Yah Turkey must hold certain things close as possible to its chest for time being...given its still part of NATO tech chain...and is in transition in lot of key things simultaneously (and at different stages) to indigenise and absorb+augment with its own RnD capability.
Pakistan recently put in request for German AIP tech, Merkel told them a curt no...because it was clearly a shoe-in for it to circuit to the chinese.
Turkey also has to think long term past Erdogan politics too. A country has to come first and be very pragmatic and secure in its direction and plan.
Pakistan also needs to figure its stuff out.
This country has a weird habit of falling over its heels for literally any one extending a branch.
It's ironic because their own policy playbook (written in the 1960s) clearly argues that alliances are all capricious by nature. Yet be it USA, China, KSA, or Turkey, their leaders consistently break those clearly written -- and well thought-out -- concepts.
If anything, Pakistan should force a hard-break from both the US and China. It has a good geo-political position, so it can sustain a general posture of neutrality and non-interference. I'm not talking about the meek "see no evil, hear no evil, etc" type we see today, but a genuine, "we have principles -- we'll stick to them" kind of approach. It's totally lacking, and it's no surprise that everyone from Germany to Turkey sees it.
Let's not forget the schizophrenic approach Islamabad takes on Muslims. It cries and sings about Kashmir (literally), yet it's totally silent on the Uighers in China. The best was in Syria. It shamelessly backed Assad, yet that guy affirmed India's stance on Kashmir.
If Pakistan had a true neutral/self-interested posture, it wouldn't have trouble securing Western tech for its requirements (well, India might cause issues still, but at least China wouldn't be a factor). This country has zero national character or spine.
To be frank, Pakistan would get German AIP tech if it openly warns China about the Uigher situation. If you have enough steel in your scrotum to that, then you can be trusted with sensitive tech (and might need it Lol).
Yet, it shouldn't be hard carving an identity -- e.g., "We sit at the cross-roads of 3 great regions. We guard the prosperity South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East by supporting stability in our neighbours, and we maintain parity with our peers."
Anyways. I did have an on-topic question.
So, I know Turkey is trying to develop a turbofan for the TFX via TR Motor. Fair. But what about the Hurjet? Isn't there an opportunity (or need) here to develop an ITAR-free 92-97 kN design for a true, exportable lightweight fighter? If Pakistan was smart, I think it would actually try investing in that kind of engine (for its own requirements).