Kargı, in response to brave janissary
- Messages
- 5,380
- Solutions
- 2
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
TF-100 was never I-Class. But let's pretend it is.
You don't simply build first of the optional hulls (either for TF-2000 or I-Class) in the military shipyard. TF-100 was a whole new design in the past, likely split in two and merged to I-Class and TF-2000 projects. Navy has got a way to get 8 more hulls (+4 TF-2000 and +4 I-Class) In place of the TF-100.
Previous formation has been;
4 I-Class (+4 Optional), 4 TF-2000 (+3 Optional) + 4 TF-100, which transformed to;
8 I+Class (+Options), 8 TF-2000 (+Options).
Also notice NG MCMW and NG MHV are separate projects. Dearsan has secured the deal for one of these, for prototype construction and one another will be conceptualized by another company in cooperation with the Navy DPO.
This was the SSB's plan earlier, each first hull of the new designs are to be built in military shipyards, and follow up orders are to be built by private shipyards. All in all TF-100 was a planned new design and let go in the last year.
The table is mostly valid as of 2024.
You don't simply build first of the optional hulls (either for TF-2000 or I-Class) in the military shipyard. TF-100 was a whole new design in the past, likely split in two and merged to I-Class and TF-2000 projects. Navy has got a way to get 8 more hulls (+4 TF-2000 and +4 I-Class) In place of the TF-100.
Previous formation has been;
4 I-Class (+4 Optional), 4 TF-2000 (+3 Optional) + 4 TF-100, which transformed to;
8 I+Class (+Options), 8 TF-2000 (+Options).
Also notice NG MCMW and NG MHV are separate projects. Dearsan has secured the deal for one of these, for prototype construction and one another will be conceptualized by another company in cooperation with the Navy DPO.
This was the SSB's plan earlier, each first hull of the new designs are to be built in military shipyards, and follow up orders are to be built by private shipyards. All in all TF-100 was a planned new design and let go in the last year.
The table is mostly valid as of 2024.
Last edited:
Radonsider
Contributor
- Messages
- 1,437
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
Navy with massive planning W again
- Messages
- 8,513
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
Well considering how we're sending off our AW frigate to Somalia. It's hard to believe that our government has coordinated this move with TN. As such it's paramount that TCG capabilities are raised to be able to safeguard our interest in Mavi Vatan.
I don't see how our Navy has leeway to send off our combat ships like this
I don't see how our Navy has leeway to send off our combat ships like this
Last edited:
Fairon
Well-known member
- Messages
- 390
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
I think Navy would want that deployement though even the goverment didn't coordinated with them first. Our Navy wants to extends their reach and this will be a perfect experience for them and because of that I think Navy was in the decision making for this move.
Last edited:
somegoodusername
Active member
- Messages
- 116
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
You don't extend your reach when your mainland is in danger. They sent seismic research ship 5000 km away from the East Med to please Greeks and Americans.
The news that Turkey will explore oil and gas in Somalian waters has upset certain countries a lot and it is their extensions within Turkey that object, ostensibly due to security concerns which is of course nonsense. Security of the homeland did not rely on those two frigates and natural resources off Somalia are a great financial opportunity for Turkey.
