• Forum restore complete (see latest announcement thread)

TR Navy Naval Programs

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,804
Solutions
2
Reactions
148 26,908
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
According to U.S Naval İnstitute ‘’ A proficient crew can launch its first four weapons in about two minutes. To reload each tube takes 10 to 20 minutes—up to an hour for all four—depending on the arrangement of the room’’
These numbers may not be up to date, and moreover given for a spacious submarine. Modern spacious submarines have a torpedo transfer system which stores torpedoes in a room, access it, carry it to the torpedo and act as an automated arm/winch to ease the process for the crew.

For small and generic sized submarines with berths located at the fore section, i can't even imagine how long it would take for a single tube.
 

Kaan Azman 

Contributor
DH Visual Specialist
Messages
610
Reactions
30 2,434
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I hope it will be something bigger than DERİNGÖZ. STM previously announced intentions for an UUV based on the SDV so...
 

OPTIMUS

Committed member
Messages
261
Reactions
2 594
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
In my opinion, AIP technology with fuel cells is the wrong way for submarines, although it has been used in several countries. The future is lithium-ion operation.

1) Very long underwater operation,
2) very direct response to the command,
3) very high underwater speed,
4) very short charging time,
5) low maintenance,
6) Known and more controllable technology,
7) Ease of construction and
8) Placement in submarine bodies.


Fuel cell operation is exactly the opposite of these.

The Japanese have realized this and equipped their last three SORYU class submarines and new Taygay class submarines with Li-Ion technology.



Screenshot 2024-10-20 180742.png
 

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
2,271
Solutions
1
Reactions
42 6,661
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Dual Engine Kizilelma but only single engine Naval Hürjet models. How feasible is a single engine Hürjet?

Hürjet as a naval fighter in late 2030s-early 2040s is not feasible in any configuration whatsoever. It is a stupid idea. We'd be better of without an aircraft carrier if we're going half arse the most important part of one. Just built Trakya with focus on drones. Hell, we could probably built 2 more like it and it would still cost less than an aircraft carrier that is going to use Hürjet...
 

Kartal1

Experienced member
Moderator
Messages
5,291
Reactions
114 19,734
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Turkey
Lets not throw claims based on nothing.

If we are going to have a discussion like this we can talk about assumptions, but can not talk about it as facts. We should be a bit more aware and contribute to the discussion with something credible if we are to support a claim.
 
Top Bottom