Azerbaijan Armenia Tensions

Ghost soldier

Хижак
Messages
1,389
Reactions
3 3,798
Nation of residence
Morocco
Nation of origin
Moroco
I know you as an Indian secretly support the Armenians. But can you stop posting nonsense propaganda? The Armenians are claiming outrageous things all the time.

The members here are pretty good at presenting a moderate picture of losses on both sides.
There were posts on official losses presented by Armenian side but this tweet is just a claim with no proof
Also please refrain from flaming
 

Agha Sher

Experienced member
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,750
Reactions
11 9,295
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Afghanistan
My personal opinions in this matter are of little relevance as I never bring them up. Propaganda is being done by both sides as folks have mentioned earlier. If you cannot see both sides of the picture then you are effectively blind. Do not divert this topic by bringing in my nationality.

You ARE sharing propaganda when you're quoting a random Armenian tweet without any visual evidence. If you look at her other tweets one would have thought they had captured Baku by now.
 
T

triangle

Guest
So you are basically constructing your assumptions based on the assumption that Armenian numbers are true.

Anyone can say otherwise.

If you bothered to read the rest of my post, you would have gotten your answer. The armenians have provided more graphic evidence to support their claims. Some of them too bloody to share on this site.
 
M

Maximilian Veers

Guest
You ARE sharing propaganda when you're quoting a random Armenian tweet without any visual evidence. If you look at her other tweets one would have thought they had captured Baku by now.

Press secretary of the Minister of Defence of Armenia is NOT a random Armenian tweet. TBH, god only knows how much of the claims on both sides are true. If we are going to post random tweets. Post from both sides, or else have a complete ban on OSINT's. Only post when there are verifying pictures/Audio and official claims of both sides.
 

Agha Sher

Experienced member
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,750
Reactions
11 9,295
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Afghanistan
Press secretary of the Minister of Defence of Armenia is NOT a random Armenian tweet. TBH, god only knows how much of the claims on both sides are true. If we are going to post random tweets. Post from both sides, or else have a complete ban on OSINT's. Only post when there are verifying pictures/Audio and official claims of both sides.

The account is not verified. At this point in time, her account is just a random Armenian twitter. Her content is most of the time not even on par with mediocre OSINT accounts.

We are trying to only share report of destruction when we have visual evidence. These Armenians have only shown proof of 1/20 of what they claim.
 
S

Sinan

Guest
If you bothered to read the rest of my post, you would have gotten your answer. The armenians have provided more graphic evidence to support their claims. Some of them too bloody to share on this site.
Nope, i read the rest and i still think otherwise. I think, Azerbaijan side provided more evidence.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,591
Reactions
35 19,661
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey

Good point in the video. it's Karabagh-Nagarno under militia occupation vs. Azerbaycan. So ppl has to be careful of the terms being used.
 

Deliorman

Contributor
Messages
972
Reactions
8 3,924
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Bulgaria
A question that I have not seen to be asked so far is:

How many troops and what kind of tech are both sides using so far? Why are Azeris not using their Air Force at all?

ps I am sure that both sides are overestimating the loses of the enemy and underestimating theirs for propaganda purposes.
 

Combat-Master

Baklava Consumer
Moderator
Messages
3,667
Reactions
15 25,473
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
atleast ~30 neutralised right there
Q9pU37T.gif
 
T

triangle

Guest
Nope, i read the rest and i still think otherwise. I think, Azerbaijan side provided more evidence.

There are literally scores of martyred Azeri soldiers in the hands of the armenians which have provided graphic evidence for it. Can't say the same of the Azeri's.

The Azeri's have broken their teeth on the artsakhian defenses because of their incompetence. If this ends in a stalemate or God forbid a loss, they should march on Baku and bring down the political and military leadership for this humiliation. They are losing to a semi-independent state-let with a PPP GDP of $713 million.

The armenians themselves haven't even used their armed forces in any meaningful way yet in this conflict. Whatever the Azeri's still have in fighting capability, it will be not much for the armenians to fight against. It is only by the grace of expensive Turkish and Israeli drones that they manage to inflict casualties on the enemy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ghost soldier

Хижак
Messages
1,389
Reactions
3 3,798
Nation of residence
Morocco
Nation of origin
Moroco
A question that I have not seen to be asked so far is:

How many troops and what kind of tech are both sides using so far? Why are Azeris not using their Air Force at all?

ps I am sure that both sides are overestimating the loses of the enemy and underestimating theirs for propaganda purposes.
Azerbaijani air force is made of mig 29 and su 25 therefore it can't use them since they have unguided munition and easy to shot down (ps:su-25 was reportedly used by Armenia and crashed)
Armenia uses Soviet and Russian tech bought from the 90s while Azerbaijan uses Turkish Israeli and some Soviet and Russian weaponry and Azerbaijan has advantage in drones
This may be the reason why Azerbaijan started to suppress enemy air defences with drones so their planes can operate safely
EDIT:I meant Azerbaijan instead of Armenia when I said it uses Turkish Israeli and Russian weaponry
 
Last edited:

Ryder

Experienced member
Messages
10,837
Reactions
6 18,668
Nation of residence
Australia
Nation of origin
Turkey
Brother, you don't think our artillery killed some of their children as well? War is terrible, better to treat the dead with respect at least.

If azerbaijanis kill civilians I would condemn it.

But Azerbaijanis are not deliberately targeting civilians like armenians.

Armenians target civilians deliberately because we are Turks. To them women and children are not even spared. Because every Turk to them needs to die.

Armenian mentality is to wipe out every Turk on the face of the planet and take their lands.

You cant reason with them. They are also treating this conflict as if they are fighting Turkiye itself.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,591
Reactions
35 19,661
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
Azerbaycan needs to succesfully utilize the uav they have and free occupied lands as I imagine that Armenia will be shifting to UAV in case of a ceasefire. It's very effective, and can be replaced easily.

I hope Azerbaycan can give us some really good news very soon.
 

Ryder

Experienced member
Messages
10,837
Reactions
6 18,668
Nation of residence
Australia
Nation of origin
Turkey
Armenians have still not have provided any evidence of Turkish F16s operating.

As usual they got to get another country to intervene to save their asses. So why not invent lies.

F16s are not stealth.
 

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Moderator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
9,738
Reactions
118 19,732
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
A question that I have not seen to be asked so far is:

How many troops and what kind of tech are both sides using so far? Why are Azeris not using their Air Force at all?

ps I am sure that both sides are overestimating the loses of the enemy and underestimating theirs for propaganda purposes.

I feel Azeris have been given a message by cpl countries where some red lines are and thus they have elected to deliberately not escalate.

I was going to type this 2 days ago, but I chose not to because it might have upset some posters...and felt let some more days play out first.

Soldiers and armour thus restricted to make frontal assaults with the requisite available SEAD and DEAD from the drone tech and some directed artillery and mortars etc.

But the absence of AF is very telling...directed heavy aerial assault with PGM is what actually would be gamechanger to make headway into actual strategic capture of territory....given you can actually then spearhead effectively with armour and strike infantry behind it...otherwise you will just expend them for little.

That would be a clear rung up in escalation. The rung above that would be expanding sustained air assault and ballistic assault on crucial infrastructure past the battlezone area...for infrastructure and logistical denial.

None of those 2 happen, means Azeris are not going to make much advance I am afraid, because of defender advantage with Armenians and also terrain advantage favouring them in lot of areas.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom