Latest Thread
Please read the above replies and the last page, no need to post the same thing multiple times, discussions can move forward as quotesMeanwhile Defence Turk published an Article
Exhaust gases are extracted via the trench between the VLS cells, so your constraint is length of the cell.It's not enough to fit the missile, you need to have room for exhaust fumes and their exit.
Yep, I guess it is up to TN actually wanting that capability. I don't think Roketsan would bother with it without TN wanting it? Hopefully I am just wrong...as long as you keep the packed diameter within the canister boundaries it is alright dimmensionally.
But shift in the centre of gravity and stabiliy with a radically different booster is the next stage of this enginieering problem
No worries,Bit offtopic to the current discussion, but it seems to me that we can actually quadpack Siper Ü-1 if we design a narrower-taller booster. Siper Ü-1 is 238mm without booster (slimmer than the ESSM with 254mm) and 370mm with that chunky-short booster.
I want to see that quadpackable 100+km missile ASAP
No worries,
you will get quad packed-100km range-missiles without booster.
Look at the catalogue. Siper 1 Range with booster is 150km.
View attachment 70869
@Yasar_TR Dear the info in the catalogue is accurate?Does Siper1 have max range 150km?
Been telling this since the first day. Hisar-D B2 will be as capable as Siper-B1 in terms of guidance, all they need is a narrow booster capable of TVC if the flight stability matters.Bit offtopic to the current discussion, but it seems to me that we can actually quadpack Siper Ü-1 if we design a narrower-taller booster. Siper Ü-1 is 238mm without booster (slimmer than the ESSM with 254mm) and 370mm with that chunky-short booster.
I want to see that quadpackable 100+km missile ASAP