [1, 2, 3]Post-Revolution Alignment: Declassified files have shown that in the early 1980s, British intelligence (MI6) even provided Khomeini's regime with lists of suspected Soviet agents in Iran. This information was used by the new Islamic government to eliminate left-wing political rivals, a move the UK tolerated in hopes of currying favor with the new regime. [1]"





The western support for Islamists is clear as day and the 2 biggest targets all along have been Iran and Türkiye. Sick and tired of people pretending otherwise.