TR HÜRJET-Advanced Jet Trainer/ Light attack aircraft

dBSPL

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Ambassador
Messages
2,762
Reactions
110 14,087
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
4,045
Reactions
247 21,090
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Have you a source?




 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,100
Reactions
17 1,492
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
EJ200 weighs about the same as F404 but produces about 15% more thrust than the F404 used in Hurjet. Of course it is not Turkish so no automatic sovereignty over the engine but if political risk is high with a US engine it should be lower with a European engine. EJ200 cost is much higher than F404.

Turkiye does things quickly. How long might it take to design, build, test and certify an EJ200- powered Hurjet? Could Spain be interested in an EJ200 version or would delivery be delayed too much?
 
Last edited:

Kaan Azman 

Contributor
DH Visual Specialist
Messages
563
Reactions
30 2,303
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
About carrier based Hürjet, I am starting to have doubts regarding how much of a Hürjet will that be, just aside from obivious design changes

A LCA might be a complementary aircraft for a larger naval aviation fleet but ours is not that large. We have one bet and I don't think Hürjet with LCA-level capabilities is a big enough card. The carrier-based Hürjet will likely end up being way larger (And this is not only wing area) as it is supposed to be the main combat aircraft for MUGEM.

So, even one EJ200 might not cut it for what is in works.

I will try to get an answer on that matter when I go to SAHA EXPO next week.
 

Burberryswine11

New member
Messages
1
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Turkey
About carrier based Hürjet, I am starting to have doubts regarding how much of a Hürjet will that be, just aside from obivious design changes

A LCA might be a complementary aircraft for a larger naval aviation fleet but ours is not that large. We have one bet and I don't think Hürjet with LCA-level capabilities is a big enough card. The carrier-based Hürjet will likely end up being way larger (And this is not only wing area) as it is supposed to be the main combat aircraft for MUGEM.

So, even one EJ200 might not cut it for what is in works.

I will try to get an answer on that matter when I go to SAHA EXPO next week.
I am pretty sure KAAN will be navalized too, but for the first phases yeah Hurjet will be the main aircraft to be used with MUGEM (in a recent video released by TRT Haber they did announce KAAN will be used on MUGEM and the new pictures that were released of MUGEM shows the KAAN on it) other than that I think the naval version will probably be designated as Hurjet B and I also think when they said we almost have a ready ramp and are almost ready for ramp take off tests I think they meant they will start those tests with Hurjet soon? maybe this is all a speculation tho
 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,100
Reactions
17 1,492
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
I am pretty sure KAAN will be navalized too, but for the first phases yeah Hurjet will be the main aircraft to be used with MUGEM (in a recent video released by TRT Haber they did announce KAAN will be used on MUGEM and the new pictures that were released of MUGEM shows the KAAN on it) other than that I think the naval version will probably be designated as Hurjet B and I also think when they said we almost have a ready ramp and are almost ready for ramp take off tests I think they meant they will start those tests with Hurjet soon? maybe this is all a speculation tho
Are small fighters practical on carriers without catapults? India abandoned the idea of using their navalised version of Tejas because the load it could carry was too limited for the aircraft to be useful.
 

Pokemonte13

Contributor
Messages
681
Reactions
11 1,254
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Are small fighters practical on carriers without catapults? India abandoned the idea of using their navalised version of Tejas because the load it could carry was too limited for the aircraft to be useful.
Not really same issue with Kizilelma and Anka. Without a catapult their effectiveness is greatly reduced but I heard from a analyst that the navy might implement a catapult but it’s still not clear if it will happen. I’m guessing having a weak airwing is better than having no airwing.😅😅
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,573
Reactions
61 21,553
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
Considering how UAV, drones and loitering ammo has left a solid mark on the battlefields, I imagine that all LCA are going to be variants that can combat these threats.


meaning having A2A missiles, but also have pods with mini missiles for combatting drones and such.

Typhoon tests rocket system that could cut cost of downing a drone from $1m to just $20k​


Mike Morton 13th April 2026 at 12:06pm

The Typhoon used in the APKWS trial was fitted with two underwing rocket pods
The Typhoon used in the APKWS trial was fitted with two underwing rocket pods (Picture: BAE Systems)

Typhoons and F-35s have successfully shot down a number of one-way attack drones launched by Iran and its allies over the past few weeks, but this has come at a huge financial cost.
However, BAE Systems has successfully completed the test-firing of a low-cost precision weapon launched from a Typhoon, demonstrating a far more affordable solution to counter UAVs like the Shahed-136.
RAF Typhoon FGR4s are currently armed with a variety of missiles that were largely designed for air-to-air combat against enemy warplanes, and while they may be highly effective, they are also highly expensive.

Hydra meets laser

The AIM-120 AMRAAM (Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile), for example, costs around $1m, while AIM-9X Sidewinders are roughly $450,000.
Typhoons also carry short-range missiles such as the IRIS-T (infrared imaging system tail/thrust vector-controlled) and the ASRAAM (Advanced Short Range Air-to-Air Missile), and these are also costly.
When a 617 Squadron F-35B shot down a drone with one such missile, Air Vice Marshal (Ret'd) Sean Bell, a former fighter pilot, likened it to someone using a "sledgehammer to crack a nut".
To offer a more cost-effective solution, BAE Systems and the RAF have been experimenting with the Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS) laser-guidance kit, a system which is already in use on a number of US aircraft such as the F-16 Fighting Falcon.
This kit adds an additional section to unguided 70mm rockets like the Hydra, transforming them into precision-guided munitions.
The system, which first went into production back in 2008, creates a weapon with better accuracy that can be deployed against air or ground targets.
As well as fixed-wing aircraft, the system can be fitted to helicopters like the AH-64 Apache, uncrewed aerial vehicles, static and mounted ground platforms, and maritime vessels.
freestar

The 70mm rocket pods fitted to the Typhoon in conjunction with the APKWS guidance kit offer an effective alternative to air-to-air missiles
The 70mm rocket pods fitted to the Typhoon in conjunction with the APKWS guidance kit offer an effective alternative to air-to-air missiles (Picture: BAE Systems)

How it works

The APKWS kit includes advanced distributed aperture semi-active laser seeker optics located on all four guidance wings on the rocket.
These are protected by wing-slot seals prior to firing, avoiding the adjacent fire damage that can interfere with a nose-mounted seeker.
Once the rocket is fired, the APKWS kit's wings deploy and the optics lock on to designated targets, guiding the rocket to the target.
A US soldier loads a 70mm APKWS training round into a pod fitted to an AH-64 Apache - the system has been in use with the US military for more than a decade
A US soldier loads a 70mm APKWS training round into a pod fitted to an AH-64 Apache – the system has been in use with the US military for more than a decade (Picture: US Department of War)

System proven

The trial involving the Typhoon saw the aircraft fitted out with the kit at the flight test development centre in Warton in Lancashire.
The Typhoon was then able to launch a successful strike on a ground-based target at a military testing range at an undisclosed location.
BAE Systems official Richard Hamilton explained: "As the UK's sovereign provider of combat air capability, we play a crucial role in supporting the UK Armed Forces, working closely with the Ministry of Defence to develop technologies that strengthen our national defence capabilities.
"This trial with the APKWS laser-guidance kit on Typhoon demonstrates a game-changing capability and a cost-effective solution that would enhance Typhoon's already impressive range of weapons capabilities."

__________________________________________
So I think that Hürjet is going to find it's market. Only question is how slow our government is going to be in producing Hürjet for own Airforce and make a LCA version of it. Which would require a new license.
 
Top Bottom