My mom had the opportunity to buy a single family house at the black sea coast for 20k lira back in 2000...Did apartments jumped from 350k to 2 millions lira for example in Turkey, i really doubt that it is.
Latest Thread
My mom had the opportunity to buy a single family house at the black sea coast for 20k lira back in 2000...Did apartments jumped from 350k to 2 millions lira for example in Turkey, i really doubt that it is.
Ok, now just to find rates of swedish kruna and turkish lira towards usd at the time and today.My mom had the opportunity to buy a single family house at the black sea coast for 20k lira back in 2000...
Why does that matter? Real estate got expensive in Turkey before the devaluation/inflation, ask any Turk here and stop arguing about stuff that you dont know.Ok, now just to find rates of swedish kruna and turkish lira towards usd at the time and today.
It matters because of putting values in proper frames. I asked simple question.Why does that matter? Real estate got expensive in Turkey before the devaluation/inflation, ask any Turk here and stop arguing about stuff that you dont know.
It matters because of putting values in proper frames. I asked simple question.
Real estate prices increased globally in the last two decades.
By the way, you can make a triplex villa in Turkey with 2.5 million TL. But for a 300 square meter apartment in Berlin, you need to spend 8 million euros.The number of new apartments built in the country last year rose 2 per cent to 293,000 — but that remained below the 400,000 a year needed to meet demand. Eyebrows were raised in Munich by last month’s €8m sale of a 300 sq m apartment, which set a new record for the city. The share prices of German property developers Deutsche Wohnen and Vonovia both recently hit new 12-year highs.
Is there an increase in the housing market globally? Yes there is absolutely. Even if someone ignores it. Even if someone thinks house prices are only going up in Turkey.
Is there an increase in the housing market globally? Yes there is absolutely. Even if someone ignores it. Even if someone thinks house prices are only going up in Turkey.
Apart from the example I gave from Berlin, I just summarized the general situation of the real estate market around the world. In this way, we now have real data.It needs comparison of the relative rates (between the countries in question w.r.t world "average" since say 2% is very different to say 10% increase) and across different periods (5, 10 , 20 year blocks) to know what is structural versus transient.....and also what is general base inflation driven versus what is extra/impulse-demand driven (due to demand/supply constrictions in other parts of economy).
If someone has a typical property price for Turkey each year since say 2000 or some reference year, we can see this effect if we have the same for a country of comparison....holding context things as equivalent as possible.
Apart from the example I gave from Berlin, I just summarized the general situation of the real estate market around the world. In this way, we now have real data.
Here we do not compare values that are very close to each other. So I don't see the need to make such a detailed comparison. Because the difference is very crazy. Even in Germany, I do not believe that a villa outside the city is likely to be cheap from Turkey.It needs apples-apples. Is the triplex villa being quoted (for Turkey) in the same location as the 300 sq apartment in Berlin?
If we use city centre, it needs city centre for the other. Suburb for suburb....and rural for rural etc.
So more data we have on those, the better. There is maybe a real estate "basket" price index too that people can find (it is not my area of expertise, so I dont know)
Then you have to take into account the preset price levels (since we are talking about increases i.e inflation vs demand)....given these are higher in more developed countries as their assets/resources are closer to relative saturation.
You explained it well, i was wrong but not completely there are some nuances, tought that discrepance is lessXenon is correct.
But let us see:
USD per SEK = 0.1 in 2000 and 0.12 today. (i.e 8 or 9 Krona per USD both times)
i.e SEK inflated at pretty much same rate as USD has over this period.
Turkish (Old) Lira per USD in 2000 = 620,000 = 0.62 New Lira
New Lira today is 8.5.
Effectively Lira has inflated nearly 14 times w.r.t USD in the time period (2000 - 2020).
You acquire and hold a hard asset, its basically par for the course (by doing nothing) if its now 14 times its value in Lira than it was in 2000....when comparing to global average (USD reference).
i.e you have to get say 20+ times its value today for the investment to have been worth it (especially relative to other investments that give say a percentage return past the inflation compounded - given latter is of no real value) given the base rate relative inflation.
Whereas this ratio is close to 1 in Sweden w.r.t same global USD reference.
So I am not sure what is the point you are getting at?
I am working at a property management company in DK registered in Sweden stock exchange, and even here in Denmark can see the unsustainable prizes in Sweden. Having so much land to build on must be nice, but recycling and reusing old buildings in new ways is more sustainable. IMO.It is the same everywhere, that is why central banks have official inflation targets which results in citizens always get fucked.
Here in Sweden, the inflation target is 2% but house prices increased +20% this year alone. You may think this is unusual year due to corona but house prices have increased with 10-20% every year since more than 20 years while salaries have been near stagnant for the last 40 years with 0-1.5% annual increase, i.e. even under the official inflation and far under the real inflation.
Some examples, my first apartment costed me 350 000kr in 2001 and the exact same apartment now 20 year later cost >2 000 000kr. Pizza were 29kr in 2001 and 95kr in 2021 in the exact same pizzeria with 20 year older interior. Entry level salary were 18000kr back in 2001 and is now 23000kr.
It needs apples-apples. Is the triplex villa being quoted (for Turkey) in the same location as the 300 sq apartment in Berlin?
If we use city centre, it needs city centre for the other. Suburb for suburb....and rural for rural etc.
So more data we have on those, the better. There is maybe a real estate "basket" price index too that people can find (it is not my area of expertise, so I dont know)
Then you have to take into account the preset price levels (since we are talking about increases i.e inflation vs demand)....given these are higher in more developed countries as their assets/resources are closer to relative saturation.
Here we do not compare values that are very close to each other. So I don't see the need to make such a detailed comparison. Because the difference is very crazy. Even in Germany, I do not believe that a villa outside the city is likely to be cheap from Turkey.
So it did thanks to negative prime rate (-0.5%) for about 10 years in Sweden. The current national prime rate is still 0% since 1-2 years. Most well off countries had also very low or even negative prime rate so all of them had increased estate prices.Real estate prices increased globally in the last two decades.
Sweden doesn't have Danish Realkredit institutes. You have only banks like rest of the world. And banks are masters of laundering money and sucking the bonemarrow out of you.So it did thanks to negative prime rate (-0.5%) for about 10 years in Sweden. The current national prime rate is still 0% since 1-2 years. Most well off countries had also very low or even negative prime rate so all of them had increased estate prices.
This resulted in that even for a well-educated engineers like me, it would take +50 years if I payed 100% of my salary to pay the mortgage loan on the average price of a decent detached house (0.9-1M€ for 170m2) in a mid-range region of Stockholm. If I decided to only pay 50% of my current salary for the mortgage then the loan would literally never decrease since the interest would be higher then the mortgage.
The system has changed significantly since the 70s where the average blue collar worker actually could own his house debt-free after 25 years with reasonable mortgage rates. The current system is designed to have 99% of the population to be in debt forever while ever increasing part of your salary goes to the bank. The government don't count this increased living cost as inflation.
that is like islamic banking in principal, interest rates based economy will destroy everything eventually. i did not now that, one more proof thad danish people are quite smart and responsible towards their population.Sweden doesn't have Danish Realkredit institutes. You have only banks like rest of the world. And banks are masters of laundering money and sucking the bonemarrow out of you.
Realkredit is mortgage system, but the rules governing Realkredit are rock solid, and doesn't permit "banking" governance, which is why it's difficult to evaluate it (Bank ppl outside Denmark don't get it). You can get a loan of 2 mio. dkk to fixed value of, let's say 98,9 (100 would mean you borrow 2 mio. and pay 2 mio, + some administration fee at the end) you end up paying in total aprox. 2,2 mio. dkk over 30 years.
Pretty cheap right. Though you can only finance up to 80% of the property, and have to finance the remaining 20% either by bank loan or save up in cash.
Realkredit in Denmark is barely 1%, it was 6-7% when the financial crises occurred. Has been going down ever since because the entire world wants to invest in Denmark.
This system is not possible for Turkey because all necessary institutions to regulate, balance and protect it is not in place. Also the Central Bank is very important in this case. Especially the head, and since RTE seems fond of forcing his vision on everyone, no trust in the CB.that is like islamic banking in principal, interest rates based economy will destroy everything eventually. i did not now that, one more proof thad danish people are quite smart and responsible towards their population.