Latest Thread
What is nuclear warhead carrying capacity mean? Even Atmaca could carry an tactical warhead
There is not a warhead but the missile range is expected already. And some people claim that it has already flown a couple days ago.Ther is no nuclear warhead, it is a fake news.
Atmaca will use a turbojet engine, while Gezgin will use a turbofan engine. Therefore, the thrust/power efficiency values they produce will be very different.So,what will be the difference between Gezgin and Atmaca then?
I was waiting for the 1000+km Gezgin,why this instead?
ARAT engine, which will power first blocks of Gezgin, is a turbojet engine too.Atmaca will use a turbojet engine, while Gezgin will use a turbofan engine. Therefore, the thrust/power efficiency values they produce will be very different.
There is no class system for this. In the modern sense, it would mean at least an MRBM with a MIRV capable warhead design.Does missiles need a special configuration to carry a nuclear warhead?
Maybe we got some from somewhere you knowThere is no class system for this. In the modern sense, it would mean at least an MRBM with a MIRV capable warhead design.
But, as Turkey does not have a nuclear program, it's basically a waste of everyone's time to argue about all this for now.
We didn't.Maybe we got some from somewhere you know![]()
They put protection (that black thing) on dummies?Those are probably dummies.
They put protection (that black thing) on dummies?
Let's take a closer look at their airplanes
Probably yes. Look at fins of these and the fins of actual missiles that were in test firing.
View attachment 75430
And strange enough, the one with supposedly IIR seeker head doesn’t have protection in your photo.