Latest Thread
Quite a contrast from today's India, no?While i was doing some personal research on anti-tank grenades, i came across this @Jackdaws @Joe Shearer et al:
Jhirad, Bisht, Tarapore, Khan: Four Indian Heroes of the 1965 War
The fact that a Jew, a Parsi and a Muslim were killed alongside their Hindu comrades does not amount to much in the Indian Army, which self-consciously avoids invidious distinctions. But their sacrifice was a bright, shining moment for what was then a teen-aged republic.thewire.in
I also suggest you watch Dash99er channel for similar content
Happens to be one of my favorite channels.
Happens to be one of my favorite channels.
He mostly focuses on ‘other’ conflicts around the world and doing a great job at as much accurate as he can get.
Edit: I thought he was flying DCS, not WT?!
It was logical from a West Pakistani perspective. While the population of East Pak was greater than West Pak ; the Muslim population of West Pak was greater than that of East Pak. Also, the West Pakistanis thought that the East Paks had too much Hindu influence with their sarees and Sanskritized Bengali script.I just notice, the majority of the refugees are Hindus in the footage. Corresponding to the historical reality.
I never fully understood why specially go after the Hindus when they weren’t leading the rebellion, nor they were holding lots of critical posts in east Pakistani government.
I don’t think it made any strategic sense for PAK army, but they did it anyway.
Btw, Indira Gandhi was intellIgent and very well spoken. If she was India's leader today, subcontinent probably would’ve been better off.
To me as well. Bhakts should watch it.
I just notice, the majority of the refugees are Hindus in the footage. Corresponding to the historical reality.
I never fully understood why specially go after the Hindus when they weren’t leading the rebellion, nor they were holding lots of critical posts in east Pakistani government.
I don’t think it made any strategic sense for PAK army, but they did it anyway.
Btw, Indira Gandhi was intellIgent and very well spoken. If she was India's leader today, subcontinent probably would’ve been better off.
91000 troops; not all were combatants though.That is debatable tbh, actual troops number being 91,000.
Niazi not only confident of "holding on" to East Pakistan but also "taking" territory from India. Of course, he along with 91,000 troops surrendered unconditionally.
Must not have been completely incompetent given that he won some accolades fighting the Imperial Japanese at the Burma front.before reading your comment i hit play, almost instantly from listening to this guy talk i knew i was listening to someone incompetent. Then i read your comment and i wasn't surprised at all. Intelligent and competent people are generally always measured in how they talk, rarely boastful or arrogant.