Siper Blok 1 not finished they will have 150 km range and big possibilty they can have terminal stage iir guidance and terminal stage dacs fins in the other hand 10 sam better than 8 sam .
Aster 30 missiles are very agile with Pif-Paf systems and vector controls. They have successfully demonstrated multiple times they are accurate even against supersonic targets. They have RF seeker heads.
Siper is still in development stage. We know that in the latest firing, they managed to equal Aster 30 altitude and range (Even though exact figures were not uttered, Mr Demir said enough to conclude that we have a missile that is on par with Aster 30). For a missile like Siper with such high speeds, to overcome heating problems of the IIR seeker heads will be detrimental to it’s overall range. 150km range version may not be ready for I class ships, even if they find a way to fit them in the MILDAS.
As mentioned here by
@Anmdt , as the TN is very much in favour of quad packing, we may find some form of compromise may be reached in the days to come. As per
@UkroTurk ’s comments, the Siper we have seen the pictures of, is a fairly streamlined missile, that should fit in to the MILDAS.
I agree that in any form or shape if we have an AD missile like Siper that has comparable specifications to Aster30; outright, I would say, ours is superior, since it is a closed box with no known particulars.
