Sadly, I think this was always going to be the result of the Republic
the key part of republic is constitution which currently ignored by those who are in power constitution especially the first 4 item clearly forbite what currently Erdogan is suggesting not only that constitution reject the even these thing be suggested ! and we cant even call this a democracy since people vote against PKK in last election now Erdogan doing 180 degree turn so what is this reminded you ?? yeah the time when one man could do anything they like, like the time of abdul hamid ii who give also of powers to none turks under the name of pan Islamism were those people use it for their own nationalist agenda to divide the empire more as well as loosing so much land and being absolutely incompetent until he was overthrown by young turks and put stop to his pan islamism madness
republic system was working and people had right to choose what they wanted until islamist came and destroyed it now you blame the failure of this new regime which is a neither a republic and as of 2023 election nor is a democracy on republic system ?? you truly are a man with ill intention
You say it worked, but every single decade, there was a need for a Coup
what the fuck are you talking about you ignored cahil. turkey had only 2 coup one was in 27 maıys 1960 other one was 12 eylül 1980
the 1960 coup did happened because of imbalanced in constitution that give so much power to government while parliament power was much less hence after the coup new constitution prepared to empower the parliament and with in 1 year turkey return to democracy. 1980 coup happened because turkey due to the stupidity of political class who polarized the society as well as cold war interference of soviet and CIA drive the country to edge of civil war. moreover the politician refuse to work together to form a coalition government army give memorandum if they don't work together then army will stage a coup politician knowingly refuse because it was political suicide for them after they polarized the society to that level. after the coup again just like 1960s coup university professors called as task to find the weakness of political system and fix it. within one year new constitution put in on referendum and turkey return to democracy
where is a coup every decade you Liar ??
. As soon as the CHP stopped being a single-party dictatorship
again you Liar. CHP during single party wasn't a dictatorship the reason it was a single party was because there wasn't enough educated turks around to from a functioning multiparty democracy. also since literacy rate was only 5% general election postponed until illiteracy rate could cover majority of people anyone who was educated enough was invited to do politics and help govern the country including adnan menderes who was discovered by ataturk and send to be future educated. within the single party there was different faction who freely compete with one another and had elections . they were basically seeds to form new parties in future and turn turkey into munity party democracy
Let's face it, the system was never going to work, and it is one of the reasons why I'm a monarchist and why I think Atatürk should have either made himself or Ömer Faruk Osmanoğlu the sultan instead of creating the republic after the war. There needs to be a person that embodies the state that can fight against institutional erosion and governemnt curruption.
system were working fine until islamist with the help of Americans show up and demolished it and now you blame the failure of this one man islamic system on republic ?? are you high ? btw the system you are defending is the current system of turkey where 1 single person do whatever he likes ad there is no check and balances
all i hear from you is misinformation and propaganda likes of which i only heard from CIA blacked islamist groups such as Fetö and im pretty sure this is not due to your ignorance but rather ill intention. also im still waiting for your answer about the young Turks
