Search results

it would be too heavy... its heavy already with 16 cell strike lentgh midlas..Siper2, Gezgin and Hisar-D with quadpacked is heavy missiles

234mm diameter also IDEF2025 Roketsan numbers..i think brochure number wrong not first time... 185mm is most likely IIR guided section's diameter..

No...Hisar RF's diameter 234mm and length 4.5m. I read somewhere say dual trust useless because of missile already high speed your low trust sustain engine doesnt change too much... Thats why change Aim-120b dual trust to Aim-120c all boost engine...Maybe this work only for high altidude BVR...

Hisar-D is not bulky, slimmer than ESSM Hisar-D's diameter 234mm...ESSM's 254mm Hisar D just need folding fins

We dont know KAAN's gross weight... wet trust/gross weight rate is 0.8 for F-22, 0.7 for EF if KAAN's gross weight is 60.000lb....24.000lbf (0.8) or 21.000lbf (0.7) will be enough We know KAAN's supercruise requirement lower than F-22..

Why would they do that...35.000lbf is enough for KAAN More power...you sacrificed to engine's life and maintainence cost

Its looks like shorter than Tomahawk and MdCN...~5 meter....Because of also air launched? Even Siper B2 way bigger than this With inefficient turbojet engine its range shorter than we expect

More speed...and it can sustain this all the time

No...They have gas turbine.

No, on the contrary, Istanbul receives very very little public investment...Anyone who has traveled to Anatolia must know this by now İstanbul needs more infrastructure investment especially for highways and Bosphorus crossing

No... we need at least one gun system CIWS Even TF2000 have both gun and missile ciws...

Thats not pruduction or exports..just re-exports Netherlands is port country like bigger Hong Kong and Singapore.

There is no SOM-ER..its (air)- gezgin 1.2 tonnes, 450kg warhead, turbojet engine...this means 500-600km range, you dont need source for this if we have turbofan, range would up to 1000km

if F-14, Su-33, J-15 can...why not KAAN can carrier fighter We need CATOBAR and Kaan Naval

F-16's under fuselage capacity way way lower than under wings

You cant see who replied am i? Without continuous flow of order..what do you expect? Thats why its important for pruducer country's orders to spread over the years

No Haven't learn anything...there was no domestic engine yet, we will most likely see fully functional KAAN by 2037-40 Even if we don't count these...You cannot produce 240 aircraft in 10 years and close the line after that Production and orders have to be spread over years Look even after...

We are not post-cold war peace anymore...World became more dangerous countries ramp up military proucements Bandirma-Balikesir-Eskisehir-Konya-Merzifon-Diyarbakir-Malatya-İncirlik-Dalaman....We have 9 AJÜ, we need 360 manned fighter jet And i think we should open again Murted B30's...

i'm talking about LANDING runway...angled one its very important for aircraft capacity MUGEM vs Kitty Hawk

MUGEM should have EMALS MUGEM bigger than it seems...Landing runway length almost similar as US supercarriers...Maybe it can operate KAAN like big birds with EMALS Until we can have carrier with EMALS..We should buy F-35B for our LHDs