TR Naval Programs

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,502
Solutions
2
Reactions
118 24,884
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
The ones outside SEDEF ? One seems to be in a drydock two are anchored.
tuzlav2.jpg
 

Siper>MMU

Contributor
Messages
542
Reactions
2 1,191
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
There was a hole on TCG İstanbul for 76MM gun. From latest satellite image it seems that hole is closed. There was some rumors about planning to increase VLS cells from 16 to 32.
1623832393724.png

1623832517928.png
 

Spook

Contributor
Messages
607
Reactions
2,106
Nation of residence
Albania
Nation of origin
Turkey
How will Navy respond to peacetime asymmetrical threats? Like UAS, USV and manned threats. I am talking about threats that can occur when ships is defense systems are partly inactive like during port visit or near shore. Ship personnel should receive training with man-portable C-UAS systems like IHASAVAR. If the port doesn't have C-UAS measures. Navy could also station something portable like IHTAR on shore aside from ships C-UAS capabilities. For sea threats, if ULAQ or small USVs can be carried inside the ship it can be launched anywhere to provide area defense. 25-30mm SMASH should be evaluated for not just sea threats but also for capability against small UAS threats. Rafael's Typhoon Mk30c did show C-UAS capability with air-burst ammo. Both STAMP and Typhoon use Bushmaster Mk44 cannon.

Manned threats also include submerged like diver and semi-submerged threats etc. Portable diver detection sonars are very important.
 
Last edited:

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,502
Solutions
2
Reactions
118 24,884
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Would be a welcome change but I don't think there is any room for that.

@Anmdt would know better.
It is better to wait and see instead of earing some rumors from youtube :). As of now it it is still 16.

How will Navy respond to peacetime asymmetrical threats? Like UAS, USV and manned threats. I am talking about threats that can occur when ships is defense systems are partly inactive like during port visit or near shore. Ship personnel should receive training with man-portable C-UAS systems like IHASAVAR. If the port doesn't have C-UAS measures. Navy could also station something portable like IHTAR on shore aside from ships C-UAS capabilities. For sea threats, if ULAQ or small USVs can be carried inside the ship it can be launched anywhere to provide area defense. 25-30mm SMASH should be evaluated for not just sea threats but also for capability against small UAS threats. Rafael's Typhoon Mk30c did show C-UAS capability with air-burst ammo. Both STAMP and Typhoon use Bushmaster Mk44 cannon.

Manned threats also include submerged like diver and submarine or semi-submerged threats etc. Portable diver detection sonars are very important.
Ports and bases being equipped with some systems, specifically diver and incursion detection systems. Aselsan was working on some:



For UAS protection, Navy will morelikely adopt some of the available solutions in near future and customize some of them for aerial anti-symmetrical threats.
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,502
Solutions
2
Reactions
118 24,884
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

Test7

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
4,785
Reactions
19 19,937
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Turkey
I can listen to the @Kozan S. ERKAN 's speech all day. Zero ego, zero arrogance... He doesn't try to look like a very very important person by using fancy and complex sentences. I'm looking forward to watching the broadcast 🍿
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,247
Reactions
141 16,269
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
ESSM Block 2 integration to MDAS is a question. Even were allowed to be integrated to MDAS. Quadpacking wouldn't be allowed.
Actually, no foreign made missiles will be suitable for MDAS.
Only home made missiles will be usable. Our own missiles too, will not be suitable on MK41 VLS systems. That is the way it will be now.
 

Spook

Contributor
Messages
607
Reactions
2,106
Nation of residence
Albania
Nation of origin
Turkey
Actually, no foreign made missiles will be suitable for MDAS.
Only home made missiles will be usable. Our own missiles too, will not be suitable on MK41 VLS systems. That is the way it will be now.

They mentioned as an interim solution until Hisar based solution matured. We can develop ESSM Block 1 and SM-1 alternative. Something like ESSM Block 2 will take time.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom