It was mentioned that Göksur will have three variants;
One with autonomy standalone version, search and track radars built-in
Another dependent on the platform but a higher capacity (which is the revealed one)
And lastly one for the USVs, fixed angled launcher (similar to Kuzgun-KY's test box launcher).
I am sorry but Aselsan is far ahead of Roketsan in terms of the launcher system alone. Roketsan simply should collaborate with Aselsan and adopting the launcher platform and continuing to work with Meteksan for the installed radar systems (for the standalone version). No need to burn cash beyond this point.
WTF! I can't imagine how huge it is in real
Look this is the twin Box RAM Prototyp
View attachment 71666
View attachment 71667
Now our launcher has double numbers of missiles. I wish some Göksur missiles to have cumulative anti armor warhead against USVs.
BTW why Barbaros modernization does not consist this launcher?
Old Sea sparrow launchers also could be used with Göksur.
View attachment 71668
Possibly both sides can be configured individually, that is why Aselsan has split the loading into two with the following motives;
- If the system gets hit, the launcher continues to operate with a single side (damage is contained)
- Launcher can be configured differently, simply swap Göksur IIR box with Sungur-D ,if Roketsan cooperates Levent and even possibly Göksur RF box, or lastly the long waited CLOS missile.
Also note the frame of the launched can be configured with the 35mm (as in repurposing standalone Göksur).