I am not emotional. Let me explain: Political parties are established without prior authorization but carry out their activities within the provisions of the Constitution and the law. Constitutional Court shall have jurisdiction over the compliance of their activities with the provisions of the Constitution and the law. The financial audit of political parties shall also be carried out by the Constitutional Court.
If the founders of a new party are in good standing and the party's statute is not unconstitutional, it may freely participate in elections. If the party does not use the resources allocated to it in favor of the terrorist organization, as in the case of Batasuna in Spain, as in the case of the Hdp and its previous forms in our country, or if it does not act as a front for money laundering of terrorist organization funds, if the party headquarters does not engage in actions that threaten the constitutional order, does not kidnap people and take them to terrorist camps, does not act as a direct political field officer of the terrorist organization, does not hold an administrative position in terrorist organization-affiliated media organs or front organizations, and does not use his/her personal immovable properties as the organization's house, office or personal vehicles for this purpose: The Constitutional Court cannot prosecute those party leaders simply because of their views.
Hdp should be shut down. If the new green party they have opened exceeds the constitutional limits just like the hdp, it should also be shut down. If we are against shutting down a party that is involved in crimes, saying that this is not the solution, then let's throw the constitution completely in the trash and give full autonomy to the PKK in the east of the country, the easiest solution. This way there would be no justification for the PKK's armed terrorism, and we would stop waiting for Hdp to deny its ties with the PKK. The issue would be closed.
Or, my suggestion, you give Demirtaş and other PKK spokespersons no hope and tell them that these constitutional crimes will be held to account without hesitation. You start putting a stop to the slightest offense related to terrorism, starting from the level of political parties, without worrying about which European institution will say what. In this way, you create only one option for Hdp voters, you force them to stay within constitutional boundaries, since they cannot act in the legal field with a political strategy similar to the hdp, a pkk apparatus. In this country, a political party can express its ideas, which can be quite contradictory, with a breadth that can be seen in very few countries in the world. But to ignore the constitution and the survival of the country when its actions have organic ties with a terrorist organization shows that it is a client state that fears threats from the West.
At this point, I condemn both parts of the alliances for their ambivalent attitude, without distinguishing between party A or party B. Because they are not clear about this. They tend to engage with this party at every opportunity instead of distancing themselves from it.
www.sozcu.com.tr
www.memurlar.net
www.haberturk.com
