This simply isn't true. There have been multiple cases of human rights violations. Anywhere in the world if you put an Army in charge of a hostile civilian population, there will be violations. Now with social media and proliferation of cameras, this has come down. But speak to local Kashmiris and they will tell you how bad things were in the 1990s to 2000s.Sir,
I must add One thing...
Pakistan and their sense of history is in "echo chamber". your claims are not even worth few bytes of storage on this forum.
People in Kashmir are way more prosperous than their Pakistani counterparts. As for partition goes, It was on religious lines but princely states were independent to join Us or Pakistan. seems like Pak;s history booked too are corrupt.... it;s well documented everywhere.
and Rape threat et all... that was making of your Pakistan sponsored terrorists . Indian Army is a professional army unlike rogue PAK army who even refused to ack their Own in kargil !!!!!!!!!!
and rather than putting gory videos of people's suffering,... this is what real POK residents feel about india
An Army should be in barracks. Worst case, they should quell a disturbance in a few days and return.