TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,543
Reactions
34 4,414
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Why would they need new radar seeker for new a2a missile? Gökhan and gökdoğan doesn't matter, same seeker will work. Maybe they are developing AESA ?
 

Kaan Azman 

Well-known member
DH Visual Specialist
Messages
379
Reactions
22 1,539
Age
21
Website
twitter.com
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Gökhan (The only project we know thus the most likely)
Some missile based on HİSAR RF (Totally a good freaking idea when you consider dual pulse and overall longer range compared to surface launched Gökdoğan)

But again, what the hell is SAPAN 2 about if its quadpacked HİSAR D RF, I swear to god I will stand at the ROKETSAN stand in SAHA EXPO if I have to
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,217
Solutions
1
Reactions
12 3,311
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
We really need to come up with proper naming system for our missiles, hell, most of our products. This giving them all an individual name stuff isn't really working up, its just muddying the waters.

I mean, if I told you MKE is producing Ilgaz, can you guess what that is?
a 25 mm cannon.
No idea why they felt the need to name it as it is just a licensed product.
 

Shtr

Active member
Messages
56
Reactions
89
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I am pretty much sad about Gokhan. After a long break we have heard some news from Sage about Kizilgoz but still waiting something about Gokhan.

I bet there are some people close to SAGE and or some other institutions. Can someone give some information about it? The first RAMJET prototype was targeted to 2022 and we are almost 2025 and still no news.
 

BaburKhan

Well-known member
Messages
430
Reactions
5 997
Website
strategicreviewturkey.blogspot.com
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Germany
Meanwhile Defence Turk published an Article about AGRAS-200AA Seeker for the long-range AAM they work on. It is described that they Work on Missiles with Ranges that our Aircraft need not to enter the enemy Air Defence Zone to engage the Targets. For me it sounds not like a AA Missile with 200 km like Gökhan in Class of the Meteor.


Targets in enemy Air Space mean high Value Air Assests like Tankers, AWACS, MPA a.o Support Aircraft. The Interests in north Africa and the Conflicts in the eastern Mediterranean make sophisticated AA/AD Capabillities neccasarry.


 
Last edited:

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,543
Reactions
34 4,414
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I guess Hisar-D will have AESA seeker.
First the Japanese started equipp missiles with AESA seekers.


XRIM-4 – Naval surface-launched variant, project was previously canceled but effectively resurrected in 2016.[9]



Screenshot_2024-09-29-16-53-27-697-edit_com.google.android.googlequicksearchbox.jpg

Screenshot_2024-09-29-16-52-55-807-edit_com.google.android.googlequicksearchbox.jpg

Screenshot_2024-09-29-16-52-21-068-edit_com.google.android.googlequicksearchbox.jpg


Screenshot_2024-09-29-17-01-21-526_com.google.android.googlequicksearchbox.jpg

nFzKxO7.jpg

İmages were translated by Google lens
 
Last edited:

Radonsider

Contributor
Messages
1,429
Reactions
13 2,695
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Bit offtopic to the current discussion, but it seems to me that we can actually quadpack Siper Ü-1 if we design a narrower-taller booster. Siper Ü-1 is 238mm without booster (slimmer than the ESSM with 254mm) and 370mm with that chunky-short booster.


I want to see that quadpackable 100+km missile ASAP
 

Kaan Azman 

Well-known member
DH Visual Specialist
Messages
379
Reactions
22 1,539
Age
21
Website
twitter.com
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
as long as you keep the packed diameter within the canister boundaries it is alright dimmensionally.

But shift in the centre of gravity and stabiliy with a radically different booster is the next stage of this enginieering problem
 

Radonsider

Contributor
Messages
1,429
Reactions
13 2,695
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
as long as you keep the packed diameter within the canister boundaries it is alright dimmensionally.

But shift in the centre of gravity and stabiliy with a radically different booster is the next stage of this enginieering problem
Yep, I guess it is up to TN actually wanting that capability. I don't think Roketsan would bother with it without TN wanting it? Hopefully I am just wrong...
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom