ECRS-MK1 is actually built on the basic ECRS-MK0. There isn’t much difference between the two. But the MK1 has more developed T/R modules that allows it to be cooler and improve in performance. Electronic Attack facility is there. It allows for more intricate retrofitted EW and SAR capability.Will the Qatari tranche 3a fighters be upgraded to tranche 4 like EF from Oman?
All the Turkish eurofighters should have Captor-E ECRS MK1 radar at least.
Is this stated somewhere officially?So we can use our own developed wepons on the Typhoon which is great. This can open the doors for our ammo sales to other users too.
I read in some webnews that we have software accees and we can use our ammo, selling ammo is my speculation.Is this stated somewhere officially?
Weapon load shown here is the same as what was shown earlier this year. I think we can expect the weapons package to be Meteors, ASRAAM, Paveway kits and Brimstone. And the Sniper. Sniper is now 20 year old tech. Hopefully the first order of business is properly integrating HGK and Aselpod. Always good options to have and should be relatively easier.
The potential other 20 planes would be T5, I guess.
just ignore the guy with the hair....
They have to sell us something, if they don't it forces Turkiye to look to Russia, China etc. From my perspective the NATO side of the story always does the bare minimum for us. Basically just enough to keep us on side but never enough to truly help us with our regional problems.
This is how they are able to play a double game. Support our enemies, support terrorism against us, promote the agenda in their media and internationalise a domestic issue to the detriment of Turkiye.
So basically they do just enough to make sure they get the best outcome concerning Turkiye. As far as were concerned "beggars cannot be choosers". Going towards Russia, China is no good for us, USA, Europe is the lessor devil but its not great either.
So here we are, dumped out the F35 predictably so. Delayed by many years concerning fighter jet procurement and now were buying from the English and you hope if tomorrow you need to act in syria, the east med, cyprus or anywhere really that they don't pull an american on you. And the British are globally known for their games.
There was a recent boris johnson internview where he's talking about how the British sold the shah of iran billions of dollars worth of british tanks. This was when the british were plotting the coup against his government. They took the money, the coup occurred and the tanks never arrived in Iran. He's laughing as he's saying these things.
Bro, please forget about this fixation about tranche numbers.The potential other 20 planes would be T5, I guess.
I suspect there's also a potential for domestic ammunition integration, and it could involve other permits or technology access we don't know about.The size of the contract may indirectly indicate a very large-scale infrastructure investment. I believe that line and base maintenance levels are already indispensable requirements for the air force. However, if there are plans to supply additional fighters in future packages, I do not rule out the possibility that heavy maintenance processes may also be carried out by the air force after a certain period. Another issue is system integration and, in particular, the localization of weapon systems.
I would very much like to hear news about the integration of domestically produced weapon systems. Especially for air-to-air and air-to-ground standoff missile groups.
Although the financial scale of the contract will inevitably spark prolonged debate under any circumstances, setting that aspect aside for now; it is undoubtedly a significant step toward making certain risks our country faces more manageable until KAAN achieves operational capability, by partially addressing our air force's urgent need for intercept aircraft using one of the currently available options. I wish it well for our homeland and our nation.
They have to sell us something, if they don't it forces Turkiye to look to Russia, China etc. From my perspective the NATO side of the story always does the bare minimum for us. Basically just enough to keep us on side but never enough to truly help us with our regional problems.
This is how they are able to play a double game. Support our enemies, support terrorism against us, promote the agenda in their media and internationalise a domestic issue to the detriment of Turkiye.
So basically they do just enough to make sure they get the best outcome concerning Turkiye. As far as were concerned "beggars cannot be choosers". Going towards Russia, China is no good for us, USA, Europe is the lessor devil but its not great either.
So here we are, dumped out the F35 predictably so. Delayed by many years concerning fighter jet procurement and now were buying from the English and you hope if tomorrow you need to act in syria, the east med, cyprus or anywhere really that they don't pull an american on you. And the British are globally known for their games.
There was a recent boris johnson internview where he's talking about how the British sold the shah of iran billions of dollars worth of british tanks. This was when the british were plotting the coup against his government. They took the money, the coup occurred and the tanks never arrived in Iran. He's laughing as he's saying these things.
You can never rely on any country in general. The friendship between countries depend on mutual advantages. Our close relations with Great Britain before the WW1 (remember war of Crimea) helped us to order those 2 ships in 1911 and in 1914. GB empire wanted an Ottoman Empire that was on their side. When war broke out and they needed those ships themselves they kept them.The Ottoman battleships built and paid for in England (Sultan Osman, Reşadiye, etc.) were seized by England as a precautionary measure and wartime pretext before/at the beginning of World War I. England retained some of the ships and used them in its own navy, but this remains a footnote, as you said they are unreliable.
Abi ağzından bal damlıyorUnless of course our partnership goes beyond buyers and sellers, and Hurjet and Kaan and Tempest family become part of the same partnership in one way or another.
This!!!We need to learn to stand on our two feet
While Torries were in charge Ottomans had good relationship with Britain, Deisraeli was friend with Turks and by the way enemy of the Jews. When the Whigs (You can never rely on any country in general. The friendship between countries depend on mutual advantages. Our close relations with Great Britain before the WW1 (remember war of Crimea) helped us to order those 2 ships in 1911 and in 1914. GB empire wanted an Ottoman Empire that was on their side. When war broke out and they needed those ships themselves they kept them.
On top of it we entered the war on the German side a couple of months later. So they never paid back the money they received.
Think of it : total conjecture but….
We are building 2 Milgem ships for Ukraine. We enter the war against Russia and Ukraine joins Russia to fight against us because they have good concessions from the Russians. Do we still give those ships to Ukraine?
With countries, today’s friends can turn in to tomorrow’s enemies very easily. Look at Russia and Germany in WW2. Best buddies carved up Poland between them. Then they turned on each other.
We need to learn to stand on our two feet. We are in the Western block. But we only have allies that are going to help us if it helps them too.
You said very well, thats the point actually.You can never rely on any country in general. The friendship between countries depend on mutual advantages. Our close relations with Great Britain before the WW1 (remember war of Crimea) helped us to order those 2 ships in 1911 and in 1914. GB empire wanted an Ottoman Empire that was on their side. When war broke out and they needed those ships themselves they kept them.
On top of it we entered the war on the German side a couple of months later. So they never paid back the money they received.
Think of it : total conjecture but….
We are building 2 Milgem ships for Ukraine. We enter the war against Russia and Ukraine joins Russia to fight against us because they have good concessions from the Russians. Do we still give those ships to Ukraine?
With countries, today’s friends can turn in to tomorrow’s enemies very easily. Look at Russia and Germany in WW2. Best buddies carved up Poland between them. Then they turned on each other.
We need to learn to stand on our two feet. We are in the Western block. But we only have allies that are going to help us if it helps them too.
EF typhoon is truely feels like what a stop gap solution feels like, I am relived but not totally satisfied at the same time,